Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:48:53.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved Efficiency and Stability of Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanoparticles by Photodeposition of Co-Catalysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Philip Kalisman*
Affiliation:
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Department of Chemistry Haifa, 32000, Israel
Lilac Amirav
Affiliation:
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Department of Chemistry Haifa, 32000, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The production of hydrogen by photocatalytic water splitting is a potentially clean and renewable source for hydrogen fuel. Cadmium chalcogenides are attractive photocatalysts because they have the potential to convert water into hydrogen and oxygen using photons in the visible spectrum. Cadmium sulfide rods with embedded cadmium selenide quantum dots (CdSe@CdS) are particularly attractive because of their high molar absorptivity in the UV-blue spectral region, and their energy bands can be tuned; however, two crucial drawbacks hinder the implementation of these materials in wide spread use: poor charge transfer and photochemical instability.

Utilizing photochemical deposition of co-catalysts onto CdSe@CdS substrates we can address each of these weaknesses. We report how novel co-catalyst morphologies can greatly increase efficiency for the water reduction half-reaction. We also report photostability for CdSe@CdS under high intensity 455nm light (a wavelength at which photocatalytic water splitting by CdSe@CdS is possible) by growing metal oxide co-catalysts on the surface of our rods.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Donegá, C.M., Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 15121546 (2011)Google Scholar
Yu, W.W., Qu, L., Guo, W. and Peng, X., Chem. Mater. 15, 28542860 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amirav, L. and Alivisatos, A. P., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 10511054, (2010)Google Scholar
Nakibli, Y., Kalisman, P., and Amirav, L., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 22652268 (2015)Google Scholar
Kalisman, P., Kauffmann, Y., and Amirav, L., J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 2613265 (2015)Google Scholar
Aronovitch, E. et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 37603764 Google Scholar
Ge, Q., Song, C. and Wang, L., Comput. Mater. Sci. 35, 247253 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. J., Read, C. G., Schaak, R. E., J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (16), 89528959 (2015)Google Scholar
Kalisman, P., et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 1967919682 (2015)Google Scholar
Simon, T. et al., Nat. Mat., 13, 10131018 (2014)Google Scholar