Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:38:02.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legacies of Fascism: architecture, heritage and memory in contemporary Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2017

Hannah Malone
Hannah Malone*
Affiliation:
Friedrich Meinecke Institute, Free University of Berlin, Germany
*
*Email: hannaholiviamalone@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how Italy has dealt with the physical remains of the Fascist regime, as a window onto Italian attitudes to the past. The ventennio left indelible marks on Italy’s cities in the form of urban projects, individual buildings, monuments, plaques and street names. In effect, the survival of physical traces contrasts with the hazy memories of Fascism that exist within the Italian collective consciousness. Conspicuous, yet mostly ignored, Italy’s Fascist heritage is hidden in plain sight. However, from the 1990s, buildings associated with the regime have sparked a number of debates regarding the public memory of Fascism. Although these debates present an opportunity to re-examine history, they may also be symptomatic of a crisis in the Italian polity and of attempts to rehabilitate Fascism through historical revisionism.

Italian summary

L’articolo esamina come sono stati gestiti in Italia i resti materiali del regime fascista, analizzandoli come riflesso degli atteggiamenti degli italiani verso il loro passato. Il ventennio lasciò tracce indelebili sulle città italiane sotto forma di edifici, progetti urbanistici, monumenti, targhe e nomi stradali. In effetti, la sopravvivenza di simboli del Fascismo contrasta con i vaghi ricordi del periodo fascista che permangono nella coscienza collettiva degli italiani. Cospicua, ma per lo più ignorata, l’architettura fascista è nascosta sotto gli occhi di tutti. Ciononostante, a partire dagli anni Novanta, l’eredità architettonica del regime ha suscitato numerose polemiche riguardo alla memoria pubblica del Fascismo. Da un lato questi dibatti potrebbero offrire un’opportunità per riesaminare la storia, ma dall’altro potrebbero anche essere sintomatici di una crisi nella politica italiana o di tentativi di riabilitare il Fascismo attraverso il revisionismo storico.

Keywords

FascismChristopher Dugganlegacy, defascistisationarchitectureBenito Mussolini
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 22 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue: The Force of History: Modern Italian Historiography and the Legacy of Christopher Duggan , November 2017 , pp. 445 - 470
Copyright
© 2017 Association for the Study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthurs, J. 2010. “Fascism as “Heritage” in Contemporary Italy.” In Italy Today: the Sick Man of Europe, edited by A. Mammone, and G. A. Veltri, 114–128. London: Routledge (Published in Italian as Arthurs, J, 2011. ‘Il fascismo come “eredità” nell’Italia contemporanea’. In Un Paese normale? Saggi sull’Italia contemporanea, edited by A. Mammone, N. Tranfaglia, and G. A. Veltri, 209–232. Milan: Dalai Editore.).Google Scholar
Arthurs, J. 2012. Excavating Modernity: The Roman Past in Fascist Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Arthurs, J. 2014. ‘“Voleva essere Cesare, morì Vespasiano”: the Afterlives of Mussolini’s Rome.’ Civiltà Romana: Rivista pluridisciplinare di studi su Roma antica e le sue interpretazioni I:283–302.Google Scholar
Battini, M. 2003. Peccati di memoria: La mancata Norimberga. Bari: Laterza. (Published in English as Battini, M. 2007. The Missing Italian Nuremberg: Cultural Amnesia and Postwar Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.)Google Scholar
Benton, T. 1999. “From the Arengario to the Lictor’s Axe: Memories of Italian Fascism.” In Material Memories: Design and Evocation, edited by M. Kwint, C. Breward, and J. Aynsley, 199–218. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Bosworth, R.J.B., and Dogliani, P. 2001. “Introduction.” In Italian Fascism: History, Memory, Representation. 1–9. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Caporilli, M., and Simeoni, F., (eds.). 1990. Il Foro Italico e lo Stadio Olimpico: immagini dalla storia. Rome: Tomo edizioni.Google Scholar
Carter, N., and Martin, S. 2017. “The Management and Memory of Fascist Monumental Art in Postwar and Contemporary Italy: the Case of Luigi Montanarini’s Apotheosis of Fascism.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 22 (3): 338–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents. 1999. “Epigraphy and its Afterlife: Reusing, Rediscovering, Reinventing, and Revitalising Ancient Inscriptions.” Newsletter 7, Spring.Google Scholar
Cillis, A. R., and Venuti, L. 2016. ‘Colosseo quadrato per promuovere il Roma Pride, dietrofront di Fendi: “Uso autorizzato, equivoco chiarito”’. Repubblica, 9 June.Google Scholar
Ciucci, G. 1982. “Il dibattito sull’architettura e la città fascista.” In Storia dell’arte italiano VII: Il Novecento , edited by F. Zeri. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ciucci, G. 1989. Gli architetti e il fascismo: architettura e città 1922–1944. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Corner, P. 2002. “Italian Fascism: Whatever Happened to Dictatorship?” The Journal of Modern History 74 (2): 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, P. 2005. “La percezione del fascismo nell’Italia di oggi.” Giornale di Storia Contemporanea 8 (1): 176–183.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera . 8 March 2008. ‘Ara Pacis, Alemanno “Stop al progetto”’.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera . 17 April 2015. ‘Boldrini: “Cancellare la scritta Dux dall’obelisco di Mussolini”. Bufera sulla presidente della Camera’.Google Scholar
D’Albergo, L. 2017a. ‘Roma, L’ex palazzo Gil: Un pachiderma abbandonato nel cuore di Trastevere’. La Repubblica, 13 April.Google Scholar
D’Albergo, L. 2017b. ‘Roma, ex Gil di Trastevere: altri due milioni dalla Regione per la riapertura a luglio’. La Repubblica, 22 April.Google Scholar
D’Amelio, M. G. 2009. L’obelisco marmoreo del Foro Italico a Roma: storia, immagini e note tecniche. Rome: Palombi.Google Scholar
De Felice, R. 1995. Rosso e Nero. Milan: Baldini & Castoldi.Google Scholar
Di Corrado, V. 2017. ‘Forza Nuova occupa l’ex Gil di Trastevere, restaurato e poi abbandonato’, Il Tempo, 22 April.Google Scholar
Dondi, M. 2001. “The Fascist Mentality after Fascism.” In Italian Fascism: History, Memory, Representation, edited by R.J.B. Bosworth, and P. Dogliani, 141–160. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Etlin, R. 1991. Modernism in Italian architecture, 1890-1940. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evangelisti, M. 2008. ‘Alemanno: “Ara Pacis, via quella teca”. Il Messaggero. 1 May.Google Scholar
Fiorentino, F. 2015. ‘Apre il “Colosseo quadrato”, la sfida (vinta) di Fendi’. Corriere della Sera, 23 October. Available at: http://www.corriere.it/moda/news/15_ottobre_22/roma-apre-colosseo-quadrato-sfida-vinta-fendi-ff26d5e6-78ef-11e5-95d8-a1e2a86e0e17.shtml. (Accessed 15 March 2017).Google Scholar
Fogu, C. 2006. “Italiani brava gente: the Legacy of Fascist Historical Culture on Italian Politics of Memory.” In The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe, edited by R.N. Lebow, W. Kansteiner, and C. Fogu, 147–176. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Follain, J. 2008. ‘Italy Needed Fascism, says the New Duce’. The Sunday Times, 11 May.Google Scholar
Foot, J. 2009. Italy’s Divided Memory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Franzinelli, M. 2016. L’Amnistia Togliatti: 1946. Colpo di spugna sui crimini fascisti. Milan: Feltrinelli Editore.Google Scholar
Gallerano, N. 1988. “Gli italiani in guerra 1940–1943: appunti per una ricerca.” In L’Italia nella Seconda Guerra Mondiale e nella Resistenza, edited by F. Ferratini Tosi, G. Grassi, and M. Legnani, 316–321. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Gentile, E. 2007. Il fascismo di pietra. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Greco, A., and Santuccio, S. 1991. Foro italico. Rome: Multigrafica.Google Scholar
Gundle, S. 2013. “The Aftermath of the Mussolini Cult: History, Nostalgia and Popular Culture.” In The Cult of the Duce: Mussolini and the Italians, edited by S. Gundle, C. Duggan, and G. Pieri, 241–256. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hatherley, O. 2015. ‘Fendi vidi vici: when Fashion flirts with Fascism’. Architectural Review, online. https://www.architectural-review.com/rethink/viewpoints/fendi-vidi-vici-when-fashion-flirts-with-fascism/8679074.article. (Accessed 15 March 2017).Google Scholar
Hökerberg, H. 2017. “‘The Monument to Victory in Bolzano: Desacralisation of a Fascist Relic’.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (8): 759–774.Google Scholar
Il Messaggero , 17 April 2015. ‘Laura Boldrini: “Togliere la scritta ‘Mussolini Dux’ dall’obelisco del Foro Italico’.Google Scholar
Il Tempo , 17 April 2015. ‘La talebana Boldrini Via “Dux” dall’obelisco’.Google Scholar
Il Tempo , 18 April 2015. ‘Boldrini cancellata a sinistra’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallis, A. 2011. ‘“Framing” Romanità: the Celebrations for the Bimillenario Augusteo and the Augusteo-Ara Pacis Project.’ Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 46, no. 4: 809–831.Google Scholar
Kallis, A. 2014. The Third Rome, 1922–43: The Making of the Fascist Capital. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kirchgaessner, S. 2015. ‘Fendi Rejects Criticism over New HQ in Mussolini Propaganda Building’. The Guardian, 22 October.Google Scholar
Kirchgaessner, S. 2016. ‘Fendi Forced to Retract Opposition to Roma Pride Using Image of HQ’. The Guardian, 9 June.Google Scholar
La Repubblica , 12 May 2008. ‘Roma, Sgarbi consulente di Alemanno Via il muro alla teca dell’Ara Pacis’.Google Scholar
La Repubblica , 17 April 2015. ‘Fascismo, Boldrini: “Togliere la scritta Dux dall’obelisco del Foro”’.Google Scholar
La Repubblica , 18 April 2015. ‘Orfini: la scritta Dux non va cancellata’.Google Scholar
La Repubblica , 21 April 2006. ‘L’Ara Pacis riapre dopo sette anni. Ma è scontro sulla teca di Meier’.Google Scholar
La Repubblica , 22 April 2006. ‘Ara pacis, la teca di Meier una gesta tra le polemiche’.Google Scholar
La Stampa , 11 August 1960. ‘Chiassare di missini a Roma per le scritte al Foro Italico’.Google Scholar
Ladd, B. 1997. The Ghosts of Berlin: Confronting German History in the Urban Landscape. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luperini, S. 2015. ‘E l’icona metafisica ritorna alla città’. La Repubblica, 24 October.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, S. 2004. La crisi dell’antifascismo. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, S. 2011. “(1998). Il corpo del duce .” Un cadavere tra immaginazione, storia e memoria. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S. 2006. “Undesirable Heritage: Fascist Material Culture and Historical Consciousness in Nuremberg.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12, 1: 9–28.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S. 2009. Difficult Heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malone, H. Forthcoming 2017. “Marcello Piacentini: a Case of Controversial Heritage.” In Architecture as Propaganda in Twentieth-Century Totalitarian Regimes. History and Heritage. Rome: Suecoromana.Google Scholar
Mammone, A. 2006. “A Daily Revision of the Past: Fascism, Anti-Fascism, and Memory in Contemporary Italy.” Modern Italy 11 (2): 211–226.Google Scholar
Martin, S. 2017. “Rebranding the Republic: Rome and the 1960 Olympic Games.” European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire 24, 1: 58–79.Google Scholar
Masia, L., Matteoni, D., Mei, P., and Beck Peccoz, M. (eds.). 2007. Il parco del Foro Italico: la storia, lo sport, i progetti. Cinisello Balsamo: Silvana.Google Scholar
Maulsby, L. M. 2014. “Drinking from the River Lethe: Case del Fascio and the Legacy of Fascism in Postwar Italy.” Future Anterior 11 (2): 18–39.Google Scholar
Nelis, J. 2007. ‘Constructing Fascist Identity: Benito Mussolini and the Myth of “Romanità.”’ The Classical World 100 (4): 391–415.Google Scholar
Nicoloso, P. 2012. Architetture per un’identità italiana: Progetti e opere per fare gli italiani fascisti. Udine: P. Gaspari.Google Scholar
Page, M. 2014. ‘The Roman architecture of Mussolini, still standing’. Boston Globe, 13 July. https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2014/07/12/the-roman-architecture-mussolini-still-standing/csZ70EN2fTnUUNqX0kRM9K/story.html (accessed 6 July 2017).Google Scholar
Pamphili, C.T. 2015. ‘Fendi, il Colosseo Quadrato e le polemiche’. Artribune, 31 October.Google Scholar
Pavone, C. 1995. Alle origini della Repubblica: scritti su Fascismo, antifascismo e continuità dello stato. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Pavone, C. 2000. “Negazionismi, rimozioni, revisionismi: storia o politica?” In Fascismo e antifascismo. Rimozioni, revisioni, negazioni, edited by A. Boldrini, and E. Collotti Istituto nazionale per la storia del movimento di liberazione in Italia, et al., 15–42. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Petrusewicz, M. 2004. “Preface. The Hidden Pages of Contemporary Italian History: War Crimes, War Guilt and Collective Memory.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 9, 3: 269–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieri, G. 2013. “The Destiny of the Art and Artefacts.” In The Cult of the Duce: Mussolini and the Italians, edited by S. Gundle, C. Duggan, and G. Pieri, 227–240. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pooley, E. 2013. “Mussolini and the City of Rome.” In The Cult of the Duce: Mussolini and the Italians, edited by S. Gundle, C. Duggan, and G. Pieri, 209–224. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, G. D. 2000. Munich and Memory: Architecture, Monuments, and the Legacy of the Third Reich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, G. D., and Jaskot, P. B. 2008. Beyond Berlin: Twelve German Cities Confront the Nazi Past. Detroit: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Roy Domenico, R.P. 1991. Italian Fascists on Trial, 1943–1948. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sabatini, G. 2015. ‘La Boldrini vuole abbattere la stele di Mussolini. Come i talebani dell’Isis’. Secolo d’Italia, 17 April.Google Scholar
Samuels, J. 2015. “Coming “To Terms” with Sicily’s Fascist Past.” In Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage, edited by T. Rico, and K. Lafrenz Samuels, 111–128. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Santuccio, S., ed. 2005. Le case e il foro. L’architettura dell’ONB. Florence: Alinea.Google Scholar
Seabrook, J. 2005. ‘Roman Renovation: Can Richard Meier undo what Augustus and Mussolini wrought?’ New Yorker, 2 May.Google Scholar
Storchi, S. 2013. “Mussolini as Monument: the Equestrian Statue of the Duce at the Littoriale Stadium in Bologna.” In The Cult of the Duce: Mussolini and the Italians, edited by Stephen Gundle, Christopher Duggan, and Giuliana Pieri, 193–208. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Tranfaglia, N. 1996. Un passato scomodo: Fascismo e postfascismo. Rome. Laterza.Google Scholar
Valenza, M. 2015. ‘Laura Boldrini: “Cancellate la scritta Dux.”’ Il Giornale, 17 April.Google Scholar
Ventresca, R. 2006. “Debating the Meaning of Fascism in Contemporary Italy.” Modern Italy 11 (2): 189–209.Google Scholar
Vidotto, V. 2004. “Il mito di Mussolini e le memorie nazionali: Le trasformazioni del Foro Italico 1937–1960.” In Roma: Architettura e città negli anni della seconda guerra mondiale, edited by A. Bruschi, 112–121. Rome: Gangemi.Google Scholar
Zevi, B. 1950. Storia dell’architettura moderna: dalle origini al 1950. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar