Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-4fqgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-03T15:35:20.282Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms Affecting Emission in Rare-Earth-Activated Phosphors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

David R. Tallant
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185-1411, U.S.A.
Carleton H. Seager
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185-1411, U.S.A.
Regina L. Simpson
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185-1411, U.S.A.
Get access


The relatively poor efficiency of phosphor materials in cathodoluminescence with low accelerating voltages is a major concern in the design of field emission flat panel displays operated below 5 kV. Our research on rare-earth-activated phosphors indicates that mechanisms involving interactions of excited activators have a significant impact on phosphor efficiency. Persistence measurements in photoluminescence (PL) and cathodoluminescence (CL) show significant deviations from the sequential relaxation model. This model assumes that higher excited manifolds in an activator de-excite primarily by phonon-mediated sequential relaxation to lower energy manifolds in the same activator ion. In addition to sequential relaxation, there appears to be strong coupling between activators, which results in energy transfer interactions. Some of these interactions negatively impact phosphor efficiency by nonradiatively de-exciting activators. Increasing activator concentration enhances these interactions. The net effect is a significant degradation in phosphor efficiency at useful activator concentrations, which is exaggerated when low–energy electron beams are used to excite the emission.

Research Article
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



1. Ozawa, L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126(1), 106109 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Vater, U., Kunzler, G. and Tews, W., Journal of Fluorescence 4, 7982 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Seager, C. H. and Tallant, D. R., “The Role of Activator-Activator Interactions in Reducing Low-Voltage-Cathodoluminescence Efficiency in Eu and Tb doped Phosphors,” to be published in J. Appl. Physics.Google Scholar
4. Heber, J. and Kobler, U., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. F., 37(4), 772777 (1973)Google Scholar
5. Heber, J., Hellwege, K. H., Kobler, U. and Murmann, H., Z. Physik 237, 189204 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hunt, R. B. Jr. and Pappalardo, R. G., Journal of Luminescence, 34, 133146 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Tallant, D. R., Miller, M. P. and Wright, J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 65(2), 510521 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fuller, M. J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 128(6), 1381–3 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar