Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T07:20:41.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current effects in cylindrical superconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. D. Misener
A. D. Misener
Affiliation:
Physics LaboratoryRoyal FortBristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experiments are described which show the effect of current on the transition of cylindrical superconductors to the normal state produced by increasing an external magnetic field. The transition curves were determined with an accuracy of 0·1%. Both longitudinal and transverse fields were used.

The following results were found.

(a) Transverse field

(i) The field strength at which the first traces of resistance appeared was independent of current strength for reasonably small currents (up to about 100 mA. for 0·010 cm. wire).

(ii) With increase of current the transition curve at first changed shape, becoming more and more nearly linear, and then was displaced parallel to itself toward smaller values of the applied field by an amount in accordance with Silsbee's hypothesis.

(iii) The change in shape of the transition curve was accurately reproducible and was identical for specimens of the same material and diameter.

(iv) The results for specimens of different diameter could be accurately correlated if the measured values of the resistance were plotted against the current divided by the specimen diameter raised to the power (l + R/Rn), i.e. I/(diam.)(1+R/Rn), where R/Rn is the ratio of the measured resistance to the resistance just above the transition point.

(b) Longitudinal field

(i) With increase of current, however slight, the transition curve was displaced parallel to itself, toward smaller values of the applied field, without showing any change in shape.

(ii) The displacement of critical field for a given change of current was completely independent of the diameter of the specimen.

(iii) The observed shift to smaller fields was much greater than could be accounted for by the additional field produced by the current at the surface of the wire.

(iv) If we denote the (extrapolated) value of the critical field for zero current by (Hc) and the difference between this and the observed value for a current (I) by (ΔHc) then I and Hc are connected by the empirical relation

where A and n are constants depending on the nature of the superconducting metal.

when Hc is expressed in gauss and I in milliamperes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1939 , pp. 95 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)de Haas, W. J., Voogd, J. and Jonker, J. M.Physica, 1 (1934), 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Kapitza, P. and Milner, C. J.J. Sci. Instrum. 14 (1937), 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Misener, A. D.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 166 (1938), 43.Google Scholar
(4)Meissner, W., Franz, H. and Westerhoff, H.Ann. Phys., Lpz., (5), 13 (1932), 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Silsbee, F. B.J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 6 (1916), 597.Google Scholar
(6)Grayson-Smith, H.Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, iii, 31 (1937), 31.Google Scholar
(7)London, F.Physica, 3 (1936), 450.Google Scholar
(8)Mendelssohn, K.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 152 (1935), 34.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, K. and Moore, J. R.Phil. Mag. 21 (1936), 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Landau, L.Phys. Z. Sowjet. 11 (1937), 129; Nature, 141 (1938), 688.Google Scholar