Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Article contents

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2020

François Diaz-Maurin
Affiliation:
Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Amphos 21 Consulting SL, C/ Venezuela 103, 08019 Barcelona, Spain
Rodney C. Ewing
Affiliation:
Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Corresponding

Abstract

Recent efforts have been made toward the integration of the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the United States. The back-end integration seeks to address several management challenges: 1) current storage practices are not optimized for transport and disposal; 2) the impact of interim storage on the disposal strategy needs to be evaluated; and 3) the back-end is affected by—and affects—nuclear fuel cycle and energy policy choices. The back-end integration accounts for the various processes of nuclear waste management—onsite storage, consolidated storage, transport and geological disposal. Ideally, these processes should be fully coupled so that benefits and impacts can be assessed at the level of the full fuel cycle. The paper summarizes the causes and consequences of the absence of integration at the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S., critically reviews ongoing integration efforts, and suggests a framework that would support the back-end integration.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

References

U.S. NWTRB, Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy (United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Arlington, VA, 2009).Google Scholar
Carter, J., Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Report (Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, USA, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechard, R.P., Price, L.L., and Kalinina, E.A., Integrating Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Generation to Disposal (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2015), p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (2019).Google Scholar
Bonano, E.J., Kalinina, E.A., and Swift, P.N., MRS Advances 3, 991 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, J., Duro, L., and Diaz-Maurin, F., in Advances in Nuclear Fuel Chemistry 1st Edition edited Piro, byM. (Woodhead Publishing, 2020), p. 450.Google Scholar
Ewing, R.C. and Weber, W.J., in Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability edited by Ginley, D.S. and Cahen, D. (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 178193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F., Sun, H.C., Yu, J., and Ewing, R.C., MRS Advances 4, 959 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F. and Ewing, R.C., Sustainability 10, 4390 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reset Steering Committee, Reset of America’s Nuclear Waste Management Strategy and Policy (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2018).Google Scholar
Johnson, C.A., Radioactive Waste Management: A Bibliography for the Integrated Data Base Program (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA), 1981).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Integrated Data Base Report-1996: U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics (Washington, D.C., 1997), p. 263.Google Scholar
Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 14.Google Scholar
Danker, W.J. and Williams, J.R., in High Level Radioactive Waste Management (American Nuclear Society, Las Vegas, NV (USA), 1990).Google Scholar
Jarrell, J., in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 29.Google Scholar
Joseph, R., Craig, B., Cumberland, R.M., Trail, C., Aubin, J. St., Olson, C., Vander Wal, L., Vanderzee, E., Jarrell, J., and Kalinina, E., in (Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 2019).Google Scholar
Abkowitz, M. and Bickford, E., in (American Nuclear Society, Charleston, SC, USA, 2015).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project, Small Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (STAD) Canister System For Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2015), p. 2.Google Scholar
Howard, R., in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 20.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Designing a Consent-Based Siting Process: Summary of Public Input (Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 98.Google Scholar
Dewoghélaëre, J., Hériard-Dubreuil, G., and Marignac, Y., Civil Society Views on the Content and Governance of a Joint Research Programme (JOPRAD - Towards a Joint Programming on Radioactive Waste Disposal. (EU project H2020-Euratom-653951), Paris, France, 2017), p. 11.Google Scholar
Brunnengräber, A. and Di Nucci, M.R., editors, Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, B.D., Andrén, M., and Strandberg, U., Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1, 13 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliskey, A., Alessa, L., Wandersee, S., Williams, P., Trammell, J., Powell, J., Grunblatt, J., and Wipfli, M., Sustain Sci 12, 293 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayumi, K. and Giampietro, M., Ecological Indicators 47, 50 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giampietro, M., Aspinall, R.J., Ramos-Martin, J., and Bukkens, S.G.F., editors, Resource Accounting for Sustainability Assessment: The Nexus between Energy, Food, Water and Land Use (Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F. and Giampietro, M., Energy 49, 162 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porte, T.R. and Metlay, D.S., Public Administration Review 56, 341 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S.E., Stoutenborough, J.W., and Vedlitz, A., Understanding Trust in Government: Environmental Sustainability, Fracking, and Public Opinion in American Politics (Routledge, New York, NY, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M., Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power, and Energy Choices: Public Preferences, Perceptions, and Trust (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Flynn, J.H., and Layman, M., Science 254, 1603 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F., Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74, 335 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T.M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995).Google Scholar
Chifari, R., Lo Piano, S., Bukkens, S.G.F., and Giampietro, M., Ecological Indicators (2016).Google Scholar
Davis, L.E., Knopman, D., Greenberg, M.D., Miller, L.E., and Doll, A., Choosing a New Organization for Management and Disposition of Commercial and Defense High-Level Radioactive Materials (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2012).Google Scholar
Flynn, J., Kasperson, R., Kunreuther, H., and Slovic, P., Issues in Science and Technology 8, 42 (1992).Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 331 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 11th February 2020 - 18th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Open access
Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-2nq4t Total loading time: 0.347 Render date: 2021-01-18T12:06:26.330Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "1", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Mon Jan 18 2021 12:03:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *