Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:47:24.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Construction Materials: From Innovation to Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article serves to introduce the May 2004 issue of MRS Bulletin on Construction Materials: From Innovation to Conservation. By volume, building materials are by far the most widely used type of materials. The most common construction materials—concrete and wood—are paradigms of complex and hierarchical materials, with a microstructure extending quasi-continuously down to the nanoscale. In the past, most improvements have been obtained by modifying the microstructure at the largest scales, for instance, by reducing the macroporosity. Recent advances in our understanding of the interactions and microstructure development show that the major levers for improvement from now on will rely on surface and colloid science and the science of complex materials, often at the nanoscale. This can lead to remarkable properties, such as self-compaction and ultrahigh strength, and even new functionality, such as self-cleaning through photocatalysis. Construction materials face a wide range of challenges today, many of which are linked to the need for more sustainable development: reducing the consumption of raw materials, reducing the energy used in processing, and increasing service life. In many parts of the world, there is also an increasing need to repair, rehabilitate, and conserve old buildings. The articles in this issue touch on these challenges as well as the advances being made in construction materials through materials research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

References

1Israel Science and Technology home page, http://www.science.co.il. On the home page, enter “earth's crust” in the “search” box (accessed April 2004).Google Scholar
2See the theme “Advanced Cement-Based Materials,” MRS Bull., XVIII (3) (March 1993) p. 33.Google Scholar
3Vallée, F., Ruot, B., Bonafous, L., Guillot, L., Pimpinelli, N., Cassar, L., Strini, A., Mapelli, E., Schiavi, L., Gobin, C., Andre, H., Moussiopoulos, N., Papadopoulos, A., Bartzis, J., Maggos, T., McIntyre, R., Lehaut-Burnouf, C., Henrichsen, A., Laugesen, P., Amadelli, R., Kotzias, D., and Pichat, P., “Innovative Self-Cleaning and De-Polluting Facade Surfaces,” presented at CIB World Building Congress 2004, May 2–7, 2004, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
4“Why Concrete?” Environmental Council of Concrete Organizations Web site, http://www.ecco.org/ (accessed April 2004).Google Scholar
5Comparative energy costs from Eyerer, P. and Reinhardt, H. W., Ökologische Bilanzierung von Baustoffen und Gebäuden (GaBi-Projekt final report) (Birkhouser-Verlag, Basel, 2000); Okobilanzen Holz (Deustchen Gesellschaft fur Holzforschung, Munich, April 1997); H.W. Reinhardt et al., Sachstandbericht Nachhaltig Bauen mit Beton, Deutscher Ausschuβ für Stahlbeton Schriftenreihe 521 (Beuth, Berlin, 2001); H. Glässer, H.K. Gründler, and H.J.F. Heitz, Ökologische Betrachtung und Bilanzierung von Wärmedammglas, Ergbnisbetrachtung (internal study) (Vegla GmBh, Aachen, Germany, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar