Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:48:40.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some probability distributions connected with recording apparatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

C. Domb
Affiliation:
Pemproke CollegeCambridge

Extract

1. The problem to be discussed in the present paper arises when the finite resolving time of a recording apparatus is taken into account. Events are divided into two classes, recorded and unrecorded. Any recorded event is followed by a dead interval of a certain length of time, during which any other event which occurs will be unrecorded. A typical example is an α-particle counter; a recorded particle causes the chamber to ionize, and no other particle can be recorded until the chamber has deionized. In the case when the dead interval is of constant length τ, if the observation time t lies between (n − 1)τ and , the number of recorded events must be 0, 1, 2, …, n − 1 or n. We shall assume that the probability of an event occurring in the interval [t, t + dt] is λdt, λ being constant; this is the case of most practical interest. The probability distribution of recorded events for dead intervals of constant length has been determined by Ruark and Devol (2). The explicit expression of this distribution is fairly complicated, and it is therefore difficult to manipulate. The method employed in the present paper leads naturally to the Laplace transform of the distribution with respect to the time t, and this is relatively simple. The method can easily be generalized to deal with the case of dead intervals which are not all equal, but follow a probability distribution u(τ) . Finally the Laplace transform is very convenient for determining the asymptotic behaviour of the distribution of recorded events for large times of observation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Domb, C.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 43 (1947), 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ruark, A. and Devol, L.Phys. Rev. 49 (1936), 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)van der Pol, B.Phil. Mag. 8 (1929), 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Kosten, L.Physica, 10 (1943), 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar