Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:50:39.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlative Light-Electron Fractography of Interlaminar Fracture in a Carbon–Epoxy Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Luis Rogerio de O. Hein  and
Kamila A. de Campos
Luis Rogerio de O. Hein*
Affiliation:
Materials Imaging Lab, Department of Materials and Technology, Faculty of Engineering at Guaratinguetá, UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá, SP 12516-410, Brazil
Kamila A. de Campos
Affiliation:
Materials Imaging Lab, Department of Materials and Technology, Faculty of Engineering at Guaratinguetá, UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá, SP 12516-410, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. rhein@feg.unesp.br
Get access

Abstract

This work evaluates the use of light microscopes (LMs) as a tool for interlaminar fracture of polymer composite investigation with the aid of correlative fractography. Correlative fractography consists of an association of the extended depth of focus (EDF) method, based on reflected LM, with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate interlaminar fractures. The use of these combined techniques is exemplified here for the mode I fracture of carbon–epoxy plain-weave reinforced composite. The EDF-LM is a digital image-processing method that consists of the extraction of in-focus pixels for each x-y coordinate in an image from a stack of Z-ordered digital pictures from an LM, resulting in a fully focused picture and a height elevation map for each stack. SEM is the most used tool for the identification of fracture mechanisms in a qualitative approach, with the combined advantages of a large focus depth and fine lateral resolution. However, LMs, with EDF software, may bypass the restriction on focus depth and present enough lateral resolution at low magnification. Finally, correlative fractography can provide the general comprehension of fracture processes, with the benefits of the association of different resolution scales and contrast modes.

Keywords

compositescorrelative microscopylight microscopyelectron microscopyfractography
Type
Materials Applications and Techniques
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 1475 - 1481
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASTM D5528-13 (2013). Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org, doi: 10.1520/D5528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, J.P., Baker, F.S., Thiel, B.L. & Donald, A.M. (2002). Consequences of positive ions upon imaging in low vacuum scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 205, 96–105.Google Scholar
Forster, B., Ville, D.V., Berent, J., Sage, D. & Unser, M. (2004). Complex wavelets for extended depth-of-field: A new method for the fusion of multichannel microscopy images. Microsc Res Tech 65, 33–42.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, E.S. (2009). Failure Analysis and Fractography of Polymer Composites. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. 595 pp.Google Scholar
Hein, L.R.O., Campos, K.A. & Caltabiano, P.C.R.O. (2012 a). Low voltage and variable-pressure scanning electron microscopy of fractured composites. Micron 43, 1039–1049.Google Scholar
Hein, L.R.O., Oliveira, J.A. & Campos, K.A. (2013 a). Correlative fractography: Combining scanning electron microscopy and light microscopes for qualitative and quantitative analysis of fracture surfaces. Microsc Microanal 19, 496–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hein, L.R.O., Oliveira, J.A. & Campos, K.A. (2013 b). Correlative light-electron fractography for fatigue striations characterization in metallic alloys. Microsc Res Tech 76, 909–913.Google Scholar
Hein, L.R.O., Campos, K.A., Caltabiano, P.C.R.O. & Kostov, K.G. (2013 c). A brief discussion about image quality and SEM methods for quantitative fractography of polymer composites. Scanning 35, 196–204.Google Scholar
Hein, L.R.O., Oliveira, J.A., Campos, K.A. & Caltabiano, P.C.R.O. (2012 b). Extended depth from focus reconstruction using NIH ImageJ plug-ins: Quality and resolution of elevation maps. Microsc Res Tech 75, 1593–1607.Google Scholar
Hull, D. (1999). Fractography: Observing, Measuring, and Interpreting Fracture Surface, Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 366 pp.Google Scholar
Hull, D. & Clyne, T.W. (1996). An Introduction to Composite Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Joy, D.C. (2002). SMART—a program to measure SEM resolution and imaging performance. J Microsc 208, 24–34.Google Scholar
Paluszyński, J. & Slówko, W. (2009). Measurements of the surface microroughness with the scanning electron microscope. J Microsc 233, 10–17.Google Scholar
Potter, R.T. & Purslow, D. (1983). The environmental degradation of notched CFRP in compression. Composites 14, 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purslow, D. (1981). Some fundamental aspects of composites fractography. Composites 12, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purslow, D. (1984). Composites fractography without an SEM—the failure analysis of a CFRP I-beam. Composites 15, 43–48.Google Scholar
Purslow, D. (1986). Matrix fractography of fibre-reinforced epoxy composites. Composites 17, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purslow, D. (1987 a). Matrix fractography of fibre-reinforced thermoplastics, part 1: Peel failures. Composites 18, 365–374.Google Scholar
Purslow, D. (1987 b). Further fractographic characteristics of peel failures in CFRP. Composites 18, 255–256.Google Scholar
Purslow, D. (1988 a). Matrix fractography of fibre-reinforced thermoplastics, part 2: Shear failures. Composites 19, 115–126.Google Scholar
Purslow, D. (1988 b). Fractography of fibre-reinforced thermoplastics, part 3: Tensile, compressive and flexural failures. Composites 19, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purslow, D. & Potter, R.T. (1984). The effect of environment on the compression strength of notched CFRP—a fractographic investigation. Composites 15, 112–120.Google Scholar
Rasband, W.S. (2015). ImageJ, 1997–2014. Bethesda, MD, USA: US National Institutes of Health. Available at http://imagej.nih.gov/ij.Google Scholar
Sawyer, L.C., Grubb, D.T. & Meyers, G.F. (2008). Polymer Microscopy, 3rd ed New York, NY: Springer. 540 pp.Google Scholar
Valdecasas, A.G., Marshall, D., Becerra, J.M. & Terrero, J.J. (2001). On the extended depth of focus algorithms for brightfield microscopy. Micron 32, 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar