Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:33:59.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infrared pixel based on Seebeck nanoantennas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

Francisco Javier González*
Affiliation:
Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando FL 32789 USA Truventic LLC, 1209 W. Gore St. Orlando FL 32805 USA LANCYTT/UASLP, Sierra Leona 550, Lomas 2a Sección, SLP, 78210, Mexico
Nagendra Dhakal
Affiliation:
Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando FL 32789 USA
Tommy Boykin II
Affiliation:
Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando FL 32789 USA
Javier Méndez-Lozoya
Affiliation:
LANCYTT/UASLP, Sierra Leona 550, Lomas 2a Sección, SLP, 78210, Mexico
Robert E. Peale
Affiliation:
Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando FL 32789 USA Truventic LLC, 1209 W. Gore St. Orlando FL 32805 USA
Get access

Abstract

Bolometric arrays dominate in commercial terahertz and millimeter wave imagers. Bolometers tend to be slow and require an operating bias that increases the power budget. This paper presents first results on antenna-coupled thermo-electric junction detectors, a potentially attractive alternative to microbolometers. The nanoscale junctions have small thermal mass and can be much faster than bolometers. These junctions are heated by currents excited in spectrally-selective antennas and generate a voltage based on the Seebeck effect without any externally applied power. A pixel comprising a series array of antenna coupled junctions with peak response at 7.5 THz (40 μm wavelength) is designed and experimentally demonstrated. Responsivity of 5 MV/W, 500 Hz chopping frequency, and D* of 3.5 x 1010 Jones are demonstrated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balanis, C. A., Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
Biagioni, P., Huang, J-S. and Hecht, B., Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 024402 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, F. J., “Optical Antennas,” in Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Webster, J. (ed.) (Wiley, 2015) pp. 1-5.Google Scholar
González, F.J. and Boreman, G., "Comparison of dipole, bowtie, spiral and log-periodic IR antennas," Infrared Phys. and Technol. 46, 418 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagae, M., “Response time of metal-insulator-metal tunnel junctions,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 11, 1611 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumeaux, C., Alda, J., and Boreman, G. D., “Lithographic antennas at visible frequencies,” Opt. Lett. 24, 1629 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briones, E., Kuri, C., Cortes-Mestizo, I., Briones, J., and Vilchis, H., “Numerical conversion efficiency of thermally isolated Seebeck nanoantennas,” AIP Advances 6, 115018 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Evan M., Panjwani, Deep, Ginn, James, Warren, Andrew P., Long, Christopher, Figueiredo, Pedro, Smith, Christian, Nath, Janardan, Perlstein, Joshua, Walter, Nick, Hirschmugl, Carol, Peale, Robert E., and Shelton, David, “Dual band sensitivity enhancements of a VOx microbolometer array using a patterned gold black absorber,” Applied Optics 55, 2071 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar