Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:43:03.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dilogarithm identities after Bridgeman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2022

PRADTHANA JAIPONG
Affiliation:
Research Group in Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200. e-mail: pradthana.j@cmu.ac.th
MONG LUNG LANG
Affiliation:
Singapore. e-mail: lang2to46@gmail.com
SER PEOW TAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076. e-mails: mattansp@nus.edu.sg, asptan@gmail.com, e0174864@u.nus.edu
MING HONG TEE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076. e-mails: mattansp@nus.edu.sg, asptan@gmail.com, e0174864@u.nus.edu

Abstract

Following Bridgeman, we demonstrate several families of infinite dilogarithm identities associated with Fibonacci numbers, Lucas numbers, convergents of continued fractions of even periods, and terms arising from various recurrence relations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supported by Chiang Mai University.

Partially supported by the National University of Singapore academic research grant R-146-000-289-114.

§

The first and third author are grateful to the Temasek foundation for support.

References

Bridgeman, M.. Orthospectra of geodesic laminations and dilogarithm identities on moduli space, Geom. Topol. 15 (2011), 707733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, M.. Dilogarithm identities for solutions to Pell’s equation in terms of continued fraction convergents. arXiv : 1903.04074 [math.GT].Google Scholar
Bridgeman, M. and Kahn, J.. Hyperbolic volume of n-manifolds with geodesic boundary and orthospectra. Geom. Funct. Anal. 20(5) (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, M. and Tan, S.P.. Moments of the boundary hitting function for the geodesic flow on a hyperbolic manifold. Geom. Topol. 18 (2014), no. 1, 491520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirillov, A.N.. Dilogarithm identities. Quantum field theory, integrable models and beyond (Kyoto, 1994). Progr. Theoret. Phys. Suppl. No. 118 (1995), 61142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, L. Structural Properties of Polylogarithms, Math. Surveys Monogr. A.M.S., (Providence, RI, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, B., Tan, S.P. and Vo, A.D.. Hyperbolic jigsaws and families of pseudomodular groups, I. Geom. Topol. 22 (2018), no. 4, 23392366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, F. and Tan, S.P.. A dilogarithm identity on moduli spaces of curves. J. Differential Geom. 97 (2014), no. 2, 255274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShane, G.. Geometric identities. Kyoto University Research Information Repository 1836 (2013), 94103.Google Scholar
Richmond, B. and Szekeres, G.. Some formulas related to dilogarithms, the Zeta function and the Andrews-Gordon identities. J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A) 31 (1981), 362373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagier, D.. The Dilogarithm Function. Frontiers in number theory, physics and geometry, II. (Springer, Berlin, 2007), 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar