Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:12:34.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Spray Processing of FGMs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Functionally gradient materials (FGMs) display continuously or discontinuously varying compositions and/or microstructures over definable geometrical distances. The gradients can be continuous on a microscopic level, or they can be laminates comprised of gradients of metals, ceramics, polymers, or variations of porosity/density. Several processing techniques have been explored for the fabrication of FGMs for structural applications, e.g., powder metallurgy, thermal spraying, in situ synthesis, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis, reactive infiltration, etc. Physical and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques are also being explored to process FGM films with nanometer level gradients in composition. This article addresses the issues related to thermal-spray processing of FGMs and will only peripherally compare the advantages and limitations of thermal spray versus other processing techniques as reported in the literature.

In thermal spraying, feedstock material (in the form of powder, rod, or wire) is introduced into a combustion or plasma flame. The particles melt in transit and impinge on the substrate where they flatten, undergo rapid solidification, and form a deposit through successive impingement. Thermal spraying has been traditionally employed to produce a variety of protective coatings of ceramics, metals, and polymers on a range of substrates. More recently, the process has been used for spray-forming structural components.

Arc spray, combustion, and plasma are the major techniques comprising thermal spray. These classifications are based on the type of heat source and the method by which feedstock is injected. Arc-spray processes use electrically conductive wire as feedstock, while combustion methods use powder or wire.

Type
Functionally Gradient Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Thorpe, M.L., Adv. Mat. Proc. 143 (5) (1993) p. 50.Google Scholar
2.Sampath, S. and Herman, H., J. Metals 45 (7) (1993) p. 42.Google Scholar
3.Herman, H., Sci. Am. 256 (9) (1988) p. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chraska, P. and Hrabovsky, M., in Thermal Spray: International Advances in Coatings Technology, edited by Berndt, C.C., ASM Int. (Proc. Int. Thermal Spray Conf., Orlando, FL, 1992) p. 81.Google Scholar
5.Sickinger, A. and Muehlburger, E., Powder Met. Int. 24 (2) (1992) p. 91.Google Scholar
6.Safai, S. and Herman, H., in Treatise Materials Science and Technology, edited by Herman, H. (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981) p. 183.Google Scholar
7.Sampath, S., PhD thesis, State University of New York–Stony Brook, 1989.Google Scholar
8.Sampath, S. and Herman, H., in Thermal Spray Technology, New Ideas and Processes, edited by Houck, D.L., ASM Int. (Proc. Natl. Thermal Spray Conf., Cincinnati, OH, 1988) p. 1.Google Scholar
9.Miller, R.A., Surf. Coat. and Tech. 30 (1987) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Fukushima, T., Kuroda, S., and Kitahara, S., in Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on FGM, edited by Yamanouchi, M., Koizumi, M., Hirai, T., and Shiota, I. (Sendai, Japan, 1990) p. 147.Google Scholar
11.Beardsley, M.B., Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, IL (unpublished).Google Scholar
12.Marshall, D.B., Noma, T., and Evans, A.G., Comm. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65 (1982) p. C175.Google Scholar
13.Finot, M., Suresh, S., Bull, C., Sampath, S., and Giannakopoulos, A.E., Thermal Cycling of Compositionally Graded Ni-Al2O3 Multilayered Material, submitted to Mat. Sci. and Eng.Google Scholar
14.Giannakopoulos, A.E., Suresh, S., Finot, M., and Olsson, M., Acta Metall. (1994) in press.Google Scholar