Baker, E.W. and Whartorr., G.W. 1952. An introduction to acarology. Macmillan, N.Y.465 + xiii pp.Google Scholar

Behan, V. 1978. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O., Sheals, J.G., and MacFarlane, D.. 1961. The Terrestrial Acari of the Britishlsles. Vol. 1. Introduction and Biology. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London. 219 pp.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1969. Adaptation to parasitism in mites. Acarologio 11: 429–449.Google Scholar

Hammen, L. van der. 1977 a. The evolution of the coxa in mites and other groups of Chelicerata. Acarologia 19: 12–19.Google Scholar

Hammen, L. van der. 1977b. A new classification of Chelicerata. Zool. Meded., Leiden 51: 307–319.Google Scholar

Hill, S.B. 1978. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Hughes, T.E. 1959. Mites or the Acari. Univ. of London, Athlone Press. 225 + viii pp.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1978. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Kethley, J.B. 1970. A revision of the family Syringophilidae (Prostigmata: Acarina). Contr. Am. ent. Inst., Vol. 5, No.6. 76 pp.Google Scholar

Kethley, J.B. 1978. Personal communicarion.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Inc., Corvallis. xx + 509pp.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. and Lindquist., E.E. 1979. Evolution of phytophagous mites (Acari). A. Rev. Ent. 24: 121–158.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E.E. 1975. Associations between mites and other arthropods in forest floor habitats. Can. Ent. 101: 425–437.Google Scholar

Main, B.Y. 1972. Subphylum V: Chelicerata. pp. 411–480, in Marshall, A.J. and Williams, W.D. (Eds.), Textbook of Zoology, Invertebrates. 7th ed. Macmillan, London. Vol. 1, xix + 874 pp.Google Scholar

Matthewman, W.G. and Pielou., D.P. 1971. Arthropods inhabiting the sporophores of Fomes fomentarius (Polyporaceae) in Gatineau Park, Quebec. Can. Ent. 103:775–847.Google Scholar

Moser, J.C. and Roton., L.M. 1971. Mites associated with southern pine bark beetles in Allen Parish, Louisiana. Can. Ent. 103: 1775–1798.Google Scholar

Price, D.W. 1975. Vertical distribution of small arthropods in a California nine forest soil. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 174–180.Google Scholar

Price, P.W. 1975. Introduction: the parasitic way of life and its consequences. pp. 1–13 in Price, P.W. (Ed.), Evolutionary strategies of parasitic insects and mites. Plenum Press, New York and London. xi + 224pp.Google Scholar

Price, P.W. 1977. General concepts on the evolutionary biology of parasites. Evolution 31: 405–420.Google Scholar

Whitaker, J.O. Jr. and Wilson, N.. 1974. Host and distribution lists of mires (Acari), parasitic and phoretic, in the hair of wild mammals of North America, north of Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 1–67.Google Scholar

Zakhvatkin, A.A. 1952. [Division of the mites into orders and their position in the system of the Chelicerata.] (In Russian.) Parazit. Sbornik, Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 14: 5–46.Google Scholar

Athias-Henrior, C. 1972. Gamasides Chiliens (Arachnides). II. Revision de la famille Ichthyostomatogasteridae Sellnick, 1953 (:Uropodellidae Camin, 1955). Arq. Zool., S. Paulo 22: 113–191 12pl.Google Scholar

Baker, E.W., Evans, T.M., Gould, D.J., Hull, W.B., and Keegan., H.L. 1956. A manual of parasitic mites of nredical or economic importance. Natn. Pest Control Assoc. Tech. Publ. 170 pp.Google Scholar

Barker, P.S. 1967. Bionomics of Blattisocius keegani (Fox) (Acarina: Ascidae), a predator on eggs of pests of stored grains. Can. J. Zool. 45: 1093–1099.Google Scholar

Behan, V. 1978. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Blaszak, C. 1976. A revision of the family Zerconidae (Acari, Mesostigmata) (Systematic studies on family Zerconidae -I). Acarologia 17: 553–569.Google Scholar

Bregetova, N.G. 1956. [Gamasid Mites (Gamasoidea), a Concise Key.] (In Russian.) Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, Izdavaemye Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 61. 248 pp.Google Scholar

Burnert, T. 1964. An acarine predator-prey population infesting stored products. Can. J. Zool. 42: 655–673.Google Scholar

Burnert, T. 1977. Biological models of two acarine predators of the grain mite, Acarus siro L. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1312–1323.Google Scholar

Camin, J.H. 1955. Uropodellidae, a new family of mesostigmatid mites based on Uropodella laciniata Berlese, 1888 (Acarina: Liroaspina). Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 10: 65–81.Google Scholar

Camin, J.H. and Gorirossi., F.E. 1955. A revision of the suborder Mesostigmata based on new interpretations of comparative morphological data. Chicago Acad. Sci. Spec. Publ. 11. 70 pp.Google Scholar

Chant, D.A. 1963. The subfamily Blattisocinae Garman (: Aceosejinae Evans) (Acarina: Blattisocidae Garman) (=Aceosejidae Baker and Wharton) in North America, with descriptions of new species. Can. J. Zool. 41: 243–305.Google Scholar

Chant, D.A. 1965. Generic concepts in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Ent. 97: 351–374.Google Scholar

Chant, D.A. and Hansell, R.I.C.. 1971. The genus Amblyseias (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Canada and Alaska. Con. J. Zool. 49: 703–758.Google Scholar

Chant, D.A., Hansell, R.I.C., and Yoshida, E.. 1974. The genus Typhlodromas Scheufen (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Canada and Alaska. Can. J. Zool. 52: 1265–1291.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. 1955a. A collection of mesostigmatid mites from Alaska. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Zool.) 2: 287–307.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. 1955b. A revision of the family Epicriidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Zool.) 3: 171–200.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. 1957. An introduction to the British Mesostigmata (Acarina) with keys to families and genera. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 43: 203–259.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. and Hyatt., K.H. 1958. The genera Podocinum Berl. and Podocinella gen. nov. (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 12, 10: 913–932.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. and Hyatt., K.H. 1960. A revision of the Platyseiinae (Mesostigmata: Aceosejidae). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Zool.) 6: 25–101.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. and Till., W.M. 1966. Studies on the British Dermanyssidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Part II. Classification. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Zool.) 14: 109–370.Google Scholar

Farrier, M.H. 1957. A revision of the Veigaiidae (Acarina). N. Carol. agric. Exp. Stn Tech. Bull. 124. 103 pp.Google Scholar

Furman, D.P. and Smith, A.. 1973. In vitro development of two species of Orthohalarachne (Acarina: Halarachnidae) and adaptations of the life cycle for endoparasitism in mammals. J. med. Ent. 10: 415–416.Google Scholar

Gilyarov, M.S. (Ed.). 1977. [A Key to the soil-inhabiting mites. Mesostigmata.] (In Russian.) Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”, Leningrad. 718 pp.Google Scholar

Halašková, V. 1977. A revision of the genera of the family Zerconidae (Acari: Gamasides) and descriptions of new taxa from several areas of Nearctic Region. Stud. C̆skostov. Akad. Ved, No.7. 74 pp.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, W. 1960. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes, Teil 3. Die Gattung Dendrolaelaps Halbert 1951. Acarologie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 3, 1–27 pp., 28 pl.Google Scholar

Hunter, P.E. and Glover, S.. 1968. The genus Diarthrophallus Tragardh 1946 (Acarina: Diarthrophallidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 10: 193–197.Google Scholar

Hughes, A.M. 1976. The mites of stored food and houses. Ministry Agric., Fish. Food Tech. Bull. 9. 400 pp.Google Scholar

Hurlbutt, H. 1967. Digamasellid mites associated with bark beetles and litter in North America. Acarologia 9: 497–534.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1962. Ixodorhynchine mite ectoparasites of snakes. L Descriptions of a new genus and three new species from the Nearctic Region (Acarina-Mesostigmata). Bult. Annls Soc. R. Belg. Ent. 98: 235–239.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1968. An Atlas of Acari. I. The families of Parasitiformes and Opilioacariformes. Acarol. Lab., Ohio Srate Univ. x + 110 pp.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1978. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Karg, W. 1965. Larvalsystematische und phylogenetische Untersuchung sowie Revision des Systems der Gamasina Leach, 1915 (Acarina, Parasitiformes). Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 41:193–340.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1971. 59. Teil. Acari (Acarina), Milben. Unterordnung Anactinochaeta (Parasitiformes). Die freilenbenden Gamasina (Gamasides), Raubmilben. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands. 475 pp.Google Scholar

Keegan, H.L. 1951. The mites of the subfamily Haemogamasinae (Acari: Laelaptidae). Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 101: 203–268.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1960. A re-evaluation of the Parholaspinae Evans 1956 (Mesostigmata: Macrochelidae). Acarologia 2: 393–433.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1961. A re-evaluation of the Microgynioidea, with a description of a new species of Microgynium (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Acarologia 3: 1–10.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1962. A review of the genera of the family Macrochelidae Vitzthum 1930 (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Acarologia 4: 143–173.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Inc., Corvallis. xx + 509pp.Google Scholar

Lee, D.C. 1970. The Rhodacaridae (Acari: Mesostigmata): classification, external morphology and distribution of genera. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 16: 1–219.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E.E. 1975. Digamasellus Berlese, 1905, and Dendrolaelaps Halbert, 1915, with descriptions of new taxa of Digamasellidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Ent. 107: 1–43.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E.E. and Evans., G.O. 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 47. 64pp.Google Scholar

Marshall, V.G. and Kevan., D.K. McE. 1964. Mesostigmata and Trombidiformes (Acarina) from two Quebec woodland humus forms. Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 9: 54–67.Google Scholar

McGraw, J.R. and Farrier., M.H. 1969. Mites of the superfamily Parasitoidea (Acarina: Mesostigmata) associated with Dendroctonus and Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). N. Carol. agric. Exp. Stn Tech. Bult. 192. 162pp.Google Scholar

McMurtry, J.A., Huffaker, C.B., and van de Vrie, M.. 1970. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: a review. I. Tetranychid enemies: their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia 40: 331–390.Google Scholar

OConnor, B.M. 1978. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Pence, D.B. 1975. Keys, species and host list, and bibliography for nasal mites of North American birds (Acarina: Rhinonyssidae, Turbinoptidae, Speleognathinae, and Cytoditidae). Spec. Publ. Mus. Tex. Tech. Univ. 8. 148 pp.Google Scholar

Radovsky, F.J. 1967. The Macronyssidae and Laelapidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) parasitic on bats. univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 46. 288 pp.Google Scholar

Radovsky, F.J. 1969. Adaptive radiation in the parasitic Mesostigmata. Acarologia 11: 450–483.Google Scholar

Richards, L.A. and Richards., K.W. 1976. Parasitid mites associated with bumblebees in Alberta, Canada (Acarina: Parasitidae; Hymenoptera: Apidae). II. Biology. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 51: 1–18.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, J.G., Singh, P., and Taylor, B.. 1970. Manure rnites and their role in fly control. J. med. Ent. 7: 335–341.Google Scholar

Rudnick, A. 1960. A revision of the mites of the family Spinturnicidae (Acarina). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 17: 157–284.Google Scholar

Sellnick, M. 1958. Die Familie Zerconidae Berlese. Acta Zool. 3: 313–368.Google Scholar

Strandtmann, R.W. and Wharton., G.W. 1958. Manual of mesostigmatid mites parasitic on vertebrates. Inst. Acarology, Univ. Maryland, Contr. 4. vii + 330 pp., 69 pl.Google Scholar

Tipton, V.J. 1960. The genus Laelaps with a review of the Laelaptinae and a new subfamily Alphalaelaptinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 16: 233–356.Google Scholar

Trägârdh, I. 1946. Diarthrophallina, a new group of Mesostigmata, found on passalid beetles. Ent. Meddr 24: 369–394.Google Scholar

Whitaker, J.O. Jr. and Wilson, N.. 1974. Host and distribution lists of mites (Acari), parasitic and phoretic, in the hair of wild mammals of North America, north of Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 1–67.Google Scholar

Camin, J.H. 1953. A revision of the cohort Trachytina Trägӑrdh, 1938, with the description of Dyscritaspis whartoni, a new genus and species of polyaspid mites from treeholes. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 9: 335–385.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O. 1957. An introduction to the British Mesostigmata (Acarina) with keys to families and genera. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 43:203–259.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, W. and Zirngiebl-Nicol, I.. 1961. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 4. Die Gattung Trichouropoda Berlese 1916 nov. comb., die Cheliceren und das System der Uropodiden. Acarologie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 4, 1–41 pp., 16 pl.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, W. 1978. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teile 267-269, 273, 275, 276. Acorotogie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 24, 1–129 pp., 20 pl.Google Scholar

Hughes, A.M. 1976. The mites of stored food and houses. Ministry Agric., Fish. Food Tech. Bull. 9. 400 pp.Google Scholar

Jalil, M. and Rodriguez., J.G. 1970. Biology of and odor perception by Fuscuropoda vegetans (Acarina: Uropodidae), a predator of the house fly. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 935–938.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1961. A review of the lower uropodoid mites (former Thinozerconoidea, Protodinychoidea and Trachyroidea) with notes on the classification of the Uropodina (Acarina). Acarologia 3: 522–545.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1961. The biology and ecology of granary mites of the Pacific Northwest. I. Ecological considerations. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 169–174.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Corvallis. xx + 509 pp.Google Scholar

Sinha, R.N. 1964. Ecological relationships of stored-product mites and seedborne fungi. Acarologia 6 (fasc. hors sér.): 372–389.Google Scholar

Stone, P. and Ogles., G.D. 1953. Uropoda agitans, a mite pest in commercial fishworm beds. J. econ. Ent. 46:711.Google Scholar

Banks, N. 1909. New Canadian mites. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 11: 133–143, pl. x-xiii.Google Scholar

Berlese, A. 1910. Brevi diagnosi di generi e specie nuovi di Acari. Redia 6: 346–388.Google Scholar

Camin, J.H. and Gorirossi., F.E. 1955. A revision of the suborder Mesostigmata based on new interpretations of comparative morphological data. Chicogo Acad. Sci. Spec. Publ. 11. 70 pp.Google Scholar

Donisthorpe, H.St.J.K. 1927. The guests of British ants, their habits and life-histories. G. Routledge and Sons, London. xxiii + 244 pp.Google Scholar

Funk, R.C. 1964. An investigation of the Euzerconidae (Mesostigmata: Celaenopsoidea) based on the procedures of numerical taxonomy. Acorologia 6 (fasc. hors sér.): 127–132.Google Scholar

Funk, R.C. 1968. Revision of the family Euzerconidae and its relationships within the superfamily Celaenopsoiclea (Acarina: Mesostigmata), aided by the techniques of numerical taxonomy. Ph.D. Dissert., Univ. Kansas. Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich.485 pp. (Diss. Abstr. 30: 439-B.)Google Scholar

Hunter, P.E. and Davis, R.. 1965. Mites associated with the passalus beetle. III. Life stages and observationson the biology of Euzercon latus (Banks) (Acarina:Euzerconidae). Acarologia 7: 30–42.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. 1978. Personal communication (with E.E. Lindquist).Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E., Johnston, G.E., and DeGiusti., D.L. 1957. Observations on Micromegistus bakeri Trägårdh, 1948, (Acarina: Mesostigmata: Parantennulidae) an antennophoroid mite occurring on Scatrites beetles. In Program, abstracts, 32nd annual meeting, Amer. Soc. Parasitol., Philadelphia, Penn., Abst. No. 87. J. Parasit. 43 (5, Sect. 2): 35.Google Scholar

Kethley, J.B. 1977 a. An unusual parantennuloid, Philodana johnstoni n.g., n.sp. (Acari: Parasitiformes: Philodanidae, n.fam.) associated with Neatus tenebrioides (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in North America. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 70: 487–494.Google Scholar

Kethley, J.B. 1977 b. A review of the higher categories of Trigynaspida (Acari: Parasitiformes). Int. J. Acar. 3: 129–149.Google Scholar

Kinn, D.N. 1971. The life cycle and behavior of Cercoleipus coelonotus (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 65: 1–62, pl. 1–2.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Inc., Corvallis. xx + 509pp.Google Scholar

Moser, J.C. and Roton., L.M. 1971. Mites associated with southern pine bark beetles in Allen Parish, Louisiana. Con. Ent. 103: 1775–1798.Google Scholar

Nickel, P.A. and Elzinga., R.J. 1970. Biology of Micromegistus bakeri Trägârdh, 1948 (Acarina: Parantennulidae) with descriptions of immatures and redescription of adults. Acarologia 12:234–243.Google Scholar

Pearse, A.S., Pafterson, M.T., Rankin, J.S., and Wharton., G.W. 1936. The ecology of Passalus cornutus Fabricius, a beetle that lives in rotting logs. Ecol. Monogr. 6: 455–490.Google Scholar

Trägârdh, I. 1941. Contributions towards the comparative morphology and phylogeny of the Mesostigmata. IV. On the Celaenopsidae and Euzerconidae. Ent. Tidskr. 62:169–176.Google Scholar

Trägârdh, I. 1950. Srudies on the Celaenopsidae, Diplogyniidae and Schizogynridae (Acarina). Ark. Zool., ser. 2. 1: 161–451.Google Scholar

Anon. 1970. Incidence of rare notifiable disease in Canada 1929-69. Health and Welfare Div., Dom. Bur. Stats., Ottawa.Google Scholar

Burgdorfer, W. 1975. A review of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (tick-borne typhus), its agent and its tick vectors in the United States. J. med. Ent. 12:269–278.Google Scholar

Camicas, J.L. and Morel., P.C. 1977. Position sysrematique et classification des tiques (Acarida: Ixodida). Acorologia 18: 410–420.Google Scholar

Clifford, C.M., Anastos, G., and Elbl, A.. 1961. The larval ixodid ticks of the Eastern United States (Acarina - Ixodidae). Misc. Publ. ent. Soc. Am. 2:213–237.Google Scholar

Gregson, J.D. 1956. The Ixodoidea of Canada. Con. Dep. Agric., Ottawa, Publ. 930. 92pp.Google Scholar

Gregson, J.D. 1973. Tick Paralysis, an appraisal of natural and experimental data. Can. Dep. Agric. Monogr. 9. 109 pp.Google Scholar

Kettyls, G.D., Verral, V.M., Wilton, L.D., Clapp, J.F., Clarke, D.A., and Rublee., J.D. 1972. Arbovirus infections in man in British Columbra. Can. med. Ass. J. 106:1175–1179.Google Scholar

Kohls, G.M., Sonenshine, D.E., and Clifford., C.M. 1965. The systematics of the subfamily Ornithodorinae (Acarina: Argasidae), II. Identification of the larvae of the Western Hemisphere and description of three new species. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 331–364.Google Scholar

Newhouse, V.F., McKiel, J.A., and Burgdorfer, W.. 1964. California Encephalitis, Colorado Tick Fever, and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever in Eastern Canada. Can. J. Pub. Hlth 55: 257–261.Google Scholar

Rich, G.B. 1957. The ear tick, Otobius megnini (Dugès) (Acarina: Argasidae) and its record in British Columbia. Can. J. comp. Med. 21: 415–418.Google Scholar

Watson, T.G. and Anderson., R.C. 1976. Ixodes scapularis Say on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginionus) from Long Point, Ontario. J. Wildl. Dis. 12: 66–71.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, P.R. 1967. The distribution of Dermocentor ricks in Canada in relation to bioclimatic zones. Can. J. Zool. 45:517–537.Google Scholar

Atyeo, W.T. 1960. A revision of the mite family Bdellidae in North and Central America. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 40: 345–499.Google Scholar

Baker, E.W. 1965. A review of the genera of the family Tydeidae (Acarina). Advances in Acarology 2: 95–133.Google Scholar

Baker, E.W. and Hoffman, A.. 1948. Acaros de la familia Cunaxidae. An. Esc. Nac. Cienc. Biol. (Méx.) 5: 229–273.Google Scholar

Baker, E.W. and Pritchard., A.E. 1953. The family categories of tetranychoid mites, with a review of the new families Linotetranidae and Tuckerellidae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 46: 243–258.Google Scholar

Baker, R.A. 1973. Notes on the internal anatomy, the food requirements and development in the family Ereynetidae (Trombidiform es). Acaro1ogia 15: 43–52.Google Scholar

Beer, R.E. 1954. A revision of the Tarsonemidae of the western hemisphere (Order Acarina). Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 36: 1091–1387.Google Scholar

Beer, R.E. and A. Nucifora. 1965. Revisione dei generi della famiglia Tarsonemidae (Acarina). Boll. Zool. Agr. Bachic., Ser. 2, 7: 19–43.Google Scholar

Brennan, J.M. and Goff., M.L. 1977. Keys to the genera of chiggers of the Western Hemisphere. J. Parasit. 63: 554–566.Google Scholar

Brennan, J.M. and Jones., E.K. 1959. Keys to the chiggers of North America with synonymic notes and descriptions of two new genera (Acarina:Trombiculidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52: 7–16.Google Scholar

Bronswijk, J.E.M.H. van and de Kreek, E.J.. 1976. Cheyletiella (Acari:Cheyletiellidae) of dog, cat and domesticated rabbit. a review. J. med. Ent. 13: 315–327.Google Scholar

Burnett, T. 1977. Biological models of two acarine predators of the grain mite, Acarus siro L. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1312–1323.Google Scholar

camin, J.H., Moss, W.W., Oliver, J.H. Jr., and Singer, G.. 1967. Cloacaridae, a new family of cheyletoid mites from the cloaca of aquatic turtles (Acari: Acariformes: Eleutherengona). J. med. Ent. 4: 261–272.Google Scholar

Coineau, Y. 1977. La première prĺarve élattostatique connue chez les Acariens. Acarologia 19: 46–54.Google Scholar

Cook, D.R. 1974. Water mite genera and subgenera. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 21. 860 pp.Google Scholar

Cross, E.A. 1965. The generic relationships of the family Pyemotidae (Acarina: Trombidiformes). Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 45: 29–275.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Hyland., K.E. 1975. Speleognathinae collected from birds in North America (Acarina: Ereynetidae). Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 83: 203–208.Google Scholar

Gerson, U. 1972. Mites of the genus Ledermuelleria (Prostigmata:Stigmaeidae) associated with mosses in Canada. Acarologia 13: 319–343.Google Scholar

Gill, D. and Strandtmann., R.W. 1977. Ectoparasites of the collared lemming (Dicrostonyx torquatus) on Bathurst Island, N.W.T., Canada. J. med. Ent. 14: 101–106.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.H. 1965. A taxonomic study of the genera Mediolata, zetzellia and Agistemus (Acarina: Stigmaeidae). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 41: 1–64.Google Scholar

Hughes, A.M. 1976. The Mites of Stored Food and Houses. Ministy Agric., Fish. Food Tech. Bull. 9. 400 pp.Google Scholar

Jameson, E.W. 1955. A summary of the genera of Myobiidae (Acarina). J. Parasit. 41: 407–415.Google Scholar

Jeppscn, L.R., Keifer, H.H., and Baker., E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. xxiv + 614 pp., 64 pl.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. and DeGiusti., D.L. 1961. Ecological and systematic notes on some chigger-mites of the genera Gahrliepia, Trambicula, and Euschongastia in Michigan and Ontario. J. Psrdsit. 47: 11.Google Scholar

Keifer, H.H. 1946. A review of North American economic eriophyid mites. J. Econ. Ent. 39: 563–570.Google Scholar

Keihley, J.B. 1970. A revision of the family Syringophilidae (Prostigmata: Acarina). Contr. Am. ent. Inst., Vol. 5, No. 6. 76 pp.Google Scholar

Kok, N.J.J., Lukoschus, F.S.. and Clulow, F.V.. 1970. Psorobia castoris spec. nov. (Acarina: Psorcrgatidae), a new itch mite from the beaver, Castor canadensis. Can. J. Zool. 48: 1419–1423.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Srores, Inc., Corvalhs. xx + 509pp.Google Scholar

Krarrtz, G.W. and Lindquist., E.E. 1979. Evolution of phytophagous mites (Acari). A. Rev. Ent. 24: 121–158.Google Scholar

Krczal, H. 1959. Systematik und Ökologie der Pyemotiden. Beitr. Syst. Ökol. mitteleur. Acarina 1, Abschn. 3: 385–625.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E.E. 1969. Review of holarctic tarsonemid mites (Acarina: Prostigmata) parasitizing eggs of iprnebark beerles. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 60. 111 pp.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E.E. 1972. A nerv species of Torsonemus from stored graill (Acarina: Tarsonemidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1699–1708.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E.E. 1976. Transfer of rhe Tarsocheylidae to the Heterostigmata, and reassignment of Tarsenemina and Heterostigmata 10 lower hierarchic status in the Prostigmata (Acari). Can. Ent. 108: 23–48.Google Scholar

Luxton, M. 1973. Mites of the genus Cryptognathus from Ausiralia, New Zealand, and Niue Island. Acarologia 15: 53–75.Google Scholar

Mahunka, S. 1965. Identification key for the species of the family Scutacaridae (Acari: Tarsonemini). Acta Zool. Aced. Sci. Hung. 11:353–401.Google Scholar

Mahunka, S. 1970. Considerations on the systematics of the Tarsonemina and the description of new European taxa (Acari: Trombidiforrnes). Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 16: 137–174.Google Scholar

Mahunka, S. 1975. Further data to the knowleclge of Tarsonemida (,Acari) living on small mammals in North America. Parasit. Hung. 8: 85–94.Google Scholar

Marshall, V.G. 1970. Tydeid mites (Acarina: Prostigmata) from Canada. I. New and redescribed species of Lorryia. Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 15: 17–52.Google Scholar

Marshall, V.G. 1918. Pelsonal communication.Google Scholar

Marshall, V.G. and Kevan, D.K. McE.. 1964. Mesostigmata and Trombidiformes (Acarina) frorn two Quebec woodland humus forms. Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 9: 54–67.Google Scholar

Matshall, V.G. and Lindquist., E.E. 1972. Notes on the genus Nalepella (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) and the occurrence oi N. halourga on Black Spruce in Canada. Can. Ent. 104: 239–244.Google Scholar

Meyer, M.K.P.Smith, . 1974. Arevision of the Tetranychidae of Alrica (Acari), with a key to the genera of the world. Ent. Mem., Dep. Agric. Tech. Serv., Repub. S. Afr., No. 36. 291 pp.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R.D. 1957. Major evolutionary lines in water mites. Syst. Zool. 6: 137–148.Google Scholar

Mitrofanov, V.I 1975. [Lindquistiella gen. n. (Trombidiformes, Bryobiidae, Petrobiini) from the eastern coast of Canada]. (In Russian.) Zool. Zh. 55: 1256–1257.Google Scholar

Moser, J.C. 1975. Biosystcmatics of the straw itch mite with special reference to nomenclature and dermatology. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 127: 185–191.Google Scholar

Moser, J.C. and Cross., E.A. 1975. Phoretomorph: a new phoretic phase unique to the Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea). Ann. ent. Sot. Am. 68: 820–822.Google Scholar

Moss, W.W. 1960. Description and mating behaviour of Allothrombium lerouxi, new species (Acarina: Trombidiidae), a predator of small arthropods in Quebec apple orchards. Can. Ent. 92: 898–905.Google Scholar

Moss, W.W., Oliver, J.H. Jr., and Nelson., B.C. 1968. Karyotypes and developmental srages of Harpyrhynchus novoplumoris sp. n. (Acari:Cheyletoidea: Harpyrhynchidae), a parasite of North American birds. J. Parasit. 54: 377–392.Google Scholar

Mulaik, S. and Altred, D.M.. 1954. New species and distribution records of the genus Caeculus in North America. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 56: 27–40.Google Scholar

Nerwell, I.M. 1947. A systematic and ecological srudy of the Halacaridae of eastern North America. Bull. Bingham Ocean. Coll. 10. 232pp.Google Scholar

Nerwell, I.M. 1957. Studies on the Johnstonianidae (Acari, Parasitengona). Pacif. Sci. 11: 396–466.Google Scholar

OConrrcr, B.M. 1978. A redescription of Speleorodens michiganensrs (Ford) n. cornb. (Acari: Ereynetidae), a nasal mite of microtine rodents, with comments on generic relationships in the Speleognathinae. Jl N. Y. ent. Soc. 86: 123–129.Google Scholar

Pritcharci, A.E. and Baker, E.W.. 1955. A revision of the spider niite family Tetranychidae. Mem. Pacif. Coast ent. Soc., Ser. 2. 472pp.Google Scholar

Pritcharci, A.E. and Baker, E.W.. 1958. The false spider mites (Acarina:Tenuipalpidae). Univ. Colif. Publs Ent. 14: 175–274.Google Scholar

Putman, W.L. 1970. Life history and behavior of Balaustium putmani (Acarina: Erythraeidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 75–81.Google Scholar

Rack, G. 1975. Phoretisch auf Kleinsaugern gefundene Arten der Gattung Pygmephorus (Acarina, Pygmephoridae). Mitt. Hamburg. Zool. Mus. Inst. 72: 157–176.Google Scholar

Reeves, R.M. 1963. Tetranychidae infesting woody plants in New York State, and a life history study of the Elm Spider Mite Eotetronychus matthyssei nsp. Mem. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn 380. 99 pp.Google Scholar

Regenfuss, H. 1968. Untersucliungen zur Morphoiogie, Systernatik und Ökotogie der Podapolipidae (Acarina, Tarsonernini). Z. Wiss. Zool. 117: 183–282.Google Scholar

Robaux, P. 1974. Recherches sur le développement et la biologie des acariens “Thrombidiidae”. Mém. Mus. natn. Hist.-nat., N.S., Sér. A, 85. 186 pp.Google Scholar

Schusrer, R.O. and Lavoipierre, M.M.J.. 1970. The mite family Heterocheylidae Tragardh. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci., No. 85. 42 pp.Google Scholar

Schuster, R. and Schuster, I.J.. 1977. Ernährungs- und fortpflanzungs-biologische Studien an der Milberrfamilie Nanorchestidae (Acari, Trombidiformes). Zool. Anz. 199: 89–94.Google Scholar

Slykhuis, J.T. 1963. Mite transmission of plant viruses. Advances in Acarology 1: 326–340.Google Scholar

Smiley, R.L. 1970. A review of the family Cheyletiellidae (Acarina). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1056–1078.Google Scholar

Smith, I.M, 1916. A study of the systematics of the water mite family Pionidae (Prostigmata: Parasitengona). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 98. 249 pp.Google Scholar

Smith, I.M. and Oliver., D.R. 1976. The parasilic associations of larval water mites with imaginai aquatic insects, especially Chironomidae. Can. Ent. 108: 1427–1442.Google Scholar

Sorensen, J.T., Kinn, D.N., Doutt, R.L., and Cate, J.R.. 1976. Biology of the mite, Anystis agilis (Acari: Anystidae): a California vineyard predator. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 905–910.Google Scholar

Southcott, R.V. 1961. Studies on the systematics of the Erythraeoidea (Acarina), with a critical revision of the genera and subfamilies. Aust. J. Zool. 9: 367–610.Google Scholar

Strandtmann, R.W. 1971. The eupodoid mites of Alaska (Acarina: Prostigmata). Pacif. Insects 13: 75–118.Google Scholar

Streu, H.T. and Gingrich, J.B.. 1972. Seasonal activity of the Winter Crain Mite in turfgrass in New Jersey. J. econ. Ent. 65: 427–434.Google Scholar

Surnmers, F.M. 1966 a. Key to the families of the Raphignathoidea (Acarina). Acarologia 8: 226–229.Google Scholar

Surnmers, F.M. 1966 b. Genera of the mite iamily Stigmaeidae Oudemans (Acarina). Acarologia 8: 230–250.Google Scholar

Summers, F.M. and Price., D.W. 1970. Review of the mite family Cheyletidae. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 61: 1–151.Google Scholar

Suski, Z.W. 1972. Tarsonemid mites on appie trees in Poland XI. Field observations on the distribution and significance of Tarsonemidae (Acarina, Heterostigmata) in apple orchards. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 129: 139–157.Google Scholar

Suski, Z.W. 1973. A revision of Siteroptes cerealium (Kirchner) complex (Acarina, Heterostigmata, Pyemotidae). Ann. Zool. (Warsaw) 30: 509–535.Google Scholar

Vercamrnen-Grandjean, P.-H. and Langston, R.. 1976. The chigger mites of the world. Vol. III. Leptotrombidium complex. Sect. A-C. Centr. Reprod. Serv., Univ. Calif., San Francisco. 1061 pp. + 298 pl.Google Scholar

Wallace, M.M.H. and Walters, M.C.. 1974. The introduction of Bdellodes lapidaria (Acari: Bdellidae) from Australia into South Africa for the biological control of Sminthurus viridis (Coltembola). Aust. J. Zool. 22: 505–517.Google Scholar

Wharton, G.W. and Fuller., H.S. 1952. A manual of the chiggers. Mem. ent. Soc. Wash. 4. 185 pp.Google Scholar

Wood, T.G. 1969. The Homocaligidae, a new family of mites (Acari:Raphignathoidea), including a description of a new species from Malaya and the British Solomon Islands. Acarologia 11: 711–729.Google Scholar

Wood, T.G. 1972. New and redescribed species of Zedermuelleria Oudms. and Villersia Oudms. (Acari: Stigmaeidae) from Canada. Acarologia 13: 301–318.Google Scholar

Whiraker, J.O. Jr. and Wilson, N.. 1974. Host and distribution lists of mites (Acari), parasitic and phoretic, in the hair of wild mammals of North America, north of Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 1–67.Google Scholar

Atyeo, W.T. 1978. Personal communication (with E.E. Lindquist).Google Scholar

Atyeo, W.T. and Braasch., N.L. 1966. The feather mite genus Proclophyllodes (Sarcoptiformes: Proctophyllodidae). Bull. Univ. Neb. St. Mus. 5. 354pp.Google Scholar

Baker, E.W., Evans, T.M., Gould, D.J., Hull, W.B., and Keegan., H.L. 1956. A Manual of Parasitic Mites of Medical or Economic Importance. Natl. Pest Control Assoc. Tech. Publ. 170 pp.Google Scholar

Barker, P.S. 1967. Effect of humidity and temperature on the biology of Aëroglyphus robustus (Banks) (Acarina: Glycyphagidae). Can. J. Zool. 45: 479–483.Google Scholar

Barker, P.S. 1968. Bionornics of Glycyphogus domesticus (de Geer) (Acarina: Glycyphagidae), a pest of stored grain. Can. J. Zool. 46: 89–92.Google Scholar

Delfinado, M.D. and Baker., E.W. 1976. Notes on hypopi (Acarina) associated with bees and wasps (Hymenoptera). Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 84: 76–90.Google Scholar

Dubinin, W.B. 1953. [Feather Mites (Analgesoidea). Part II. Familles Epidermoptidae and Freyanidae.] (In Russian.) Fauna SSSR, Paukoobraznye, Tom 6, No. 6. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, N.S., No. 55. 412pp.Google Scholar

Dubinin, W.B. 1956. [Feather mites (Analgesoidea). Part III. Family Pterolichidae.] (In Russian.) Faana SSSR, Paukoobraznye, Tom 6, No. 6. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, N.S., No. 63. 814pp.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1963. Les Acariens producteurs de gale chez les lemuriens et les singes avec une etude des Psoroptidae (Sarcoptiformes). Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. 39: 1–125.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1965. A review of the family Epidermoptidae Trouessart parasitic on the skin of birds (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Verhondl. Konin. Vlaam. Acad. Wetensch., Lett., Schone Kunsten Belg., No. 84, Part I 176pp., Part II (Figures). 144 pp.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1967 a. Les hypopes parasites des tissus cellulaires des oiseaux (Hypodectidae: Sarcoptiformes). Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. 43(4): 1–139.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1967 b. Le genre Dermatophagoides Bogdanov 1864 son irnportance dans les allergies respiratoires et cutanées chez l'homme (Psoroptidae: Sarcoptiformes). Acarologia 9:179–225.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1968. Etude de la variabilité de Sarcoptes scabiei avec une revision des Sarcoptidae. Acta Zool. Palhol. Antverp. 47:3–196.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1969 a. Adaptation to parasitism in mires. Acarologia 11: 429–449.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1969 b. Les deutonymphes hypopiales vivant en association phoretique sur les mammifdres (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. 45(33): 1–262.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1970. Redescription du type de Listrophorus validus Banks, 1910 (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 81: 125–132.Google Scholar

Fain, A. 1972. Notes sur les hypopes des Saproglyphidae (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes) II. Redéfinition des genres. Acarotogia 14: 225–249.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Bafort, J.. 1964. Les Acariens de la famille Cytoditidae (Sarcoptiformes). Description de sept espèces nouvelles. Acorologia 6: 504–528.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Elsen, P.. 1967. Les Acariens de la famille Knemidokoptidae producteurs de gale chez les orseaux. Acta Zool. Pathol. Antverp. 45. 142pp.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Hyland, K.. 1970. Notes on the Myocoptidae of North Arnerica with description of a new species on the Eastern Chipmunk, Tamias striatus Linnaeus. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 78: 80–87.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Hyland, K.. 1974. The listrophoroid mites in North America. IL The family L.istrophoridae Megnin and Trouessart (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg., Ent. 50(1): 1–69.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Johnston., D.E. 1970. Un nouvel acarien de la famille Audycoptidae chez l'ours noir Ursas americonus (Sarcoptiformes). Acta Zool. Pathol. Antverp. 50: 179–181.Google Scholar

Fain, A., Kok, N.J.J., Lukoschus, F.S., and Clulow., F.V. 1971. Notes on the hypopial nymphs phoretic on mammals in Canada with description of a new species (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Can. J. Zool. 49: 15–18.Google Scholar

Fain, A., Lukoschus, F.S., Kok, N.J.J., and Clulow, F.V.. 1974. A key to the genus Lutrilichas Fainand description of a new species from the ermine, Mustela erminea, in Canada (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Can. J. Zool. 52: 941–944.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Whitaker, J.O. Jr. 1973. Phoretic hypopi of North American mammals (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes, Glycyphagidae). Acarologia 15: 144–170.Google Scholar

Fain, A. and Whitaker, J.O. Jr. 1974. Gliricoptes zapus sp. n. (Acari: Myocoptidae) from Zapus from Washington and British Columbia. J. Parasit. 60: 1022–1024.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, C. and Threlfall, W.. 1977. The ectoparasites of three species of seabirds from New foundland, Canada. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1205–1209.Google Scholar

Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T.. 1967. Cinq genres nouveaux de la famille des Analgidae, Trouessart et Mégnin. Acarologio 9: 435–464.Google Scholar

Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T.. 1978. Nouvelles superfamilles pour les acariens astigmates parasites d'oiseaux. Acorologia 19: 678–685.Google Scholar

Gerson, U. 1967. Observations on Hemisarcoptes coccophogus Meyer (Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae), with a new synonym. Acarologia 9: 632–638.Google Scholar

Gilyarov, M.S. (Ed.). 1975, [A key to the Soil-inhabiting Mites Sarcoptiformes.] (In Russian.) Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”, Moscow. 492 pp.Google Scholar

Griffiths, D.A. 1970. A further sysremaric study of the genus Acarus L., 1758 (Acaridae, Acarina), with a key to species. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Zool.) 19: 85–118, 4 pl.Google Scholar

Harrison, R.J. and Loiselle, R.. 1978. Arthropodes du Québec d'importance médicale vétérinaire et autre, soumis pour identification en 1974 et 1975. Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 23: 197–202.Google Scholar

Hughes, A.M. 1976. The Mites of Stored Food and Houses. Ministry Agric., Fish. Food Tech. Bull. 9. 400pp.Google Scholar

Hughes, R.D. and Jackson., C.G. 1958. A review of the Anoetidae (Acari). Virginia J. Sci. 9, N.S. 1: 5–198.Google Scholar

Hyland, K.E. and Clark., D.T. 1959. The occurrence of the genus Yunkeracorus in North America (Acarina: Epidermoptidae). Acarologia 1: 365–369.Google Scholar

Jameson, E.W. 1950. The external parasites of the short-tailed shrew. J. Mammal. 31: 138–145.Google Scholar

Johnston, D.E. and Bruce., W.A. 1965. Tyrophagus neiswanderi, a new acarid mite of agricultural importance. Ohio agric. Res. Devel. Center, Res. Bull. 977. 17 pp.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Corvallis. xx + 509pp.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. and Lindquist., E.E. 1979. Evolution of phytophagous mites (Acari.) A. Rev. Ent. 24: 121–158.Google Scholar

Lavoipierre, M.M.J. 1959. A description of the male and female of Chorioptes crewei Lavoipierre 1958 (Acirina: Psoroptidae), together with some remarks on the family Psoroptidae and a key to the genera contained in the family. Acorologia 1: 354–364.Google Scholar

Lawrence, R.F. 1959. Acariens (Harpyrhynchidae, Listrophoridae) nouveau ou peu connus, parasltes d'oiseaux et de mammifères. Acarologia 1: 106–118.Google Scholar

Michael, A.D. 1884. The Hypopus question, or the life-history of certain Acarina. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 17: 371–394; 1 pl.Google Scholar

Nesbitt, H.H.J. 1945. A revision of the family Acaridae (Tyroglyphidae), order Acari, based on comparative morphological studies. Pt. 1. Historical, morphological, and general taxonomic studies. Can. J. Res. (D) 23: 139–188.Google Scholar

Nesbitt, H.H.J. 1954. A new mite, Zwickia gibsoni n.sp. from the pitchers of Sarracenia purpurea. Can. Ent. 86: 192–197.Google Scholar

OConnor, B.M. 1979. A new species of Ctenogtyphus (Acari: Ctenoglyphidae) from the Mongolian Gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with notes on the subfamily Ctenoglyphinae. J. med. Ent. 16, in Press.Google Scholar

Oconnor, B.M. and Reisen., W.K. 1978. Chiroptoglyphus, a new genus of mites associated with bats, with comments on the family Rosensteiniidae (Acari: Astigmata). Int. J. Acarol. 4: 179–194.Google Scholar

Oliver, J.H. Jr. 1962. A mite parasitic in the cocoons of earthworms. J. Parasit. 48. 120–123.Google Scholar

Park, C.K. and Atyeo., W.T. 1971. A generic revision of the Pterodectinae, a new subfamily of feather mites (Sarcoptiformes: Analgoidea). Bull. Univ. Neb. St. Mus. 9: 39–88.Google Scholar

Peterson, p.C. 1971. A revision of the feather mite genus Brephosceles (Proctophyllodidae: Alloptinae). Bull. Univ. Neb. St. Mus. 9: 89–172.Google Scholar

Price, D.W. 1976. Passage of Verticitlium albo-atrum propagules through the alimentary canal of the bulb mite. Phytopathology 66: 46–50.Google Scholar

Radford, C.D. 1955. Some new and little-known mites of the genus Myocoptes Claparede (Acarina: Listrophoridae). Parasitology 45: 275–286.Google Scholar

Samsinak, K. 1971. Die auf Carabus-Arten (Coleoptera, Adephaga) der palaearktischen Region lebenden Milben der Unterordnung Acariformes (Acari); ihre Taxonomie und Bedeutung für die Lösung zoogeographischer, entwicklungsbeschichtlicher une parasitophyletischer Fragen. Ent. Abhandl. 38: 145–234.Google Scholar

Samsinak, K. 1977. Rosensteinia hitcri sp. n., and a revision of the taxonomy and status of the family Rosensteiniidae. Acta Ent. Bohemoslov. 74: 419–425.Google Scholar

Scheucher, R. 1959. Systematik und Ökologie der deutschen Anoetinen. Beitr. Syst. Ökot. mitteteur. Acarina 1: 233–384.Google Scholar

Sinha, R.N. 1963. Stored product acarology in canada. Advonces in Acarology 1: 70–88.Google Scholar

Sinha, R.N. 1964. Mites of stored grain in western Canada—ecology and methods of survey. Proc. ent. Soc. Manitoba 20: 19–13.Google Scholar

Sinha, R.N. 1968. Adaptive significance of mycophagy in stored-product Arthropoda. Evolution 22 785–798.Google Scholar

Sinha, R.N. and Wallace, H.A.H.. 1973. Population dynamics of stored-product mites. Oecologia 12: 315–327.Google Scholar

Sweatman, G.K. 1957. Life history, non-specificiry and revision of the genus Chorioptes, a parasitic mite of herbivores. Can. J. Zoot. 35: 641–689.Google Scholar

Sweatman, G.K. 1958 a. On the populalion reduction of chorioptic mange mites on cattle in summer. Can. J. Zool. 36:391–397.Google Scholar

Sweatman, G.K. 1958 b. Redescription of Clorioptes texanus, a parasitic mite from the ears of reindeer in the Canadian Arctic. Can. J. Zool. 36: 525–528.Google Scholar

Sweatman, G.K. 1958 c. Biology af Otodectes cynolis, the ear canker mite of carnivores. Can. J. Zool. 36: 849–862.Google Scholar

Sweatman, G.K. 1958 d. On the life history and validity of the species in Psoroptes, a genus of mange mites. Can. J. Zool. 36: 905–929.Google Scholar

Sweatman, G.K. 1971. Mites and Pentastomes. In Davis, J.W. and Anderson, R.C. (Eds.), Parasitic diseases of wild mammals. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.364 pp.Google Scholar

Türk, E. and Türk, F.. 1959. Systematik und Ökologie der Tyroglyphiden Mitteleuropas. Beitr. Syst. Ökol. mitteleur. Acarina 1. 3–231.Google Scholar

Whitaker, J.O. Jr. and Wiison, N.. 1974. Host and distribution lists of mites (Acari), parasitic and phoretic, in the hair of wild nammals of North America, norrh of Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 1–67.Google Scholar

Wharton, C.W. 1976. House dusr mites. J. med. Ent. 12: 577–621.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. 1967. Ectoparasites of Canadian birds and mammals. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 69:349–353.Google Scholar

Yunker, C.E. 1913. Mires. Ch. 15, pp. 425–492in Flynn, R.J. (Ed.), Parasites of laboratory animals. Iowa St. Univ. Press, Ames. xvi + 884 pp.Google Scholar

Zakhvatkin, A.A. 1941. [Tyroglyphoid Mites (Tyroglyphoidea).] (In Russian.) Fauna SSSR, Paukoobraznye, Tom 6, No. 1 Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, N.S., No. 28. xii+ 475 pp. [1959 translation by Amer. lnst. Biol. Sci.: Fauna of U.S.S.R. Arachnoidea 6(1). Tyroglyphoidea (Acari). v + 573 pp.]Google Scholar

Allred, D.M. 1954. Mites as intermediate hosts of tapeworms. Proc. Utah Acad. Arts Lett. 31: 44–51.Google Scholar

Balogh, J. 1965. A synopsis of the world oribatid (Acari) genera. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 11: 5–99.Google Scholar

Balogh, J. 1972. Theoribatid genera of the world. Akad. Kiado, Budapest. 188 pp., 71 pl.Google Scholar

Evans, G.O., Sheals, J.G., and MacFarlane, D.. 1961. The terrestrial Acari of the British Isles. Vol. 1 Introduction and biology. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London. 219 pp.Google Scholar

Gilyarov, M.S. (Ed.). 1975. [A Key to the Soil-inhabiting Mites. Sarcoptiformes.] (In Russian.) Izdatel‘stvo “Nauka”, Moscow. 492 pp.Google Scholar

Gist, C.S. and Crossley, D.A. Jr. 1975. The litter arthropod community in a southern Appalachian hardwood forest: numbers, biomass and mineral element content. Am. Midl. Nat. 93: 107–122.Google Scholar

Grandjean, F. 1933. Etude sur le développement des Oribates. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 58: 30–61.Google Scholar

Grandjean, F. 1954. Essai de classification des Oribates (Acariens). Bull. Soc. Zool. France 78: 421–446.Google Scholar

Grandjean, F. 1969. Considérations sur le classement des Oribates. Leur division en 6 groupes majeurs. I. Les affinités de Collohmannia gigantea Selln. 1922. Acarologia 11: 127–153.Google Scholar

Hammer, M. 1952. Investigations on the microfauna of northern Canada. Part I. Oribatidae. Acta Arctica 4: 1–108.Google Scholar

Hammer, M. 1953. Collemboles and oribatids from the Thule District (North West Greenland) and Ellesmere Island (Canada). Meddr Grønland 136(5): 1–16.Google Scholar

Hartenstein, R. 1961. Soil Oribatei. I. Feeding specificity among forest soil Oribatei (Acarina). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55: 202–206.Google Scholar

Hill, S.B. 1978. Personal communication with E.E. Lindquist.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. and Lindquist., E.E. 1979. Evolution of phytophagous mites (Acari). A. Rev. Ent. 24: 21–158.Google Scholar

Luxton, M. 1972. Studies on the oribatid mites of a Danish beech wood soil. I. Nutritional biology. Pedobiologia 12: 434–463.Google Scholar

Marshall, V.G. 1968. Microarthropods from two Quebec woodland humus forms. III The Sarcoptiformes (Acarina). Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 13: 65–88.Google Scholar

Matthewman, W.G. and Pielou, D.P.. 1971. Arthropods in habiting the sporophores of Fomes fomentarius (Polyporaceae) in Gatineau Park, Quebec. Con. Ent. 103:775–847.Google Scholar

Mitchetl, M.J. 1976. Ceratozetes kananaskis (Acari: Cryptostigmata: Ceratozetidae): a new mite species from western Canada. Can. Ent. 108: 577–582.Google Scholar

Oswald, E.T. and Minty., L.W. 1971. Soil acarine fauna of southeastern Manitoba. II. Riparian communities. Maniloba Ent. 5: 71–78.Google Scholar

Rockett, C.L. and Woodring, J.P.. 1966 a. Oribatid mites as predators of soil nematodes. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 669–571.Google Scholar

Rockett, C.L. and Woodring, J.P.. 1966 b. Biological investigations on a new species of Ceratozetes and of Pergalumna (Acarina: Cryptostigmata). Acarologia 8: 511–520.Google Scholar

Rosický, B. 1973. Acarology and its practical importance. pp. 21–32in Daniel, M. and Rosický, B. (Eds.), Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Acarology. Junk, The Hague. 837 pp.Google Scholar

Sinha, R.N. and Wallace, H.A.H.. 1966. Association of granary mites and seedborne fungi in stored grain and in outdoor and indoor habitats. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 1170–1181.Google Scholar

Travé, J. 1963. Ecologie et biologie des oribates saxicoles et arboricoles. Vie et Milieu, Suppl. 14. 267 pp.Google Scholar

Travé, J. 1964. Importance des stases immatures des Oribates en systematique et en ecologie. Acarologia 6 (fasc. hors sér.) 47–53.Google Scholar

Wallwork, J.A. 1958. Notes on the feeding behaviour of some forest soil Acarina. Oikos 9: 260–271.Google Scholar

Wallwork, J.A. 1959. The distribution and dynamics of some forest soilrnites. Ecology 40: 557–563.Google Scholar

Wallwork, J.A. 1969. Some basic principles underlying the classification and identification of cryptostigmatid mites. pp. 155–168 in Sheals, J.G. (Ed.), The Soil Ecosystem. System. Ass. Publ. 8. xii + 247 pp.Google Scholar

Woodring, J.P. 1965. The biology of five new species of oribatids from Louisiana. Acarologia 1: 564–576.Google Scholar