Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:56:12.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multinational Advantages of Chinese Business Groups: A Theoretical Exploration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Daphne W. Yiu*
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Abstract

Prior research on the internationalization of emerging market firms focused either on established incumbent firms or peripheral latecomer firms. However, an increase in outward foreign direct investment from emerging markets such as China has benefitted from a new organizational form – business groups. Given that new organizational forms pose fundamental challenges to existing theories on multinational enterprise, an examination of business group internationalization will bring the literature of multinational enterprise theories forward. Adopting an organizational approach, I propose that business groups, an organizational form that emerged to substitute market imperfections in China, constitute a micro-institutional environment for generating ownership, location, and internalization advantages, as well as for capitalizing on the linkage, leverage, and learning opportunities for internationalization. I posit that Chinese business groups facilitate such an internationalization process via their unique attributes including internal market, inward linkages, and institutional support. The article aims to provide a theoretical framework that generates insights for China's policy makers and managers, and to guide future research.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bae, K-H., Kang, J-K., & Kim, J-M. 2002. Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. Journal of Finance, 57(6): 26952740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisot, M., & Meyer, M. W. 2008. Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 349365.Google Scholar
Buckley, P. J., & Cassou, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise, Macmillan: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J.; Clegg, J., & Wang, C. 2004. The relationship between inward foreign direct investment and the performance of domestically-owned Chinese manufacturing industry. Multinational Business Review, 12(3): 2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, M., Shapiro, D., & Tang, Y. 2009. Business group performance in China: Ownership and temporal considerations. Management and Organization Review, 5(2): 167193.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E. 1971. International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38(149): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, R. E., & Uekusa, M. 1976. Industrial organization in Japan. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Chang, S. J., & Choi, U. 1988. Strategy, structure, and performance of Korean business groups: A transactions cost approach. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2): 141158.Google Scholar
Child, J. 2009. Context, comparison, and methodology in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 5773.Google Scholar
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension. Management and Organization Review 1(3): 381410.Google Scholar
China's Large Enterprise Business Groups (Zhongguo Da Qiye Jituan). 2003. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China's Large Enterprise Business Groups (Zhongguo Da Qiye Jituan). 2005. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China's Large Enterprise Business Groups (Zhongguo Da Qiye Jituan). 2006. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China's Large Enterprise Business Groups (Zhongguo Da Qiye Jituan). 2007. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China Statistical Yearbook, 2004. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China Statistical Yearbook, 2005. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China Statistical Yearbook. 2006. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
China Statistical Yearbook, 2007. Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
Collinson, S., & Rugman, A. M. 2007. The regional character of Asian multinational enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 429446.Google Scholar
Denrell, J., Fang, C., & Winter, S. G. 2003. The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 977990.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1980. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 931.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in the age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 461491.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1996. The geographical sources of competitiveness of firms: The results of a new survey. Transnational Corporations, 5(3): 130.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 2000. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 2004. Relational assets: The new competitive advantages of MNEs and countries. In Dunning, J. H. & Narula, R. (Eds.). Multinationals and industrial competitiveness: 201-241. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 2006. Comment on dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 139141.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4): 573593.Google Scholar
Erdener, C., & Shapiro, D. M. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese family enterprises and Dunning's eclectic MNE paradigm. Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 411436.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1994. Business groups. In Smelser, N.J. & Swedborg, R. (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology: 453475. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guillén, M. F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 362380.Google Scholar
Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kang, R. 2009. The internationalization process of Chinese multinationals. In Larcon, J-P. (Ed.), Chinese Multinationals: 77126. London: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
Keister, L. A. 1998. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China's transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2): 404440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keister, L. A. 2000. Chinese business groups: The structure and impact of interfirm relations during economic development. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 268285.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. & Palepu, K. 2006. Emerging giants: Building world-class companies in developing countries. Harvard Business Review, 84(10): 6069.Google Scholar
Lall, S. 1983. The new multinationals: The spread of Third World enterprises, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Leff, N. H. 1978. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(4): 661675.Google Scholar
Lu, J. W., & Ma, X. 2008. The contingent value of local partners' business group afiiliation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 295314.Google Scholar
Luo, X., & Chung, C. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. A dminis tra live Science Quarterly, 50(3): 404439.Google Scholar
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481498.Google Scholar
Makino, S., Lau, C. M., & Yeh, R. S. 2002. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 403421.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4): 467488.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2006a. Dragon multinationals: New players in the 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2006b. Response to Professors Dunning and Narula. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 153155.Google Scholar
Ministry of Commerce. 2004. Statistical Bulletin of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment 2003.Google Scholar
Ministry of Commerce. 2008. Statistical Bulletin of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment 2008. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce.Google Scholar
Narula, R. 2006. Globalization, new ecologies, new zoologies, and the purported death of the eclectic paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 143151.Google Scholar
Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global business revolution. New York: Palegrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, A. M., & Li, J. 2007. Will China's multinationals succeed globally or regionally? European Journal of Management, 25(5): 333343.Google Scholar
Rui, R., & Yip, G. S. 2008. Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2): 213226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvant, K. P. 2008. The rise of TNCs from emerging markets: The issues. In Sauvant, K. P., Mendoza, K. & Ince, I. (Eds.), The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: 314. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Stark, D. 1996. Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4): 9931027.Google Scholar
Sutherland, D. 2009. Do China's ‘national team’ business groups undertake strategic-asset-seeking OFDI? Chinese Management Studies, 3(1): 1124.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. E., Eden, L., & Hitt, M. A. 2002. Who goes abroad? International diversification by emerging market firms into developed markets. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting at Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009, An Examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 2955.Google Scholar
White, R. E., Hoskisson, R. E., Yiu, D. W., & Bruton, G. B. 2008. Employment and market innovation in Chinese business group affiliated firms: The role of group control systems. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 225256.Google Scholar
Yiu, W., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. 2005. Understanding business group Performance in an emerging Economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 183206.Google Scholar
Yiu, D. W., Lau, C. M., Bruton, G. D. 2007a. International venturing by emerging economy firms: The e fleets of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 519540.Google Scholar
Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2007b. Business groups: An integrated model to foe LIS future rese arch. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8): 15511579.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., & Keh, H. T. 2010. Interorganizational exchanges in China: Organizational forms and governance mechanisms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 123147.Google Scholar