Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:03:00.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical characteristics of a two-cylinder electrostatic lens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

L. S. Goddard
Affiliation:
St John's CollegeCambridge

Extract

In this paper formulae are developed for the first and second focal lengths, and the positions of the first and second principal planes of a type of electrostatic lens which has been the subject of study (mostly experimental) in several previous papers. The lens, which is commonly used in electron optical devices, lends itself to a theoretical study, although this does not appear to have been attempted before. It consists of two equal semi-infinite cylinders placed end to end so that their axes coincide and the ends are separated by a small gap. If the cylinders are at potentials V1 and V2 and we write σ = V2/V1, the system behaves as an electron lens when σ > 0 and as an electron mirror when σ < 0. In the latter case some experimental results have been given by Nicoll(1) who also studied the focusing action in the case σ > 0 and, in particular, the formation of intermediate images when σ ≪ 1 and when σ ≫ 1. But for the precise formulation of the relationship between σ and the number of cross-overs a theoretical study, based on the paraxial equation, would be necessary. The problem will be indicated below. An experimental determination of the lens characteristics for values of σ from about 2 to 15 and for several gap widths has been made by Spangenberg(2), whose results will be compared with those obtained in the present paper. The two-cylinder lens has also been studied by Klemperer and Wright(3) using an experimental and a numerical (trigonometrical) method, and some crude analytical results have been given by Gray(4).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Nicoll, F. H.Proc. Phys. Soc. 50 (1938), 888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Spangenberg, K.Elec. Commun. 21 (1943), 194.Google Scholar
(3)Klemperer, O. and Wright, W. D.Proc. Phys. Soc. 51 (1939), 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Gray, F.Bell Syst. Tech. J. 18 (1939), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Picht, J.Einführung in die Theorie der Elektronenoptik (Leipzig, 1939), p. 147.Google Scholar
(6)Bertram, S.Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs, N. Y., 28 (1940), 418.Google Scholar
(7)Whittaker, E. T. and Watson, G. N.Modern analysis (Cambridge, 1927).Google Scholar
(8)Picht, J.Ann. Phys., Leipzig, 15 (1932), 936.Google Scholar
(9)Glaser, W.Z. Phys. 117 (1941), 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Recknagel, A.Z. Phys. 104 (1937), 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Southwell, R. V.Relaxation methods in engineering science (Oxford, 1940). See also a series of papers in recent volumes of Proc. Roy. Soc.Google Scholar
(12)Shortley, G. H. and Weller, R.J. Appl. Phys. 9 (1938), 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Frocht, M. M. and Leven, M. M.J. Appl. Phys. 12 (1941), 596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Goddard, L. S.Proc. Phys. Soc. 56 (1944), 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar