Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:27:58.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Nonionic Conjugated Matrix Polymer and P-Dopant on Carbon Nanotube Aggregation and Thermoelectric Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2018

Hui Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 206 Maryland Hall, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218
Jiyuan Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 206 Maryland Hall, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218
Toshiyuki Sato
Affiliation:
NAMICS Corporation, NTC, 3993 Nigorikawa, Kita-ku, Niigata-City, Japan 950-3131
Paul Czubarow
Affiliation:
eM-TECH, Inc., 200 Turnpike Rd. Suite 3, Southborough, MA 01772
Howard E. Katz*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 206 Maryland Hall, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218
*
*Corresponding author: hekatz@jhu.edu
Get access

Abstract

The properties of a mixed metallic and semiconducting carbon nanotube (CNT) sample dispersed in nonconjugated poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and conjugated poly(bisdodecylquaterthiophene) (PQT12) were compared, with and without p-doping by NOBF4. The CNTs were distributed much more evenly, and percolated at much lower concentrations (ca. 2%), in the PMMA as compared to PQT12, as judged by optical microscopy and electronic conductivity measurements. Seebeck coefficients (S) obtained on the PMMA samples indicated dominance by the metallic fraction, with values <10 µV/K. Composites made with PQT12 alone showed slightly higher values of S, but with the addition of 3 wt % dopant, S increased markedly to about 100 µV/K at 5-10% CNT fractions, while conductivity was unexpectedly low. As the CNT fraction in the doped sample was increased to 25-30%, conductivity approached that of the comparable concentration of CNTs in PMMA, while S, ca. 15 µV/K, was still higher than that measured in PMMA. The observations inform interpretations of CNT-polymer composite thermoelectric data, pointing out the roles of conjugated main chains and added dopants in modulating contributions of CNTs to thermoelectric composite performance.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Xu, W., and Zhu, D. B., Organic Thermoelectric Materials: Emeging Green energy Materials Converting Heat to Electricity Dirctly and Efficiently, Adv. Mater. 26, 6829 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrail, B.T., Sehirlioglu, A., and Pentzer, E., Polymer Composites for Thermoelectric Applications, Ang. Chemie. 54, 1710 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, J.L., Ferguson, A.J., Cho, C., and Grunlan, J.C., Carbon Nanotube-based Thermoelectric Materials and Devices, Adv. Mater. 30 ,1704386 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H., DeCoster, M.E., Ireland, R.M., Song, J., Hopkins, P.E., and Katz, H.E., Modificatio of the Bis(dodecylquaterthiophene) Structure for High and Predominantly Nonionic Conductivity with Matched Dopants, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11149 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakai, Y., Honda, K., Yanagi, K., Kataura, H., Kato, T., Yamamoto, T., and Maniwa, Y., Giant Seebeck Coefficient in Single-wall Carbon Nanotube Film, https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1401/1401.7469.pdf.Google Scholar
Nonoguchi, Y., Ohashi, K., Kanazawa, R., Ashiba, K., Hata, K., Nakagawa, T., Adachi, C., Tanase, T., and kawai, T., Systematic Conversion of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes into n-Type Thernoelectric Materials by Molecular Dopants, Sci. Rep. 3, 344 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed