Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T13:53:52.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Brittle Intergranular Crack Propagation During Stress Corrosion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Russell H. Jones*
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Crack growth rates during intergranular stress corrosion, in materials such as Fe in Ca(NO3)2 at +750 mV (SCE), appear to exceed rates which can occur by dissolution and ion transport within the crack. Brittle crack jumps induced by a corrosion or stress corrosion process, and which magnify the dissolution supported crack velocity by a factor of up to 103, could explain this behavior. Hydrogen can induce these very fast crack growth rates, but these rates have been obtained at electrochemical potentials where H reduction is not thermodynamically possible. Other possible mechanisms for this accelerated crack growth include: 1) intergranularcorrosion altered tearing modulus, 2) grain boundary dealloying, or 3) adsorption induced brittle fracture. Examination of each of these mechanisms suggests that intergranular corrosion could reduce the tearing modulus through changes in the crack shape. However, crack opening analysis clearly shows that the crack tip is shielded from the applied stress intensity and that an embrittlement process which reduces the interface toughness is need for brittle intergranular crack jumps to occur. Further research is in progress to identify the source of this embrittlement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jones, R.H., Windisch, C.F., Arey, B.W. and Baer, D.R., Corrosion, in press.Google Scholar
2. Simonen, E.P. and Jones, R.H., Corrosion Science, in press.Google Scholar
3. Danielson, M.J., Oster, C.A. and Jones, R.H., Corrosion Science, vol.32, p. 1 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Jones, R.H., Friesel, M.A. and Gerberich, W.W., Metall. Trans. A, Vol 20A, p. 637, (1989).Google Scholar
5. Pugh, E.N., in Proceedings of Atomistics of Fracture, Latanision, R.M. and Pickens, J.R., eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY 10013, p 997 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Newman, R.C. and Sieradzki, K. in Chemistry and Physics of Fracture, Latanision, R.M. and Jones, R.H., eds., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands, p. 597 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Sieradzki, K., 1991 NACE Corrosion Research Symposium, March 11–13, 1991, Cincinnati, OH, p.38.Google Scholar
8. Newman, R.C., Young, A.J., Suleiman, M.I. and Kelly, R.G., 1991 NACE Corrosion Research Symposium, March 11–13, 1991, Cincinnati, OH. p. 39.Google Scholar
9. Smith, E., “The Transition Between Stress Corrosion Crack Growth and Plastic Fracture”, Engr. Fracture Mechanics, Vol.18, p. 595 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Jones, R.H., Danielson, M.J. and Baer, D.R., J. Materials for Energy Systems, Vol.8, p. 185 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Zallen, R., “The Physics of Amorphous Solids”, 1983, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, p. 170.Google Scholar
12. Forty, A.J. and Rowlands, G., Phil. Nag. A, Vol.43, p. 171 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Stoloff, N.S., in proceedings of Environment-Induced Cracking of Metals, Gangloff, R.P. and Ives, M.B., eds., National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, p, 32, (1988).Google Scholar
14. Lynch, S.P., Acta Metall. 29, p. 325 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Wheeler, D.A., Hoagland, R.G. and Hirth, J.P., Scripta Metall. 22, p.533 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Windisch, C.F., Baer, D.R., Jones, R.H. and Engelhard, M.H., J. of the Electrochemical Soc., in press.Google Scholar
17. Jones, R.H., Acta metall. Vol.38, p.1703 (1990).Google Scholar