Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T08:10:45.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multi-Angle Plasma Focused Ion Beam (FIB) Curtaining Artifact Correction Using a Fourier-Based Linear Optimization Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2018

Christopher W. Schankula
Affiliation:
Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
Christopher K. Anand
Affiliation:
Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
Nabil D. Bassim*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
*
*Author for correspondence: Nabil D. Bassim, E-mail: bassimn@mcmaster.ca
Get access

Abstract

We present a flexible linear optimization model for correcting multi-angle curtaining effects in plasma focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (PFIB-SEM) images produced by rocking-polishing schemes. When PFIB-SEM is employed in a serial sectioning tomography workow, it is capable of imaging large three-dimensional volumes quickly, providing rich information in the critical 10–100 nm feature length scale. During tomogram acquisition, a “rocking polish” is often used to reduce straight-line “curtaining” gradations in the milled sample surface. While this mitigation scheme is effective for deep curtains, it leaves shallower line artifacts at two discretized angles. Segmentation and other automated processing of the image set requires that these artifacts be corrected for accurate microstructural quantification. Our work details a new Fourier-based linear optimization model for correcting curtaining artifacts by targeting curtains at two discrete angles. We demonstrate its capabilities by processing images from a tomogram from a multiphase, heterogeneous concrete sample. We present methods for selecting the parameters which meet the user’s goals most appropriately. Compared to previous works, we show that our model provides effective multi-angle curtain correction without introducing artifacts into the image, modifying non-curtain structures or causing changes to the contrast of voids. Our algorithm can be easily parallelized to take advantage of multi-core hardware.

Type
Software and Instrumentation
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Schankula CW, Anand CK and Bassim ND (2018) Multi-Angle Plasma Focused Ion Beam (FIB) Curtaining Artifact Correction Using a Fourier-Based Linear Optimization Model. Microsc Microanal. 24(6), 657–666. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618015234

References

Abràmoff, MD, Magalhães, PJ Ram, SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 11, 3642.Google Scholar
Adams, D, Mayer, T, Vasile, M Archuleta, K (2006) Effects of evolving surface morphology on yield during focused ion beam milling of carbon. Appl Surf Sci 252, 24322444.Google Scholar
Bertsimas, D Tsitsiklis, JN (1997) Introduction to Linear Optimization , vol. 6. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.Google Scholar
Bouali, M Ladjal, S (2011) Toward optimal destriping of MODIS data using a unidirectional variational model. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49, 29242935.Google Scholar
Burnett, T, Kelley, R, Winiarski, B, Contreras, L, Daly, M, Gholinia, A, Burke, M Withers, P (2016) Large volume serial section tomography by Xe Plasma FIB dual beam microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 161, 119129.Google Scholar
Cairney, J Munroe, P (2003) Redeposition effects in transmission electron microscope specimens of feal--wc composites prepared using a focused ion beam. Micron 34, 97107.Google Scholar
Cantoni, M Holzer, L (2014) Advances in 3D focused ion beam tomography. MRS Bull 39, 354360.Google Scholar
Chalmers, GR, Bustin, RM Power, IM (2012) Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the barnett, woodford, haynesville, marcellus, and doig units. AAPG Bull 96, 10991119.Google Scholar
Chang, Y, Fang, H, Yan, L Liu, H (2013) Robust destriping method with unidirectional total variation and framelet regularization. Opt Express 21, 2330723323.Google Scholar
Chen, J, Lin, H, Shao, Y Yang, L (2006) Oblique striping removal in remote sensing imagery based on wavelet transform. Int J Remote Sens 27, 17171723.Google Scholar
Curtis, ME, Ambrose, RJ Sondergeld, CH (2010) Structural characterization of gas shales on the micro-and nano-scales. Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, October 19–21, Society of Petroleum Engineers.Google Scholar
Curtis, ME, Sondergeld, CH, Ambrose, RJ Rai, CS (2012) Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging. AAPG Bull 96, 665677.Google Scholar
Fitschen, JH, Ma, J Schuff, S (2017) Removal of curtaining effects by a variational model with directional forward differences. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 155, 2432.Google Scholar
Goral, J, Miskovic, I, Gelb, J Andrew, M (2015) Correlative XRM and FIB-SEM for (non) organic pore network modeling in woodford shale rock matrix. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, December 6–9.Google Scholar
Graybeal, B (2009) UHPC making strides. Public Roads 72, 1721.Google Scholar
Graybeal, B (2011) Ultra-high performance concrete, Technical Report. Available at US Department of Transportation, Publication FHWA-HRT-11-038, pdf: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/11038/11038.pdf Google Scholar
Hansen, PC O’Leary, DP (1993) The use of the l-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 14, 14871503.Google Scholar
Ishitani, T, Umemura, K, Ohnishi, T, Yaguchi, T Kamino, T (2004) Improvements in performance of focused ion beam cross-sectioning: aspects of ion-sample interaction. J Electron Microsc 53, 443449.Google Scholar
Kotula, PG, Rohrer, GS Marsh, MP (2014) Focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopy for 3d materials characterization. MRS Bull 39, 361365.Google Scholar
Liu, JG Morgan, GLK (2006) FFT selective and adaptive filtering for removal of systematic noise in ETM+ imageodesy images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 44, 37163724.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, King, HE, van Huis, MA, Drury, MR Plümper, O (2016) Nano-tomography of porous geological materials using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy. Minerals 6, 104.Google Scholar
Makhorin, A (2006) GNU linear programming kit, version 4.9. GNU Software Foundation.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S, OSullivan, M Dunning, I (2011) PuLP: a linear programming toolkit for python, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Available at http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2011/09/3178pdf (retrieved January 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Münch, B, Trtik, P, Marone, F Stampanoni, M (2009) Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet—Fourier filtering. Opt Express 17, 85678591.Google Scholar
Otsu, N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9, 6266.Google Scholar
Rubanov, S Munroe, P (2003) The effect of the gold sputter-coated films in minimising damage in FIB-produced TEM specimens. Mater Lett 57, 22382241.Google Scholar
Rubanov, S Munroe, P (2004) The application of FIB milling for specimen preparation from crystalline germanium. Micron 35, 549556.Google Scholar
Shu-wen, WC Pellequer, JL (2011) DeStripe: frequency-based algorithm for removing stripe noises from AFM images. BMC Struct Biol 11, 7.Google Scholar
Thévenaz, P (1998) StackReg: an ImageJ plugin for the recursive alignment of a stack of images, Biomedical Imaging Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Utke, I, Moshkalev, S Russell, P (2012) Nanofabrication Using Focused Ion and Electron Beams: Principles and Applications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Walt, S, Schönberger, JL, Nunez-Iglesias, J, Boulogne, F, Warner, JD, Yager, N, Gouillart, E Yu, T (2014) scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453.Google Scholar
Walt, SVD., Colbert, SC Varoquaux, G (2011) The numpy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Computing in Science & Engineering 13, 2230.Google Scholar
Wirth, R (2009) Focused Ion Beam (FIB) combined with SEM and TEM: Advanced analytical tools for studies of chemical composition, microstructure and crystal structure in geomaterials on a nanometre scale. Chem Geol 261, 217229.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Schankula et al. supplementary material

Schankula et al. supplementary material 1

Download Schankula et al. supplementary material(File)
File 454 Bytes
Supplementary material: File

Schankula et al. supplementary material

Schankula et al. supplementary material 2

Download Schankula et al. supplementary material(File)
File 7.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Schankula et al. supplementary material

Schankula et al. supplementary material 3

Download Schankula et al. supplementary material(File)
File 45 KB