Article contents
The NCEM One-Angstrom Microscope Project Reaches 0.89Å Resolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2020
Extract
Transmission electron microscopy to a resolution of 0.89Å has been achieved at the National Center for Electron Microscopy and is available to electron microscopists who have a requirement for this level of resolution. Development of this capability commenced in 1993, when the National Center for Electron Microscopy agreed to fund a proposal for a unique facility, a one- Ångstrom microscope (OÅM).2 The OÅM project provides materials scientists with transmission electron microscopy at a resolution better than one Angstrom by exploiting the significantly higher information limit of a FEG-TEM over its Scherzer resolution limit. To turn the misphased information beyond the Scherzer limit into useful resolution, the OÅM requires extensive image reconstruction. One method chosen was reconstruction from off-axis holograms; another was reconstruction from focal series of underfocused images. The OÅM is then properly a combination of a FEG-TEM (a CM300FEG-UT) together with computer software able to generate sub-Ångstrom images from experimental images obtained on the FEG-TEM.
Before the advent of the OÅM, NCEM microscopists relied on image simulation to obtain structural information beyond the TEM resolution limit.
- Type
- Microscopy Milestones of the Last Millenium
- Information
- Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 6 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2000, Microscopy Society of America 58th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 34th Annual Meeting, Microscopical Society of Canada/Societe de Microscopie de Canada 27th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 13-17, 2000 , August 2000 , pp. 1192 - 1193
- Copyright
- Copyright © Microscopy Society of America
References
1. For information on becoming an NCEM user, see <http://ncem.lbl.gov/frames/user.htm>>Google Scholar
2. O'Keefe, M.A., LBL Symposium on Microstructures of Materials, ed. Krishnan, K. (1993) 121-126.Google Scholar
3. O'Keefe, M.A.,.Buseck, P.R. and Iijima, S., Nature 274 (1978) 322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. O'Keefe, Michael A. & Kilaas, Roar, in Proc. 6th Pfefferkorn Conf. on Image and Signal Processing, Niagara Falls, Ontario (1987). Publ. as Scanning Microsc. suppl. 2 (1988) 225–244.Google Scholar
5. Epicier, T., O'Keefe, M.A. and Thomas, G., (1990) Acta Cryst. A 46, 948–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. O'Keefe, M.A., R&D Magazine (1999) <http://www.rdmag.eom/basics/l Omicroscopy.htm>' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=O'Keefe,+M.A.,+R&D+Magazine+(1999)+
7. Wenk, H.-R., Downing, K.H., Meisheng, Hu, and O'Keefe, M.A., Acta Cryst. A 48 (1992) 700–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. O'Keefe, M.A., Ultramicroscopy 47 (1992) 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. O'Keefe, Michael A., in 55th Ann. Proc. MSA, Cleveland, Ohio (1997) 1165–1166.Google Scholar
10. O'Keefe, M.A., these proceedings.Google Scholar
11. Turner, John H., O'Keefe, Michael A. & Mueller, Robert, 55th Ann. Proc. MSA, Cleveland, Ohio (1997) 1177–1178.Google Scholar
12. Wang, Y.C., O'Keefe, Michael A., Pan, Ming, Nelson, E.C., and Kisielowski, C. in Proc. XlVth Int. Congress for Electron Microscopy 1 (1998) 573–574.Google Scholar
13. Bleeker, Arno J., Overwijk, Mark H.F. and Otten, Max T., 54th Ann. Proc. MSA, Minneapolis, MN (1997) 418–419.Google Scholar
14. Wang, Y.C., Fitzgerald, A., Nelson, E.C., Song, C., O'Keefe, M.A. & Kisielowski, C., 57th Ann. Proc. MSA, Portland, Oregon (1999) 822–823.Google Scholar
15. O'Keefe, M.A., in 37th Ann. Proc. EMSA, San Antonio, Texas (1979) 556–557.Google Scholar
16. Coene, W.M.J., Thust, A., Beeck, M. Opde and Dyck, D. Van, Ultramicroscopy 64 (1996) 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Work supported by Director, Office of Science - through the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Material Sciences Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by