Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:46:50.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenomenological Modeling of Fusion Welding Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

S.A. David ,
T. DebRoy  and
J.M. Vitek
Get access

Extract

Welding is utilized in 50% of the industrial, commercial, and consumer products that make up the U.S. gross national product. In the construction of buildings, bridges, ships, and submarines, and in the aerospace, automotive, and electronic industries, welding is an essential activity. In the last few decades, welding has evolved from an empirical art to a more scientifically based activity requiring synthesis of knowledge from various disciplines. Defects in welds, or poor performance of welds, can lead to catastrophic failures with costly consequences, including loss of property and life.

Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the welding process showing the interaction between the heat source and the base metal. During the interaction of the heat source with the material, several critical events occur: melting, vaporization, solidification, and solid-state transformations. The weldment is divided into three distinct regions: the fusion zone (FZ), which undergoes melting and solidification; the heat-affected zone (HAZ) adjacent to the FZ, that may experience solid-state phase changes but no melting; and the unaffected base metal (BM).

Creating the extensive experimental data base required to adequately characterize the highly complex fusion welding process is expensive and time consuming, if not impractical. One recourse is to simulate welding processes either mathematically or physically in order to develop a phenomenological understanding of the process. In mathematical modeling, a set of algebraic or differential equations are solved to obtain detailed insight of the process. In physical modeling, understanding of a component of the welding process is achieved through experiments designed to avoid complexities that are unrelated to the component investigated.

In recent years, process modeling has grown to be a powerful tool for understanding the welding process. Using computational modeling, significant progress has been made in evaluating how the physical processes in the weld pool influence the development of the weld pool and the macrostructures and microstructures of the weld.

Type
Mathematical Modeling of Materials Processing
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 29 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.American Welding Society Statement, USA Today (March 22, 1992).Google Scholar
2.David, S.A. and DebRoy, T., Science 257 (1992) p. 497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Advances in Welding Science and Technology, edited by David, S.A. (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1986).Google Scholar
4.Recent Trends in Welding Science and Technology, edited by David, S.A. and Vitek, J.M. (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1990).Google Scholar
5.International Trends in Welding Science and Technology, edited by David, S.A. and Vitek, J.M. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1993).Google Scholar
6.Mathematical Modeling of Weld Phenomena, edited by Cerjak, H. and Easterling, K.E. (The Institute of Materials, London, 1993).Google Scholar
7. Modeling for Welding Science, DOE-BES Workshop (Cocoa Beach, March 16-19, 1993).Google Scholar
8.Kou, S. and Le, Y., Metall. Trans. A 14A (1983) p. 2243.Google Scholar
9.Oreper, G.M. and Szekely, J., J. Fluid Mech. 147 (1984) p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Chan, C., Mazumder, J., and Chen, M.M., Metall. Trans. A 15A (1984) p. 2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Szekely, J. in Reference 3, p. 3.Google Scholar
12.Paul, A. and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. B 19B (1988) p. 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zacharia, T., David, S.A., Vitek, J.M., and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. A 20A (1989) p. 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Geankoplis, C.J., Transport Processes and Unit Operations (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1983).Google Scholar
15.Heiple, C.R. and Roper, J.R., Weld. J. Res. Supp. 61 (1982) p. 92s.Google Scholar
16.Heiple, C.R., Roper, J.R., Stagner, R.T., and Alden, J.J., in Reference 15, p. 72s.Google Scholar
17.Sahoo, P., DebRoy, T., and McNallan, M.J., in Reference 12, p. 483.Google Scholar
18.McNallan, M.J. and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. B 22B (1991) p. 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Mundra, K. and DebRoy, T., unpublished research, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
20.Heiple, R. and Roper, J.R., in Trends in Welding Research, edited by David, S.A., (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1982) p. 489.Google Scholar
21.Richardson, F.D., Physical Chemistry of Melts in Metallurgy, Vol. 2 (Academic Press, London, 1974) p. 349.Google Scholar
22.Zacharia, T., David, S.A., Vitek, J.M., and DebRoy, T., Weld. J. Res. Supp. 68 (1989) p. 499s.Google Scholar
23.Zacharia, T., David, S.A., Vitek, J.M., and DebRoy, T., in Reference 22, p. 510s.Google Scholar
24.Khan, P.A.A. and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. B 15B (1984) p. 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.DebRoy, T., Basu, S., and Mundra, K., J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) p. 1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Mundra, K. and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. B 24B (1993) p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Mundra, K. and DebRoy, T., Weld. J. Res. Supp. 72 (1993) p. 1s.Google Scholar
28.DebRoy, T., in Reference 5, p. 17.Google Scholar
29.Khan, P.A.A., DebRoy, T., and David, S.A., Weld. J. Res. Supp. 67 (1988) p. 1s.Google Scholar
30.Cieslak, M.J. and Fuerschbach, P.W., in Reference 12, p. 319.Google Scholar
31.Block-Bolten, A. and Eager, T.W., in Reference 24, p. 461.Google Scholar
32.Blake, A. and Mazumder, J., J. Eng. Industry 107 (1985) p. 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Basu, S., MS thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1992.Google Scholar
34.Pehlke, R.D., Unit Processes in Extractive Metallurgy (Elsevier, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
35.Kraus, H.G., in Reference 22, p. 269s.Google Scholar
36.Anisimov, S.I. and Rakhmatulina, A.K., Son. Phys. IETP 37 (1973) p. 41.Google Scholar
37.Knight, C.J., AIAA J. 17 (1979) p. 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.von Allmen, M., Laser-Beam Interactions with Materials (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Batanov, V.A., Bunkin, F.V., Prokhorov, A.M., and Fedorov, V.B., Sov. Phys. JETP 36 (1973) p. 311.Google Scholar
40.Chan, C.L. and Mazumder, J., J. Appl. Phys. 62 (1987) p. 4579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Schlunder, E.U. and Gniclinski, V., Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 39 (1967) p. 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Gedeon, S.A. and Eagar, T.W., Weld. J. Res. Supp. 69 (1990) p. 264s.Google Scholar
43.Ohno, S. and Uda, M., Trans. Nat. Res. Inst. Met. 23 (1981) p. 243.Google Scholar
44.den Ouden, G. and Griebling, O., in Reference 4, p. 431.Google Scholar
45.Uda, M., Ohno, S., and Wada, T., J. Jpn. Weld. Soc. 38 (1969) p. 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Uda, M. and Ohno, S., Trans. Nat. Res. Inst. Met. 15 (1973) p. 20.Google Scholar
47.Bandopadhyay, A., Banerjee, A., and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. B 23B (1992) p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Dunn, G.J. and Eagar, T.W., Metall. Trans. A 17A (1986) p. 1865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Collur, M.M. and DebRoy, T., Metall. Trans. B 20B (1989) p. 227.Google Scholar
50.David, S.A. and Vitek, J.M., Intl. Materials Rev. 34 (1989) p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51.Rappaz, M., David, S.A., Vitek, J.M., and Boatner, L.A., in Reference 13, p. 1125.Google Scholar
52.Rappaz, M., David, S.A., Vitek, J.M., and Boatner, L.A., Metall. Trans. A 21A (1990) p. 1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.David, S.A., Vitek, J.M., Rappaz, M., and Boatner, L.A., in Reference 52, p. 1753.Google Scholar
54.Rappaz, M., Vitek, J.M., David, S.A., and Boatner, L.A., Metall. Trans. A 24A (1993) p. 1443.Google Scholar
55.Brooks, J.A., Baskes, M.J., and Greulich, F.A., Metall. Trans. A 22A (1991) p. 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56.Elmer, J.W., Eagar, T.W., and Allen, S.M., in Proc. Int'l. Conf. Stainless Steels (Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Tokyo, 1991) p. 669.Google Scholar
57.Matsunawa, A., Katayama, S., and Shimidzu, M., Trans. Jpn. Weld. Res. Inst. 19 (1990) p. 67.Google Scholar
58.Flemings, M.C., Solidification Processing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
59.Kurz, W. and Fisher, D.J., Fundamentals of Solidification (Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1986).Google Scholar
60.Langer, J.S., in Principles of Solidification and Materials Processing, Vol. 1, edited by Trivedi, R., Sekhar, J.A., and Mazumdar, J. (Oxford & JBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, 1989) p. 1.Google Scholar
61.Glicksman, M.E., in Reference 60, p. 11.Google Scholar
62.Mullins, W.W. and Sekerka, R.F., J. Appl. Phys. 35 (1964) p. 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63.Trivedi, R., Acta Metall. 18 (1970) p. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64.Kurz, W. and Fisher, D.J., Acta Metall. 29 (1981) p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65.Kurz, W., Giovanola, B., and Trivedi, R., Acta Metall. 34 (1986) p. 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66.Trivedi, R. and Kurz, W., in Reference 65, p. 1663.Google Scholar
67.and, J.S. LangerMuller-Krumbhaar, H., Acta Metall. 26 (1978) p. 1681.Google Scholar
68.Brooks, J.A. and Baskes, M.I., in Reference 11, p. 93.Google Scholar
69.Lippold, J.C. and Savage, W.F., Modeling of Casting and Welding Processes, edited by Brody, H.D. and Apelian, D. (Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1980) p. 443.Google Scholar
70.Scheil, E., Z. Metallk. 34 (1942) p. 70.Google Scholar
71.Brody, H.D. and Flemings, M.C., Trans. AIME 236 (1966) p. 615.Google Scholar
72.Clyne, T.W. and Kurz, W., Metall. Trans. A 12A (1981) p. 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73.Savage, W.F., Weld. World 18 (1980) p. 89.Google Scholar
74.Davies, G.J. and Garland, J.G., Int. Met. Rev. 20 (1975) p. 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75.David, S.A. and Liu, C.T., in Reference 15, p. 157s.Google Scholar
76.Vitek, J.M. and David, S.A., The Metal Science of Joining, edited by Cieslak, M.J., Perepezko, J.H., Kang, S., and Glicksman, M.E. (The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1992) p. 115.Google Scholar
77.Elmer, J.W., in Reference 76, p. 123.Google Scholar
78.Vitek, J.M. and David, S.A., in Proc. Laser Processing Symposium (The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1993) to be published.Google Scholar
79.Easterling, K.E. in Reference 6, p. 163.Google Scholar
80.Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. and Svensson, L.E., in Reference 79, p. 109.Google Scholar
81.Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H., Bainite in Steels (Institute of Materials, London, 1992).Google Scholar
82.Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H., in Reference 4, p. 189.Google Scholar
83.Watt, D.F., Coon, L., Bibby, M., Goldak, J., and Henwood, C., Acta Metall. 36 (1988) p. 3029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84.Henwood, C., Bibby, M., Goldak, J., and Watt, D., in Reference 83, p. 3037.Google Scholar
85.Shen, Y., Radhakrishnan, B., and Thompson, R.G., in Reference 5, p. 259.Google Scholar
86.Welding Handbook, 8th ed., Chapter 7, Masubuchi, K., Blodgett, O.W., Matsui, S., Ross, F.P., Rudd, C.O., and Tsai, C.L. (American Welding Society, Miami, FL, 1989).Google Scholar
87.Hepworth, J.K., Finite Element Calculation of Residual Stresses in Welds, (Proc. Int. Conf. Numerical Method s for Non-Linear Problems, Pineridge Prep, Swansea, Wales, September 1980) p. 51.Google Scholar
88.Ortega, A.R., Bertram, L.A., Fuchs, E.A., Mahin, K., and Nelson, D.V, in Reference 5, p. 89.Google Scholar
89.McDill, J.M.J., Oddy, A.S., and Goldak, J.A., in Reference 5, p. 105.Google Scholar
90.Goldak, J., in Reference 4, p. 72.Google Scholar
91.Mahin, K.W., Winters, W., Krafcik, J., Holden, T., Hosbons, R., and MacEwen, S., in Reference 4, p. 83.Google Scholar
92.Tekriwal, P. and Mazumder, J., in Reference 4, p. 91.Google Scholar
93.Oddy, A.S., Goldak, J.A., and McDill, J.M.J., in Reference 4, p. 97.Google Scholar