Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:55:43.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence of Prehistoric Cultivation of Douglas-Fir Trees at Mesa Verde1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Robert F. Nichols
Affiliation:
Wetherill Mesa Archeological Project, Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado
David G. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Abstract

Three trees which began growing in the 12th century lean in a manner not characteristic of neighboring Douglas-firs and have tree-ring patterns showing changes that do not appear to reflect climatic influences. Two old trees, now dead, have limb stubs that were cut by stone tools. It is possible the prehistoric Indians cultivated trees so that in a relatively short time a single root system would produce several limbs suitable for use as construction timbers.

Type
2 Anthropology
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1965 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This is Contribution No. 21 of the Wetherill Mesa Archeological Project.

References

Bannister, Bryant and Smiley, Terah L. 1955 Dendrochronology. In “Geochronology,” edited by Smiley, Terah L., pp. 177–95. University of Arizona Physical Science Bulletin, No. 2. Tucson.Google Scholar
Fritts, Harold C. 1963 Computer Programs in Tree-Ring Research. Tree-Ring Bulletin, Vol. 25, Nos. 3-4, pp. 27. Tucson.Google Scholar
Glock, Waldo S. 1937 Principles and Methods of Tree-Ring Analysis Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publicatioi No. 486. Washington.Google Scholar
Schulman, Edmund 1946 Dendrochronology at Mesa Verde National Park. Tree-Ring Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1824. Tucson.Google Scholar
Schulman, Edmund 1947 An 800-year Douglas Fir at Mesa Verde. Tret Ring Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 28. Tucson.Google Scholar