Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:07:27.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retention of Calcium and Other Ions for Microanalysis by Freeze-Drying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Keith P. Ryan  and
Lorraine S. Berry
Keith P. Ryan
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association of the UK, Devon, UK Department of Biology, University of Plymouth, Devon, UK
Lorraine S. Berry
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association of the UK, Devon, UK

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Calcium (Ca++) and other diffusible ions cannot be preserved for x-ray microanalysis if specimens have been preserved by fixation using formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde or other fixatives. Atoms, such as Ca, are not diffusible when they are bound to something insoluble, such as bone or hard granules in cells which are sometimes mechanisms for detoxifying. Ions, loosely bound elements and other components such as sugars and amino acids are leached out during chemical fixation and dehydration by solvents. This problem was recognized over a hundred years ago by Richard Altmann. An alternative to wet chemical processing is the purely physical method that involves rapidly freezing the specimen and then removing the frozen water by the process of freeze drying, which is the subject of this article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy Today , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , April 2000 , pp. 14 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2000

References

(1) Nott J.A. (1998). Metals and marine food chains, In; Metals in aquatic environments (eds. W.J. Langston & M.J, Bebbiano) Chapman & Hall, London, 387-414.

(2) Coetzee J. & Merwe F van der (1984). J. Microsc. 135, 147-158.

(3) Morgan, A.J. (1980). In: X-ray Microanalysis in Biology (ed. M.A, Hyat) pp. 65–166. MacMillan, London and Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(4) Altmann, R. (1890). Die Elementarorganismem und ihre Beziehungen zu den Zelien. Veit, Leipzig.Google Scholar

(5) Echlin, P. (1988). Low Temperature Microscopy and Analysis. Plenum- Press, New York and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(6) A.W., Robards & U.V., Sleytr (1985). Low temperature methods in biological electron microscopy, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar

(7) A., Steinbrecht & K., Zierold (1987). Cryotechniques in biological electron microscopy (eds. Steinbrecht, A. and Zierold, K.). Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

(8) Michel, M., Hillmann, T. & Müller, M. (1991). Cryosectioning of plant material frozen at high pressure. J. Microsc. 163, 3-18.Google Scholar

(9) Sartori, Blanc N., Studer, D., Ruhl, K. & Dubochet, J. (1998). Electron beam-induced changes in vitreous sections of biological samples. J. Microsc. 192, 194-201.Google Scholar

(10) Heuser, J.E. & Reese, T.S. (1981). Structural changes after transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction, J. Cell Biol. 88, 564-580.Google Scholar

(11) Ryan, K.P. (1992). Cryofixation of tissues for electron microscopy: a review of plunge cooling methods. Scanning Microsc. 6, 715-743.Google Scholar

(12) MacKenzie, A.P. (1981). Modelling the ultrarapid freezing of cells and tissues. In: Microprobe analysis of biological specimens (eds. Hutchinson, T.E. & Somlyo, A.P.). Academic Press, New York, 397-421.Google Scholar