Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:00:44.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fundamental Studies of Plutonium Aging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Brian D. Wirth ,
Adam J. Schwartz ,
Michael J. Fluss ,
Maria J. Caturla ,
Mark A. Wall  and
Wilhelm G. Wolfer
Get access

Extract

Plutonium metallurgy lies at the heart of science-based stockpile stewardship. One aspect is concerned with developing predictive capabilities to describe the properties of stockpile materials, including an assessment of microstructural changes with age. Yet, the complex behavior of plutonium, which results from the competition of its 5f electrons between a localized (atomic-like or bound) state and an itinerant (delocalized bonding) state, has been challenging materials scientists and physicists for the better part of five decades. Although far from quantitatively absolute, electronic-structure theory provides a description of plutonium that helps explain the unusual properties of plutonium, as recently reviewed by Hecker. (See also the article by Hecker in this issue.) The electronic structure of plutonium includes five 5f electrons with a very narrow energy width of the 5f conduction band, which results in a delicate balance between itinerant electrons (in the conduction band) or localized electrons and multiple lowenergy electronic configurations with nearly equivalent energies. These complex electronic characteristics give rise to unique macroscopic properties of plutonium that include six allotropes (at ambient pressure) with very close free energies but large (∼25%) density differences, a lowsymmetry monoclinic ground state rather than a high-symmetry close-packed cubic phase, compression upon melting (like water), low melting temperature, anomalous temperature-dependence of electrical resistance, and radioactive decay. Additionally, plutonium readily oxidizes and is toxic; therefore, the handling and fundamental research of this element is very challenging due to environmental, safety, and health concerns.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 26 , Issue 9: Challenges in Plutonium and Actinide Materials Science , September 2001 , pp. 679 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Drell, S.D., Phys. Today. 12 (2000) p.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Jeanloz, R., Phys. Today. 12 (2000) p.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hecker, S.S. and Martz, J.C., in Los Alamos Science, No.26, edited by Cooper, N.G. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000) p.238.Google Scholar
4.Boring, A.M. and Smith, J.L., in Los Alamos Science, No. 26, edited by Cooper, N.G. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000) p.90.Google Scholar
5.Hecker, S.S., in Los Alamos Science, No.26, edited by Cooper, N.G. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000) p.290.Google Scholar
6. For example, see Los Alamos Science, No. 26, edited by Cooper, N.G. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000).Google Scholar
7.Peterson, D.E. and Kassner, M.E., in Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed., edited by Massalski, T.B., Okamoto, H., Subramanian, P.R., and Kacprzak, L. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990) p.1843.Google Scholar
8.Hecker, S.S. and Timofeeva, L.F., in Los Alamos Science, No. 26, edited by Cooper, N.G. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000) p.244.Google Scholar
9.Wick, O.J., ed., Plutonium Handbook: A guide to the Technology (American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL, 1980).Google Scholar
10.Ellinger, F.H., Land, C.C., and Struebing, V.O., J.Nucl. Mater. 12 (1964) p.226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hocheid, B., Tanon, A., Bedere, S., Depres, J., Hay, S., and Miar, F., in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Plutonium, edited by Kay, A.I. and Waldron, M.B. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1965) p.321.Google Scholar
12.Chebotarev, N.T., Smotriskaya, E.S., Andrianov, M.A., and Kostyuk, O.E., in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Plutonium and Other Actinides, edited by Blank, H. and Lindner, R. (North-Holland, New York, 1975) p.37.Google Scholar
13.Adler, P.H., Metal. Trans. A 22A (1991) p.2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Timofeeva, L.F., in Proc. Int. Conf. on Ageing Studies and Lifetime Extension of Materials, edited by Mallinson, L.G. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000) p.191.Google Scholar
15.Wolfer, W.G., in Los Alamos Science, No. 26, edited by Cooper, N.G. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000) p.274.Google Scholar
16.Odette, G.R., J.Nucl. Mater. 85/86 (1979) p.533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mansur, L.K. and Bloom, E.E., J. Met. 34 (1982) p.23.Google Scholar
18.Singh, B.N. and Foreman, A.J.E., J. Nucl. Mater. 122/123 (1984) p.537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Andresen, P.L., Ford, F.P., Murphy, S.M., and Perks, J.M., in Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors (NACE International, Houston, 1990) p.1.Google Scholar
20.Odette, G.R., Wirth, B.D., Bacon, D.J., and Ghoniem, N.M., MRS Bull. 26 (3) (2001) p.176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P., and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, Vol. 1, edited by Ziegler, J.F. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
22.and, R.S. AverbackRubia, T. Diaz de la, in Solid State Physics, Vol.51, edited by Spaepen, F. and Ehrenreich, H. (Academic Press, New York, 1997) p.281.Google Scholar
23.Bacon, D.J., J.Nucl. Mater. 251 (1997) p.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Stoller, R.E., JOM 48 (1996) p.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Norgett, M.J., Robinson, M.T., and Torrens, I.M., Nucl. Eng. Des. 33 (1975) p.50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Ehrart, P., in Atomic Defects in Metals, Landolt–Bornstein New Series Group III/25, edited by Ullmaier, H. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).Google Scholar
27.Wigley, D.A., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 284 (1965) p.344.Google Scholar
28.Adams, J.B. and Wolfer, W.G., J. Nucl. Mater. 166 (1989) p.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Colmenares, C., Howell, R.H., Ancheta, D., Cowen, T., Hanafee, J., and Sterne, P., First Positron Annihilation Lifetime Measurement of Pu, Report No. UCRL-ID-126003 (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Howell, R.H. (personal communication).Google Scholar
31.Rohr, D.L., Staudhammer, K.P., and Johnson, K.A., Development of Plutonium Transmission Electron Microscopy, Report No. LA-9965-MS (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1984).Google Scholar
32.Zocco, T.G. and Rohr, D.L., in Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy of Materials, edited by Bravman, J.C., Anderson, R.M., and McDonald, M.L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 115, Pittsburgh, 1988) p.259.Google Scholar