Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

3DEM Data Collection of Cancer Biopsies: Comparing FIB-SEM and SBF-SEM

  • Jessica L. Riesterer (a1) (a2), Kevin Loftis (a1), Kevin Stoltz (a1), Erin Stempinski (a1) (a2), Melissa Williams (a1) (a2), Claudia S. López (a1) (a2) (a3), Guillaume Thibault (a1) and Joe W. Gray (a1)...
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      3DEM Data Collection of Cancer Biopsies: Comparing FIB-SEM and SBF-SEM
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      3DEM Data Collection of Cancer Biopsies: Comparing FIB-SEM and SBF-SEM
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      3DEM Data Collection of Cancer Biopsies: Comparing FIB-SEM and SBF-SEM
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: riesterj@ohsu.edu

References

Hide All
[1]Creech, M et al. , Scientific Reports [Online] 7, 40766 (2017), http://www.nature.com/articles/srep40766.
[2]Jorgens, D et al. , Journal of Cell Science 130 (2017), p. 177.
[3]Su, Y et al. , Genes & Development 32 (2018), p. 1398.
[4]Peddie, C and Collinson, L, Micron 61 (2014), p. 9.
[5]Belevich, I et al. , PLoS Biology 14 (2016), p. e1002340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002340.
[6]Loftis, K et al. , Quantitative BioImaging (2019).
[7]Electron microscopy was performed at the Multiscale Microscopy Core (MMC) with technical support from the OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine (OCSSB). The authors acknowledge funding from the OHSU Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, the Prospect Creek Foundation and the OCSSB. Ms. Sharon Frase and Dr. Danielle Jorgens are thanked for discussions and contributions to this work.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed