Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T00:37:29.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bandgap Variation and Miscibility Gaps of Thallium-Based Pseudo-Binary Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A.-B. Chen
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Auburn University, AL 36849, abchen@physics.aubum.edu
J. Piao
Affiliation:
Epitaxial Laboratory Inc., 25 E. Loop Rd., Stony Brook, NY 11790-3350
Get access

Abstract

To stimulate further research on the TI-based semiconductor alloys for long-wave infrared (LWIR) application, we carried out detailed calculations for the variation of band gaps versus lattice constants and the alloy miscibility gaps of cation-substituted pseudo-binary alloys. These results are used to identify promising TI-based LWIR alloys and the lattice-matched non-TI bearing alloys for possible substrates and passivation caps. Although all the six Tl-bearing pseudo-binary alloys studied can have a 0.1 eV band gap, none of these systems are lattice matched to a pure III-V compound. Five of these six alloys can have a non-TI-bearing lattice-matched ternary alloy as the substrate, but only two do not have a serious problem with the miscibility gap. When further considering the difficulty of incorporating TI with a large concentration, the only promising LWIR pseudo-binary alloy left is In1−xTlxAs with x≍0. 16.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schilfgaarde, M. van, Chen, A.-B., Krishnamurthy, S., and Sher, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2714 (1994)Google Scholar
2. Yamamoto, K., Asahi, H., Fushida, M., Iwata, K., and Gonda, S., J. Appl. Phys. 81 (4), 1704 (1997); H Asahi, private communication.Google Scholar
3. Antonell, M. J. and Abernathy, C. R., Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. 379, 511 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Shellenbarger, Z. A., Mauk, M. G.. Cox, J. A., Smith, J. A., Sims, P. E., McNeely, J. B., and DiNetta, L. C., private communication.Google Scholar
5. Chen, A.-B. and Sher, A., Semiconductor Alloys, Physics and Materials Engineering (Plenum Press, 1995).Google Scholar
6. Hass, K., Lampert, R. J., and Ehrenreich, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 77(1984); R. J. Lampert, K. C. Hass, and H. Ehrenreich, Phys. Rev. B 36, 1111 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Vegard, L., Z. Phys. 5, 17 (1921).Google Scholar
8. Stringfellow, G. B., J. Crys. Growth 27, 21 (1974)Google Scholar
9. Martins, J. L. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 30, 6217 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Chen, A.-B. and Sher, A., Phys. Rev. B 32, 3695 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Wei, S-H., Ferreira, L. G., and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 41, 6240 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Sher, A., Schilfgaarde, M. van, Chen, A.-B. and Chen, W., Phys. Rev. B 36, 4279 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Kukuchi, R., Phys. Rev. 81, 988 (1951).Google Scholar
14. Dickerson, B., Ph.D. Dissertation, Auburn University (1997).Google Scholar
15.Eq.(4.6.13) of Ref. 5.Google Scholar