Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:25:48.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An applied mineralogical investigation of concrete degradation in a major concrete road bridge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

G. Macleod ,
A. J. Hall  and
A. E. Fallick
G. Macleod
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
A. J. Hall
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
A. E. Fallick
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A core of concrete taken from a major road bridge in the Strathclyde Region, Scotland, has been subjected to an applied mineralogical investigation, which involved stable isotope analysis, petrography, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy.

The structure is actively undergoing severe degradation due to mineral growth which is related to chemical reactions between the concrete and pore fluid. The physical growth of minerals causes disfigurement and structural weakening.

Pyrite and pyrrhotine hosted by dolerite aggregate appear to have been oxidized, providing sulphate for the deposition of ettringite and minor gypsum, in spheroidal cavities within the cement paste. The rainwater which passes through the structure mobilising sulphate from original gypsum in the paste and oxidizing the iron sulphides is also involved in the further leaching of elements from the cement paste and in the deposition of calcite. The isotopic values of calcites forming a crust on the concrete and a stalactite under the bridge are similar with δ13C= −19‰ PDB and δ18‰= +16‰ SMOW. We suggest that atmospheric carbon dioxide was the carbon source. The carbon isotopic fractionation of −12‰ from atmospheric carbon dioxide of δ13C= −7‰, (O'Neil and Barnes, 1971) can best be explained as due to a kinetic fractionation related to the hyper-basicity of the pore water. The equilibrium formation temperature of about 45°C calculated from the oxygen isotope values and assuming a δ18O value of meteoric water of −8‰ SMOW, is considered unreasonable. The exceptionally low δ18O values are attributed mainly to reaction kinetics and the calcite inheriting its oxygen, two-thirds from atmospheric carbon dioxide and one third from the meteoric formation water (O'Neil and Barnes, 1971). A δ18O value of atmospheric carbon dioxide of +41‰ SMOW and a δ18O value of meteoric water of −8‰ SMOW, lead to a calculated δ18O value for the calcites of +10‰ SMOW. The calcites analysed have a value of +16‰ and this may be due to partial re-equilibration towards a calculated value of +21‰ for calcite in equilibrium with the meteoric water at 20°C.

Keywords

concrete deteriorationpetrographyettringitecalcitestable isotopes
Type
Applied Mineralogy
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 54 , Issue 377 , December 1990 , pp. 637 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASTM (1988) Recommended Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete. ASTM Standard Practice Report C 856-88, ASTM Philadelphia USA.Google Scholar
Charola, A. E. and Lewin, S. Z. (1979) Scanning Electron Microscopy, 1, 379-86.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. (1976) Cement paste microstructure—an overview at several levels. Proc. Conf. Hydraulic Cement Pastes, Their Structures and Properties, University of Sheffield, 2-30.Google Scholar
Glasser, F. P. (1986) Fortsch. Mineral. 64, 19-35.Google Scholar
Komarneni, S. and Guggenheim, S. (1988) Mineral. Mag. 52, 371-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, F. M. (1970) The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
McCrea, J. M. (1950) J. Chem. Phys. 18, 849-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlino, S. (1988a) Mineral. Mag. 52, 247-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlino, S. (1988b) Ibid. 52, 377-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minoru, H. (1968) Neutralisation of concrete and corrosion of reinforcing steel. Proc. 5th Int. Syrup., The Chemistry of Concrete, Part 3, Tokyo, The Cement Association of Japan.Google Scholar
Neville, A. M. and Brooks, J. J. (1987) Concrete Technology. Longman Scientific and Technical U.K. Google Scholar
O'Neil, J. R. and Barnes, I. (1971) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 35, 687-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourbaix, M. (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Powers, T. C. and Hammersley, G. P. (1978) Concrete, 12 (8), 27–31.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Feldman, R. F. and Beaudoin, J.J. (1981) Concrete Science. Heyden.Google Scholar
Smith, B., Whalley, B., and Fassina, F. (1988) New Scientist, 2nd June, 49-53.Google Scholar
Shayan, A. (1988) Cement and Concrete Research, 18, 723-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar