Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-s5ss2 Total loading time: 0.201 Render date: 2021-03-05T17:37:02.743Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Article contents

Metric properties of some fractal sets and applications of inverse pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

EUGEN MIHAILESCU
EUGEN MIHAILESCU
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics “Simion Stoilow” of the Romanian Academy, P.O. Box 1-764, RO 014700, Bucharest, Romania. e-mail: Eugen.Mihailescu@imar.ro
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Eugen.Mihailescu@imar.ro
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider iterations of smooth non-invertible maps on manifolds of real dimension 4, which are hyperbolic, conformal on stable manifolds and finite-to-one on basic sets. The dynamics of non-invertible maps can be very different than the one of diffeomorphisms, as was shown for example in [4, 7, 12, 17, 19], etc. In [13] we introduced a notion of inverse topological pressure P− which can be used for estimates of the stable dimension δs(x) (i.e the Hausdorff dimension of the intersection between the local stable manifold Wsr(x) and the basic set Λ, x ∈ Λ). In [10] it is shown that the usual Bowen equation is not always true in the case of non-invertible maps. By using the notion of inverse pressure P−, we showed in [13] that δs(x) ≤ ts(ϵ), where ts(ϵ) is the unique zero of the function t → P−(tφs, ϵ), for φs(y):= log|Dfs(y)|, y ∈ Λ and ϵ > 0 small. In this paper we prove that if Λ is not a repellor, then ts(ϵ) < 2 for any ϵ > 0 small enough. In [11] we showed that a holomorphic s-hyperbolic map on 2 has a global unstable set with empty interior. Here we show in a more general setting than in [11], that the Hausdorff dimension of the global unstable set Wu() is strictly less than 4 under some technical derivative condition. In the non-invertible case we may have (infinitely) many unstable manifolds going through a point in Λ, and the number of preimages belonging to Λ may vary. In [17], Qian and Zhang studied the case of attractors for non-invertible maps and gave a condition for a basic set to be an attractor in terms of the pressure of the unstable potential. In our case the situation is different, since the local unstable manifolds may intersect both inside and outside Λ and they do not form a foliation like the stable manifolds. We prove here that the upper box dimension of Wsr(x) ∩ Λ is less than ts(ϵ) for any point x ∈ Λ. We give then an estimate of the Hausdorff dimension of Wu() by a different technique, using the Holder continuity of the unstable manifolds with respect to their prehistories.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 148 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 553 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

[1]Bedford, E. and Smillie, J.Polynomial diffeomorphisms of 2. Invent. Math. 103 (1991), 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bowen, R. Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Math. 470 (Springer 1973).Google Scholar
[3]Bowen, R.A horseshoe with positive measure. Invent. Math. 29, 203–204, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bothe, H. G.Shift spaces and attractors in noninvertible horseshoes. Fund. Math. 152 (1997), no. 3, 267–289.Google Scholar
[5]Fornaess, J. E and Sibony, N.Hyperbolic maps on 2. Math. Ann. 311 (1998), 305–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B.Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems Cambridge University Press (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Liu, P. D. Invariant measures satisfying an equality relating entropy, folding entropy and negative Lyapunov exponents. Comm. Math. Physics (2008).Google Scholar
[8]Manning, A. and McCluskey, H.Hausdorff dimension for horseshoes. Ergod. Th. and Dyn. Syst. 3 (1983), no. 2, 251–260.Google Scholar
[9]Mattila, P.Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidian Spaces (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Mihailescu, E. Applications of thermodynamic formalism in complex dynamics on 2. Discrete and Cont. Dyn. Syst. vol. 7, no. 4 (2001), 821–836.Google Scholar
[11]Mihailescu, E.The set K − for hyperbolic non-invertible maps. Ergodic Th. and Dyn. Syst. 22 (2002), 873–887.Google Scholar
[12]Mihailescu, E. and Urbanski, M.Estimates for the stable dimension for holomorphic maps. Houston J. Math. 31, no. 2 (2005), 367–389.Google Scholar
[13]Mihailescu, E. and Urbanski, M.Inverse topological pressure with applications to holomorphic dynamics of several complex variables. Comm. Contemp. Math. 6, no. 4 (2004), 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Mihailescu, E. and Urbanski, M. Inverse pressure estimates and the independence of stable dimension. Canad. J. Math. vol. 60, no. 3 (2008), 658–684.Google Scholar
[15]Mihailescu, E. and Urbanski, M. Transversal families of hyperbolic skew products. Discrete and Cont. Dyn. Syst. vol. 21, no. 3 (2008), 907–929.Google Scholar
[16]Nitecki, Z. and Przytycki, F.Preimage entropy for maps. Inter. J. Bifur. Class Appl. Sci. Engr. 9, (1999), no. 9, 1815–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Qian, M. and Zhang, Z. S. Ergodic theory for Axiom A endomorphisms. Ergodic Th. and Dyn. Syst. vol. 15, no. 1 (1995), 161–174.Google Scholar
[18]Ruelle, D.Elements of Differentiable Dynamics and Bifurcation Theory (Academic Press, 1989).Google Scholar
[19]Tsuji, M.Fat solenoidal attractors. Nonlinearity 14 (2001), 1011–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Walters, P.An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 5th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

11 Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Metric properties of some fractal sets and applications of inverse pressure
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Metric properties of some fractal sets and applications of inverse pressure
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Metric properties of some fractal sets and applications of inverse pressure
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *