Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:26:11.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Gasohol on The Rat Liver

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

B.A. MacDuff
Affiliation:
Atlantic Veterinary College, Charlottetown, PE, CanadaClA 4P3
A. Singh
Affiliation:
Atlantic Veterinary College, Charlottetown, PE, CanadaClA 4P3
I. Chu
Affiliation:
Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, Tunney ' s Pasture, Ottawa, ON, CanadaKlA 0L2
Get access

Extract

Although there are a variety of gasoline ethanol mixtures proposed as neat fuels (ethanol 85% + gasoline 15% = E85; E95) for automobiles, gasohol (gasoline 90% + ethanol 10%) is presently used as a fuel in the United States. The adverse effects, if any, of gasohol ingestion are unknown; effects on the liver of rats administered gasohol are examined in this study.

Twenty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats received daily, via gavage, one of the three concentrations of gasohol for 28 days; LD50/20, LD50/100 and LD50/1000, where LD50 = 1.5g ethanol / kg body weight (bw) and 14g gasoline / kg bw. The LD50 was based on that of gasoline, which was obtained from literature value.1 The amount of ethanol added to stock gasohol was only 1/10 its LD50, required to maintain the gasoline ethanol proportion of 9:1. Gasohol was administered in corn oil with total volume 10 ml. Animals that received only corn oil served as controls.

Type
Pathology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Weaver, N.K., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 534(1988)441.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb30133.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Swenberg, J.A.et al., Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 97(1989)35.10.1016/0041-008X(89)90053-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Haywood, S., Br. J. Nutr. 45(1981)295.10.1079/BJN19810106CrossRefGoogle Scholar