Skip to main content Accessibility help

Resource Competition: A Bifurcation Theory Approach

  • B. W. Kooi (a1), P. S. Dutta (a2) (a3) and U. Feudel (a2)


We develop a framework for analysing the outcome of resource competition based on bifurcation theory. We elaborate our methodology by readdressing the problem of competition of two species for two resources in a chemostat environment. In the case of perfect-essential resources it has been extensively discussed using Tilman’s representation of resource quarter plane plots. Our mathematically rigorous analysis yields bifurcation diagrams with a striking similarity to Tilman’s method including the interpretation of the consumption vector and the resource supply vector. However, our approach is not restricted to a particular class of models but also works with other trophic interaction formulations. This is illustrated by the analysis of a model considering interactively-essential or complementary resources instead of prefect-essential resources. Additionally, our approach can also be used for other ecosystem compositions: multiple resources–multiple species communities with equilibrium or oscillatory dynamics. Hence, it gives not only a new interpretation of Tilman’s graphical approach, but it constitutes an extension of competition analyses to communities with many species as well as non-equilibrium dynamics.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
[1] A. Ajbar, K. Alhumaizi. Dynamics of the Chemostat: A Bifurcation Theory Approach. Boca Raton FL, Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, 2012.
[2] Baltzis, B.C., Fredrickson, A.G.. Limitation of growth rate by two complementary nutrients: Some elementary but neglected considerations. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 31 (1988), 7586.
[3] A. Cunningham, R.M. Nisbet. Transients and oscillations in continuous culture. In M.J. Bazin (ed), Mathematics in Microbiology, pages 77–103, London, Academic Press, 1983.
[4] Dhooge, A., Govaerts, W., Kuznetsov, Yu.A.. Matcont: A MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs. ACM T. Math. Software, 29 (2003), 141164.
[5] E.J. Doedel, B. Oldeman. Auto 07p: Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations. Technical report, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, 2009.
[6] G.F. Gause. The Struggle for Existence. Hafner Publishing, New York, 1969.
[7] Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G., Metz, J.A.J.. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol., 12 (1998), 3557.
[8] J.P. Grover. Resource Competition. Population and Community Biology series. Chapman & Hall, London, 1997.
[9] J. Guckenheimer, P. Holmes. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. volume 42 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2 edition, 1985.
[10] Hardin, G.. The competitive exclusion principle. Science, 131:3409 (1960), 12921297.
[11] Harpole, W.S., Ngai, J.T., Cleland, E.E., Seabloom, E.W., Borer, E.T., Bracken, M.E.S., Elser, J.J., Gruner, D.S., Hillebrand, H., Shurin, J.B., Smith, J.E.. Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol. Lett., 125 (2011), 852862.
[12] Hsu, S.-B., Cheng, K.-S., Hubbell, S.P.. Exploitative competition of microorganisms for two complementary nutrients in continuous cultures. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 41:3 (1981), 422444 .
[13] Huisman, J., Weissing, F.J.. Biological conditions for oscillations and chaos generated by multispecies competition. Ecology, 82:10 (2001), 26822695 .
[14] Hutchinson, G. E.. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat., 95:882 (1961), 137145.
[15] Kooi, B.W., Boer, M.P., Kooijman, S.A.L.M.. Resistance of a food chain to invasion by a top predator. Math. Biosci., 157 (1999), 217236.
[16] Kooi, B.W.. Numerical bifurcation analysis of ecosystems in a spatially homogeneous environment. Acta Biotheor., 51:3 (2003), 189-222.
[17] Kooi, B.W., Kuijper, L.D.J., Kooijman, S.A.L.M.. Consequence of symbiosis for food web dynamics. J. Math. Biol., 49:3 (2004), 227-271.
[18] S.A.L.M. Kooijman. Dynamic Energy Budget theory for metabolic organisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
[19] Kooijman, S.A.L.M., Dijkstra, H.A., Kooi, B.W.. Light-induced mass turnover in a mono-species community of mixotrophs. J. Theor. Biol., 214 (2002), 233254.
[20] Yu.A. Kuznetsov. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. volume 112 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 3 edition, 2004.
[21] Miller, T.E., Burns, J.H., Munguia, P., Walters, E.L., Kneitel, J.M., Richards, P. M., Mouquet, N., Buckley, H. L.. A critical review of Twenty Years’ use of the Resource-Ratio Theory. Am. Nat., 165:4 (2005), 439-448.
[22] Morton, R.D., Law, R., Pimm, S.L., Drake, J.A.. On models for assembling ecological communities. Oikos, 75:3 (1996), 493-499.
[23] Nattrass, S., Baigent, S., Murrell, D.J.. Quantifying the likelihood of co-existence for communities with asymmetric competition. B. Math. Biol., 74:10 (2012), 2315-2338.
[24] O’Neill, R.V., DeAngelis, D.L., Pastor, J.J., Jackson, B.J., Post, W.M.. Multiple nutrient limitations in ecological models. Ecol. Model., 46 (1989), 147163.
[25] Schipper, P., Verschoor, A.M., Vos, M., Mooij, W.M.. Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? Ecol. Lett., 4 (2001), 404407.
[26] Sperfeld, E., Martin-Creuzburg, D., Wacker, A.. Multiple resource limitation theory applied to herbivorous consumers: Liebig’s minimum rule vs. interactive co-limitation. Ecol. Lett., 15 (2012) 142150.
[27] H.L. Smith, P. Waltman. The Theory of the Chemostat. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[28] Troost, T.A., Kooi, B.W., Kooijman, S.A.L.M.. Bifurcation analysis can unify ecological and evolutionary aspects of ecosystems. Ecol. Model., 204 (2007), 253-268.
[29] Tilman, D.. Resource competition between planktonic algae: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology, 58 (1977), 338348.
[30] Tilman, D.. Resources: A graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am. Nat., 116 (1980), 363393.
[31] D. Tilman. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1982.
[32] Tilman, D.. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am. Nat., 125:6 (1985), 827-852.
[33] D. Tilman. Plant strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988.
[34] Wilson, J.B., Spijkerman, E., Huisman, J.. Is there really insufficient support for Tilman’s R* concept? A comment on Miller et al.. Am. Nat., 169:5 (2007), 700-706.


Resource Competition: A Bifurcation Theory Approach

  • B. W. Kooi (a1), P. S. Dutta (a2) (a3) and U. Feudel (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed