Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:44:24.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence and Characterization of Crystallographic Defect and Material Quality after SLIM-Cut Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

Alex Masolin
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium imec, Leuven, Belgium
Jan Vaes
Affiliation:
imec, Leuven, Belgium
Frederic Dross
Affiliation:
imec, Leuven, Belgium
Roberto Martini
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Amaia Pesquera Rodriguez
Affiliation:
University of Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
Jef Poortmans
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium imec, Leuven, Belgium
Robert Mertens
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium imec, Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The SLIM-Cut process is a kerf-free wafering technique to obtain silicon substrates as thin as 50μm. The quality of the resulting material must be assessed to ensure that this innovative Si-foil approach does not jeopardize the potential efficiency of the final solar cell in terms of electronic activity, defect density and location. For that reason, we performed Microwave-Detected Photoconductance Decay (MW-PCD), Deep-Level Transient Spectroscopy (DLTS) and optical inspections after defect etching of the foils surface. Analyses indicate that SLIM-Cut generates crystallographic defects which create deep level traps that have a negative impact on the lifetime of the silicon foil. Nonetheless, a decrease of the thermal budget will lead to a reduction of plasticity and hence lower the amount of defects and increase the foil quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Dross, F., et al. ., Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, Vol. 89, 1, pp. 149152 Google Scholar
[2] Ando, T. et al. ., Micromechatronics and Human Science, 1997, pp. 5560 Google Scholar
[3] Samuels, J. et al. ., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 421, 1989, pp. 153 Google Scholar
[4] Folk, R.H. II, et al. ., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 539, 1999, pp. 161167 Google Scholar
[5] Basore, P.A. et al. ., 21st IEEE PVSC, 2125 May 1990, Kissimmee, FL Google Scholar
[6] Schmidt, J. et al. ., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6186 (1997)Google Scholar
[7] Lang, D.V., JAP Vol. 45, Issue 7, 1974, pp. 30233032 Google Scholar
[8] Rauh, H., “Wacker’s atlas for characterization of defects in silicon,” Wacker-Chemitronic GmbH (unpublished)Google Scholar
[9] Ebrahimi, F. et al. ., Materials Science and Engineering A268 (1999), pp. 116126 Google Scholar
[10] Seibt, M. et al. ., Physica Status Solidi (a), Vol. 202, Issue 5, pp. 911920 Google Scholar