Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:04:38.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extending Energy-Filtered Transmission Electron Microscopy (EFTEM) into Three Dimensions Using Electron Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2003

Matthew Weyland  and
Paul A. Midgley
Matthew Weyland
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
Paul A. Midgley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
Get access

Abstract

The length scales on which materials microstructures are being formed, grown, and even designed are becoming increasingly small and increasingly three-dimensional. For such complex structures two-dimensional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis is often inadequate and occasionally misleading. One approach to this problem is the modification of electron tomography techniques, developed for structural biology, for use in materials science. Energy-Filtered (EF) TEM elemental distribution images approximate to true projections of structure, and, as such, can be used to reconstruct the three-dimensional distribution of chemical species. A sample holder has been modified to allow the high tilt (±60°) required for tomography and a semiautomatic acquisition script designed to manage energy-loss acquisition. Tilt series data sets have been acquired from two widely different experimental systems, Cr carbides in 316 stainless steel and magnetite nanocrystals in magnetotactic bacteria, demonstrating single- and multiple-element tomography. It is shown that both elemental maps and jump-ratio images are suitable for reconstruction, despite the effects of diffraction contrast in the former and thickness changes in the latter. It is concluded that the image contrast, signal, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are key to the achievable reconstruction quality and, as such, the technique may be of limited value for high energy loss/small inelastic cross section edges.

Keywords

electron tomographyEFTEMelectron microscopythree-dimensionalreconstructionstainless steelmagnetotactic bacteria
Type
Microscopy Techniques
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 9 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 542 - 555
Copyright
© 2003 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, D.J. & Scott, E.R.D. (2002). Origin of supposedly biogenic magnetite in the martian meteorite Allan Hills 84001. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 6556–6561.Google Scholar
Buseck, P.R., Dunin-Borkowski, R.E., Devouard, B., Frankel, R.B., McCartney, M.R., Midgley, P.A., Posfai, M., & Weyland, M. (2001). Magnetite morphology and life on Mars. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 13490–13495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, R.A., de Rosier, D.J., & Klug, A. (1970). The reconstruction of a three-dimensional structure from projections and its application to electron microscopy. Proc Royal Soc London A 317, 319–340.Google Scholar
Crowther, R.A. & Klug, A. (1971). ART and science or conditions for three-dimensional reconstruction from electron microscope images. J Theoret Biol 32, 199–203.Google Scholar
Dierksen, K., Typke, D., Hegerl, R., Koster, A.J., & Baumeister, W. (1992). Towards automatic electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 40, 71–87.Google Scholar
Frank, J. & McEwen, B.F. (1992). Alignment by cross-correlation. In Electron Tomography: Three-Dimensional Imaging with the Transmission Electron Microscope, Frank, J. (Ed.). New York, London: Plenum Press.
Gilbert, P. (1972). Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. J Theoret Biol 36, 105–117.Google Scholar
Golden, D.C., Ming, D.W., Schwandt, C.S., Lauer, H.V., Socki, R.A., Morris, R.V., Lofgren, G.E., & McKay, G.A. (2001). A simple inorganic process for formation of carbonates, magnetite, and sulfides in Martian meteroite ALH84001. Am Mineralog 86, 370–375; Erratum, 86, 956.Google Scholar
Gordon, R., Bender, R., & Herman, G.T. (1970). Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography. J Theoret Biol 29, 471–481.Google Scholar
Grimm, R., Typke, D., & Baumeister, W. (1998). Improving image quality by zero-loss energy filtering: Quantitative assessment by means of image cross-correlation. J Microsc 190, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, P.W. (1992). The electron microscope as a structure projector. In Electron Tomography: Three-Dimensional Imaging with the Transmission Electron Microscope, Frank, J. (Ed.), pp. 17–38. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Keast, V.J., Midgley, P.A., Lloyd, S.J., Thomas, P.J., Weyland, M., Boothroyd, C.B., & Humphreys, C.J. (1999). Composition of grain boundaries and interfaces: A comparison of modern analytical techniques using a 300 kV FEGTEM. Inst Phys Conf Ser 161, 35–38.Google Scholar
Koster, A.J. & de Ruijter, W.J. (1992). Practical autoalignment of transmission electron microscopes. Ultramicroscopy 40, 89–107.Google Scholar
Koster, A.J., Grimm, R., Typke, D., Hegerl, R., Stoschek, A., Walz, J., & Baumeister, W. (1997). Perspectives of molecular and cellular electron tomography. J Struct Biol 120, 276–308.Google Scholar
Koster, A.J., Ziese, U., Verkleij, A.J., Janssen, A.H., & de Jong, K.P. (2000). Three-dimensional electron microscopy: A novel imaging and characterization technique with nanometer scale resolution for materials science. J Phys Chem B 104, 9368–9370.Google Scholar
Krivanek, O.L., Gubbens, A.J., Kundmann, M.K., & Carpenter, G.C. (1993). Elemental mapping with an energy-selecting imaging filter. In Proc. 51st Annual Meeting of the Microscopy Society of America, pp. 586–587. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Press Inc.
Krivanek, O.L., Kundmann, M.K., & Kimto, K. (1995). Spatial resolution in EFTEM elemental maps. J Microsc 180, 277–287.Google Scholar
Lawrence, M.C. (1992). Least-squares method of alignment using markers. In Electron Tomography: Three-Dimensional Imaging with the Transmission Electron Microscope, Frank, J. (Ed.), pp. 197–204. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Leith, A. (1992). Computer visualization of volume data in electron tomography. Electron Tomography: Three-Dimensional Imaging with the Transmission Electron Microscope, Frank, J. (Ed.), pp. 215–236. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Mayer, J. (1992). Electron spectroscopic imaging and diffraction: Applications in materials science. In 50th Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, Bailey, G. W., Bently, J. & Small, J. A. (Eds.), pp. 1198–1199. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Press Inc.
Midgley, P.A., Weyland, M., Thomas, J.M., & Johnson, B.F.G. (2001). Z-contrast tomography: A technique in three-dimensional nanostructural analysis based on Rutherford scattering. Chem Commun, 907–908.Google Scholar
Mobus, G. & Inkson, B.J. (2001). Three-dimensional reconstruction of buried nanoparticles by element-sensitive tomography based on inelastically scattered electrons. Appl Phys Lett 79, 1369–1371.Google Scholar
Radermacher, M. (1988). 3-dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series. J Electron Microsc Tech 9, 359–394.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.J. & Midgley, P.A. (2001a). Image-spectroscopy—I. The advantages of increased spectral information for compositional EFTEM analysis. Ultramicroscopy 88, 179–186.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.J. & Midgley, P.A. (2001b). Image-spectroscopy—II. The removal of plural scattering from extended energy-filtered series by Fourier deconvolution. Ultramicroscopy 88, 187–194.Google Scholar
Thomas-Kerpta, K.L., Bazylinski, D.A., Kirschvink, J.L., Clemett, S.J., McKay, D.S., Wentworth, S.J., Vali, H., Gibson, E.K., & Romanek, C.S. (2000). Elongated prismatic magnetite crystals in ALH84001 carbonate globules: Potential Martian magnetofossils. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64, 4049–4081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, M. & Midgley, P.A. (2001). 3D-EFTEM: Tomographic reconstruction from tilt series of energy loss images. Inst Phys Conf Ser 161, 239–242.Google Scholar
Weyland, M., Midgley, P.A., & Thomas, J.M. (2001). Electron tomography of nanoparticle catalysts on porous supports: A new technique based on Rutherford scattering. J Phys Chem B 105, 7882–7886.Google Scholar
Ziese, U., Janssen, R., Geerts, W., van der Krift, T., van Balen, A., de Ruijter, H., de Jong, K., Verkleij, A., & Koster, B. (2001). A novel method of data collection for automated electron tomography based upon pre-calibration of image shifts and defocus changes. Microsc Microanal, 7(suppl 2), 78–79.Google Scholar