No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Neoconservatives and Neo-Confucians: East Asian Growth and the Celebration of Tradition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 September 2020
Abstract
This article explores the influence of East Asia's economic growth on the evolution of American neoconservative thought in the 1970s and 1980s. It traces how prominent neoconservative thinkers—Nathan Glazer, Peter L. Berger, Herman Kahn, Michael Novak, and Lawrence E. Harrison—developed the claim that the region's prosperity stemmed from its alleged Confucian tradition. Drawing in part from East Asian leaders and scholars, they argued that the region's growth demonstrated that tradition had facilitated, rather than hampered, the development of a distinct East Asian capitalist modernity. The article argues that this Confucian thesis helped American neoconservatives articulate their conviction that “natural” social hierarchies, religious commitment, and traditional families were necessary for healthy and free capitalist societies. It then charts how neoconservatives mobilized this interpretation of Confucian East Asia against postcolonial critiques of capitalism, especially dependency theory. East Asia, they claimed, demonstrated that poverty and wealth were determined not by patterns of welfare, structural exploitation, or foreign assistance, but values and culture. The concept of Confucian capitalism, the article shows, was central to neoconservatives’ broad ideological agenda of protecting political, economic, and racial inequality under the guise of values, culture, and tradition.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 Roderick MacFarquhar, “The Post-Confucian Challenge,” The Economist, 9 Feb. 1980, 67–72, at 68, 71.
2 Weber, Max, The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit of Capitalism” and Other Writings, trans. Baehr, Peter and Wells, Gordon C. (New York, 2002; first published 1905)Google Scholar; Weber, , The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism (Glencoe, IL, 1951; first published 1915)Google Scholar.
3 MacFarquhar, “The Post-Confucian Challenge,” 68. See also Pettuzzo, Sophie, “Confucianism and Capitalist Development: From Max Weber and Orientalism to Lee Kuan Yew and New Confucianism,” Asian Studies Review 43/2 (2019), 224–38, at 228Google Scholar; Barbalet, Jack, “Confucian Values and East Asian Capitalism: A Variable Weberian Trajectory,” in Turner, Bryan S. and Salamink, Oscar, eds., Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia (New York, 2015), 315–28, at 318–19Google Scholar.
4 See Gilman, Nils, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America (Baltimore, 2007)Google Scholar.
5 Vaïsse, Justin, Neoconservatism: The Biography of a Movement, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Cambridge, MA, 2010), 7Google Scholar. See also Dorrien, Gary J., The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideology (Philadelphia, 1993)Google Scholar; Friedman, Murray, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gerson, Mark, The Neoconservative Vision: From the Cold War to the Culture Wars (Lanham, 1996)Google Scholar, Hartmann, Andrew, A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars (Chicago, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Ehrman, John, The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs (New Haven, 1995)Google Scholar; Ahmad, Muhammad Idrees, The Road to Iraq: The Making of a Neoconservative War (Edinburgh, 2004)Google Scholar.
7 Burgin, Angus, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Great Depression (Cambridge, MA, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slobodian, Quinn, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge, MA, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 On the welfare state see Cooper, Melinda, Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism (New York, 2017), 49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 On American reactions to Japanese growth see McKevitt, Andrew C., Consuming Japan: Popular Culture and the Globalizing of 1980s America (Chapel Hill, 2017)Google Scholar.
10 Crozier, Michael J., Huntington, Samuel P., and Watanuki, Joji, The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission (New York, 1975), 113Google Scholar.
11 On culture-of-poverty discourse see Averbeck, Robin Marie, Liberalism Is Not Enough: Race and Poverty in Postwar Political Thought (Chapel Hill, 2018), 55–68, 86–97Google Scholar.
12 Rosemblatt, Karin Alejandra, “Other Americas: Transnationalism, Scholarship, and the Culture of Poverty in Mexico and the United States,” Hispanic American Historical Review 89/4 (2009), 603–41, at 638CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Chang, Gordon H., Fateful Ties: A History of America's Preoccupation with China (Cambridge, MA, 2015), 10, 23–4, 121–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Levenson, Joseph R., Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy, vol. 1, The Problem of Intellectual Continuity (Berkeley, 1968), xxxGoogle Scholar; Levenson, , Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy, vol. 2, The Problem of Monarchical Decay (Berkeley, 1968), viiGoogle Scholar.
15 Reischauer, Edwin O. and Fairbank, John K., East Asia: The Great Tradition (Boston, 1960), 70–72Google Scholar.
16 Levenson, The Problem of Monarchical Decay, vii. See also de Bary, William Theodore, Chan, Wing-tsit, and Watson, Burton, comps., Sources of Chinese Tradition (New York, 1960), 102–28Google Scholar.
17 Reischauer, Edwin O., “The Sinic World in Perspective,” Foreign Affairs 52/2 (1974), 341–8, at 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Levenson, Joseph R., Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy, vol. 3, The Problem of Historical Significance (Berkeley, 1968), 3Google Scholar.
19 Fairbank, John K., Reischauer, Edwin O. and Craig, Albert M., East Asia: The Modern Transformation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965), 5Google Scholar.
20 Ibid., 4. On modernization theory's influence in the historiography of China see Cohen, Paul A., China Unbound: Evolving Perspectives on the Chinese Past (London, 2003), 48–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a searing critique of modernization theory in Japan studies see Dower, John W., “E. H. Norman, Japan, and the Uses of History,” in Origins of the Modern Japanese State: Selected Writings of E. H. Norman, ed. Dower, John W. (New York, 1975), 3–102Google Scholar.
21 Wittfogel, Karl, Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power (New Haven, 1957), 151–2Google Scholar.
22 Quoted in Justin William Moyer, “How Lee Kuan Yew Made Singapore Strong: Family Values,” Washington Post, 23 March 2015, at www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/03/23/how-lee-kuan-yew-made-singapore-strong-family-values.
23 Beng-Huat, Chua, “‘Asian-Values’ Discourse and the Resurrection of the Social,” positions 7/2 (Fall 1999), 573–92, at 574–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harriet Zurndorfer, “Confusing Capitalism with Confucianism: Culture as Impediment and/or Stimulus to Chinese Economic Development,” at www.researchgate.net/publication/325270473_Confusing_Capitalism_with_Confucianism_Culture_as_Impediment_AndOr_Stimulus_to_Chinese_Economic_Development (May 2018), 1–20, at 3; Barbalet, “Confucian Values and East Asian Capitalism,” 324; Dirlik, Arif, “Confucius in the Borderlands: Global Capitalism and the Reinvention of Confucianism,” boundary 2 22/3 (1995), 229–73, at 230CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Kapur, Nick, “The Empire Strikes Back? The 1968 Meiji Centennial Celebrations and the Revival of Japanese Nationalism,” Japanese Studies 38/3 (2018), 305–28, at 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Befu, Harumi, Hegemony of Homogeneity: An Anthropological Analysis of Nihonjinron (Melbourne, 2001), 4Google Scholar.
25 Befu, Hegemony of Homogeneity, 16–43.
26 Nakane, Chie, Japanese Society (Berkeley, 1970), 5–6, 23, 148Google Scholar.
27 Shichihei, Yamamoto, The Spirit of Japanese Capitalism and Other Selected Essays, trans. Riggs, Lynne E. and Manabu, Takechi (Lanham, 1992), 112, 143Google Scholar. See also Morishima, Michio, Why Has Japan Succeeded? Western Technology and the Japanese Ethos (New York, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
28 Befu, Hegemony of Homogeneity, 81.
29 See, for example, Vogel's, Ezra F. best-selling Japan as Number One: Lessons for America (Cambridge, MA, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Wolf, Marvin J., The Japanese Conspiracy: The Plot to Dominate Industry Worldwide—and How to Deal with It (New York, 1983)Google Scholar.
30 Bellah, Robert N., Tokugawa Religion: The Cultural Roots of Modern Japan (New York, 1985), 183, 194, 196Google Scholar. See also Borovoy, Amy, “Robert Bellah's Search for Community and Ethical Modernity in Japan Studies,” Journal of Asian Studies 75/2 (2016), 467–94, at 470–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31 Dore, Ronald P., British Factory, Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations (Berkeley, 1973), 12, 295, 402Google Scholar.
32 Quoted in Dirlik, “Confucius in the Borderlands,” 255, 256. See also Metzger, Thomas A., Escape from Predicament: Neo-Confucianism and China's Evolving Political Culture (New York, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bary, William Theodore De, Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart (New York, 1981)Google Scholar.
33 Peter Skerry, “Nathan Glazer: Merit before Meritocracy,” American Spectator, 3 April 2019, at www.the-american-interest.com/2019/04/03/nathan-glazer-merit-before-meritocracy.
34 Averbeck, Liberalism Is Not Enough, 25.
35 Ibid., 27. Charles Petersen, “Meritocracy in America, 1932–1978,” 18 (I am grateful to Petersen for sharing this unpublished paper with me); Wu, Ellen D., The Color of Success: Asian Americans and the Origins of the Model Minority (Princeton, 2013), 243–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
36 Wu, The Color of Success, 155.
37 Wu, Ellen D., “The Invention of the Model Minority,” in Cheng, Cindy I-Fen, ed., Routledge Handbook of Asian American Studies (New York, 2017), 285–301, at 286Google Scholar. On the anti-black nature of model-minority discourse see Wu, The Color of Success, 145–241.
38 Glazer, Nathan, “Social and Cultural Factors in Japanese Economic Growth,” in Patrick, Hugh and Rosovsky, Henry, eds., Asia's New Giant: How the Japanese Economy Works (Washington, DC, 1976), 813–96, at 816, 820, 839, 842, 890Google Scholar.
39 Ibid., 818. 853, 861, 889–93. See also Doi, Takeo, The Anatomy of Dependence (Tokyo and New York, 1973)Google Scholar; and De Vos, George A., Socialization for Achievement: Essays on the Cultural Psychology of the Japanese (Berkeley, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
40 Neoconservative intellectuals and writers, including Daniel Bell, Raymond Aron, and William Kristol, were members of Hudson and/or its board of trustees. See Pickett, Neil, A History of the Hudson Institute (Indianapolis, 1992), 7Google Scholar; and Bruce-Briggs, B., Supergenius: The Mega Worlds of Herman Kahn (New York, 2000), 308Google Scholar.
41 Pickett, A History of the Hudson Institute, 8. See Kahn, Herman, The Emerging Japanese Superstate: Challenge and Response (Englewood Cliffs, 1970)Google Scholar; Kahn, Herman and Pepper, Thomas, The Japanese Challenge: The Successes and Failures of Economic Success (New York, 1979)Google Scholar.
42 These relationships continue today; in 2013 Japanese prime minister Abe Shinzō was the first non-American to receive Hudson's Herman Kahn Award. See Mitsuru Obe, “Abe First American to Win Conservative Hudson Institute Award,” Wall Street Journal, 23 Sept. 2013, at http://on.wsj.com/1b5SgF8.
43 Kase is quoted in Luttwak, Edward, “Friendly Relations,” London Review of Books 41/7 (2019)Google Scholar, at www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n07/edward-luttwak/friendly-relations.
44 Kahn, The Emerging Japanese Superstate, 8, 19, 20–21, 24, 38.
45 Benedict, Ruth, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1946)Google Scholar.
46 Kahn urged interested readers to obtain a copy of Lee's “excellent speech.” Kahn, Herman, World Economic Development: 1979 and Beyond (Boulder, 1979), 4Google Scholar.
47 Ibid., 122.
48 Ibid., 329, 2.
49 Ibid., xix–xx; and Bruce-Briggs, Supergenius, 358.
50 Dorrien, Gary J., The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideology (Philadelphia, 1993), 274–5Google Scholar.
51 Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind, 282. See also Berger, Peter L., Pyramids of Sacrifice: Political Ethics and Social Change (New York, 1974)Google Scholar.
52 Peter L. Berger, “Underdevelopment Revisited,” Commentary, 1 July 1984, 41–5, at 44.
53 Berger, Peter L., The Capitalist Revolution: Fifty Propositions about Prosperity, Liberty, and Equality (New York, 1986), 82–4, 12, 153Google Scholar.
54 Berger, Peter L., “An East Asian Development Model?” in Berger, Peter L. and Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael, eds., In Search of an East Asian Development Model (New Brunswick, 1988), 3–11, at 5–6Google Scholar.
55 Ibid., 6.
56 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 8.
57 Ibid., 163, 166.
58 Peter Berger, “Speaking to the Third World,” Commentary, 1 Oct. 1981, 29–36, at 35–6.
59 Examples include Chung-Hua Institute for Economic Research, Conference on Confucianism and Economic Development in East Asia, May 29–31, 1989 (Taipei, 1989); Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Cultural Identity and Modernization in Asian Countries: Proceedings of Kokugakuin University Centennial Symposium (Tokyo, 1983); Weiming, Tu, ed., The Triadic Chord: Confucian Ethics, Industrial East Asia, and Max Weber (Singapore, 1991)Google Scholar; Weiming, Tu, Hejtmanek, Milan, and Wachman, Alan, The Confucian World Observed: A Contemporary Discussion of Confucian Humanism in East Asia (Honolulu, 1992)Google Scholar.
60 Kristol, Irving, Two Cheers for Capitalism (New York, 1978), x, 65–6Google Scholar.
61 Ibid., ix, xi, 268, 262.
62 Bell, Daniel, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (New York, 1976), 28Google Scholar.
63 Ibid., 21–2, 55, 84.
64 Ibid., 14. Bell, Daniel, The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (New York, 1973)Google Scholar.
65 Rodgers, Daniel T., The Age of Fracture (Cambridge, MA, 2011), 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
66 Ibid., 83; Kristol, Two Cheers for Capitalism, 28.
67 Vaïsse, Neoconservatism, 78. See also Horwitz, Robert B., America's Right: Anti-establishment Conservatism from Goldwater to the Tea Party (Cambridge, 2013), 116–24Google Scholar.
68 Kristol, Two Cheers for Capitalism, 28–30.
69 Eich, Stefan, “Daniel Bell's Dilemma: Financialization, Family Values, and Their Discontents,” Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics 1/1 (2019), 241–58, at 252CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bell, The Cultural Contradiction of Capitalism, 29–30.
70 Kahn, World Economic Development, 170, 31–2.
71 Borovoy, “Robert Bellah's Search,” 470, 477. See also Bellah, Robert B., “Civil Religion in America,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 96/1 (1967), 1–21Google Scholar.
72 Glazer, “Social and Cultural Factors in Japanese Economic Growth,” 896, 891, 894.
73 Kahn, World Economic Development, 161, 165–6, 170; Bruce-Briggs, Supergenius, 350–51.
74 Kahn, World Economic Development, 177, 339.
75 Ibid., 121.
76 Ibid., 121–2. For a more extreme take on “Confucian monogamy” see William Tucker, “All in the Family,” National Review, 6 March 1995, 36–44, 76, at 37.
77 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 71–85.
78 Ibid., 112–13.
79 Cooper, Family Values, 287. The concept of mediating structures played a central role in neoconservative visions of welfare reform. See Berger, Peter L. and Neuhaus, Richard John, To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy (Washington, DC, 1977)Google Scholar.
80 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 71–108; Berger, “Speaking to the Third World,” 36.
81 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 169.
82 Novak, Michael, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism (New York, 1982), 56, 134Google Scholar.
83 Kahn, World Economic Development, 121.
84 Ibid., 122.
85 Ibid., 122.
86 Ibid., 120.
87 Johnson, Chalmers, Japan: Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State (New York, 1995), 8, 38–41Google Scholar; Johnson, , MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975 (Stanford, 1982), viiiGoogle Scholar.
88 See, for example, Robert B. Reich, “Why the United States Needs an Industrial Policy,” Harvard Business Review, Jan. 1982, at https://hbr.org/1982/01/why-the-us-needs-an-industrial-policy; Reich, “An Industrial Policy of the Right,” Public Interest, Fall 1983, 3–17.
89 Theodore H. White, “The Danger from Japan,” New York Times Magazine, 28 July 1985, at www.nytimes.com/1985/07/28/magazine/the-danger-from-japan.html?pagewanted=all; Jennifer M. Miller, “Adam Smith's Arthritis: Japan and Fears of American Decline,” in Jonathan Hunt and Simon Miles, eds., Reagan's World: The Cold War and Beyond (Ithaca, forthcoming).
90 Irving Kristol, “On Corporate Capitalism in America,” Public Interest, Fall 1975, 124–41, at 137.
91 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 166.
92 Adelman, Jeremy, “International Finance and Political Legitimacy: A Latin American View of the Global Shock,” in Ferguson, Niall, Maier, Charles S., Manela, Erez, and Sargent, Daniel J., eds., The Shock of the Global: The 1970s in Perspective (Cambridge, MA, 2011), 113–27, at 119, 124Google Scholar.
93 Adelman, “International Finance and Political Legitimacy,” 125.
94 Franczak, Michael, “Losing the Battle, Winning the War: Neoconservatives versus the New International Economic Order, 1974–1982,” Diplomatic History 43/5 (2019), 867–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
95 Moyn, Samuel, Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World (Cambridge, MA, 2018), 89–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ogle, Vanessa, “State Rights against Private Capital: The ‘New International Economic Order’ and the Struggle over Aid, Trade, and Foreign Investment, 1962–1980,” Humanity 5/2 (2014), 211–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
96 Quoted in Franczak, “Losing the Battle, Winning the War,” 2.
97 Quoted in ibid., 6.
98 Berger, “Speaking to the Third World,” 33.
99 Whyte, Jessica, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism (New York, 2019), 119Google Scholar.
100 P. T. Bauer, “Western Guilt and Third World Poverty,” Commentary, 1 Jan. 1976, 31–8, at 32.
101 P. T. Bauer and B. S. Yamey, “Against the New Economic Order,” Commentary, 1 April 1977, 25–31, at 28.
102 Ibid., 28–9.
103 Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 32.
104 Berger, “Speaking to the Third World,” 31.
105 Ibid., 33.
106 Ibid., 33.
107 Ibid., 34.
108 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 128–9.
109 Ibid., 129.
110 Berger, “Underdevelopment Revisited,” 45.
111 Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 128.
112 Berger, Peter L. and Novak, Michael, Speaking to the Third World: Essays on Democracy and Development (Washington, DC, 1985)Google Scholar.
113 Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 185.
114 Novak, Michael, This Hemisphere of Liberty: A Philosophy for the Americas (Washington, DC, 1990), 57Google Scholar.
115 Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 299.
116 Novak, This Hemisphere of Liberty, 57.
117 Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 289, 285.
118 Michael Novak, “A Malthusian Vision,” Forbes, 14 May 1990, 80.
119 Novak, This Hemisphere of Liberty, 57; Novak, “A Malthusian Vision,” 80.
120 Harrison, Lawrence E., Underdevelopment Is a State of Mind: The Latin American Case (Cambridge, MA, 1985), xviGoogle Scholar.
121 Harrison, Lawrence E., Who Prospers? How Cultural Values Shape Economic and Political Success (New York, 1992), 115, 142Google Scholar; Harrison, Underdevelopment Is a State of Mind, 165.
122 Jared Taylor, Shadows of the Rising Sun: A Critical View of the “Japanese Miracle” (New York, 1983). On Taylor, who was born in Japan to missionary parents, see www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/jared-taylor.
123 Sowell, Thomas, Ethnic America: A History (New York, 1981), 6Google Scholar. On the widespread nature of such discourses in the 1970s and 1980s see Wu, The Color of Success, 248–52.
124 Harrison, Underdevelopment Is a State of Mind, 165–7; Harrison, Who Prospers?, 192. Novak utilized Sowell's work to make similar points. See Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 161, 219–20.
125 Harrison, Who Prospers?, 149.
126 Ibid., 149, 153–5, 187, 214.
127 “American Survey: The Million Who Are There, but Have Not Quite Arrived,” The Economist, 25 Jan. 1986, 31.
128 Peter Brimelow, “Time to Rethink Immigration?” National Review, 22 June 1992, 30–46, at 45.
129 Peter Brimelow, “Mysteries of the Orient,” National Review, 18 Aug. 1989, 43–4, at 44.
130 Brimelow, “Time to Rethink Immigration?”, 36, 39.
131 Pettuzzo, “Confucianism and Capitalist Development,” 224–5, 229–35.
132 Chua, “Asian-Values’ Discourse and the Resurrection of the Social,” 575–7; and Jenco, Leigh, “Revisiting Asian Values,” Journal of the History of Ideas 74/2 (2013), 237–58, at 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
133 Nathan Glazer, “Two Cheers for ‘Asian Values’,” National Interest, Fall 1999, 27–34, at 27.
134 Huntington, Samuel P., “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs 71/3 (1993), 22–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Huntington, , The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman, 1991), 72–6, 299–307Google Scholar; Harrison, Lawrence E. and Huntington, Samuel, eds., Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress (New York, 2001)Google Scholar.
135 Huntington, Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York, 1996), 234Google Scholar.
136 Ibid., 20, 29.
137 Cooper, Family Values, 313.
138 Kahn, World Economic Development, 329; Berger, The Capitalist Revolution, 149–53.