Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:22:28.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Marking of Chess-Players

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Extract

The purpose of this note is to suggest a system of marking chess-players that is both simple to apply and based on a theoretical background. The non-mathematical reader will not need to understand the formulae, but is recommended to read all the words.

In the British Chess Federation Year Book, 1953–4, pages 39–42, there is an article entitled “ A grading system for British players ”. It describes a system that it admits to be open to some objections. At first sight the system looks reasonable and is fairly simple to apply, though of course any system requires a fair amount of calculation if it is to be applied to hundreds of players. An objection to the system, mentioned in the article, is that it is always profitable to play an opponent whose mark exceeds one's own by more than 500 points, unless the system is modified in an inelegant manner. The publication of the article is stimulating to further thought and the system to be described here is one of the results. It is not open to an objection of the above form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Zermelo made a similar assumption in “Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximumproblem der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung”, Math. Zeit., 29 (1929), 436–60.