Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-cs4hf Total loading time: 14.914 Render date: 2021-04-16T10:59:40.304Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Cleaning of SiO2: Differences Between Thermal and Deposited Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Ravkin
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
J. J. Farber
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
I. J. Malik
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
A. J. Jensen
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
J. M. de Larios
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
W. C. Krusell
Affiliation:
OnTrak Systems, Inc., Milpitas, CA 95035
Get access

Abstract

The effects described in this paper are specific to cleaning with mechanical brush scrubbing. Oxides, both thermally grown and deposited are common cleaning applications for mechanical brush scrubbing. Thermally grown oxides present higher final defect counts after scrubbing with deionized water compared to deposited oxides. In this paper we present our results on the cleaning of unpolished and polished oxide surfaces and show differences in these results to be dependent on the chemistry used for cleaning and the degree of hydrophilicity of the wafer surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Krusell, W.C., de Larios, J.M., The Resurgence of Mechanical Brush Scrubbing, Semicon Korea, Presentation.Google Scholar
2. Hetherington, D.L., Resnick, P.J., Timon, R.P., Draper, B.L., Ravkin, M., de Larios, J.M., Krusell, W.C., Madhani, A.F., (February, 1995 VUMIC).Google Scholar
3. Malik, I.J., Zhang, J., Jensen, A.J., Farber, J.J., Krusell, W.C., O2. 4, MRS, (1995 Spring).Google Scholar
4. Iler, R.K., The Chemistry of Silica, pp. 643700, (John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1979).Google Scholar
5. Roy, S.R., Ali, I., Shinn, G., Furusawa, N., Shahn, R., Peterman, S., Witt, K., Eastman, S., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.142, No. 1, (January 1995).Google Scholar
6. Mouche, L., Tardif, F. and Derrien, J., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.141, No. 6, 1684, (June 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Verhaverbeke, S., Messoussi, R. and Ohmi, T., UCPSS, P35, (1994).Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cleaning of SiO2: Differences Between Thermal and Deposited Oxides
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Cleaning of SiO2: Differences Between Thermal and Deposited Oxides
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Cleaning of SiO2: Differences Between Thermal and Deposited Oxides
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *