Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-n9d2k Total loading time: 0.232 Render date: 2021-10-16T18:46:11.826Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Fungal composition of lichen thalli assessed by single strand conformation polymorphism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Lucia MUGGIA
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria. Email: lucia_muggia@hotmail.com Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 3, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Martin GRUBE
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria. Email: lucia_muggia@hotmail.com

Abstract

Fungi that are unrelated to the mycobiont species frequently colonize lichens. Some of these fungal colonists are described lichenicolous fungi, lichen parasites and pathogens that produce recognizable morphological characters, while others apparently produce no noticeable structures. Here we apply the single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique to directly assess the abundance of different fungi in lichens. Twenty-eight lichen thalli were chosen, some with and some without externally visible symptoms of parasite infection, and these were subjected to total DNA extraction. PCR was conducted with fungal-specific primers for the ITS region of ribosomal DNA. Single strands of the products were separated on native acrylamide gels. The majority of lichen specimens, both infected and those without symptoms, displayed more than one band in the stained gels. In one case, 14 bands were detected using SSCP. Some of these bands apparently represent other neighbouring lichens in the habitat, but many are apparently non-lichen-forming. Since few lichen-associated fungi have been cultured and sequenced, it is difficult to know if SSCP bands represent obligate lichenicolous fungi, other asymptomatic lichen parasites, or fungi not obligately associated with lichens, but our results indicate that large numbers of non-lichen-forming fungi commonly co-occur with lichens in nature. For specimens of the filamentous lichens Cystocoleus ebeneus and Racodium rupestre we used cloned sequences to compare the number of sequences obtained by the SSCP method to the number obtained by direct sequencing of thallus extracts, and we generally found that more sequences could be detected by SSCP than could be seen by direct sequencing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 33893402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, I. C. & Cairney, J. W. G. (2004) Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. Environmental Microbiology 6: 769779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, A. E., Miądlikowska, J., Higgins, K. L., Sarvate, S. D., Gugger, P., Way, A., Hofstetter, V., Kauff, K. & Lutzoni, F. (2009) A phylogenetic estimation of trophic transition networks for ascomycetous fungi: are lichens cradles of symbiotrophic fungal diversification? Systematic Biology 58: 283297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crittenden, P. D., David, J. C., Hawksworth, D. L. & Campbell, F. S. (1995) Attempted isolation and success in the culturing of a broad spectrum of lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi. New Phytologist 130: 267297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubero, O. F., Crespo, A., Fatehi, J. & Bridge, P. D. (1999) DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium stored and lichenized fungi. Plant Systematics and Evolution 217: 243249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, S. (1999) PCR optimization and troubleshooting, with special reference to the amplification of ribosomal DNA in lichenized fungi. Lichenologist 31: 517531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes. Application for the identification of mycorrhizae and rust. Molecular Ecology 2: 113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girlanda, M., Isocrono, D., Bainco, C. & Luppi-Mosca, A. M. (1997) Two foliose lichens as microfungal ecological niches. Mycologia 89: 531536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. A. (1999) BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symposium Series 41: 9598.Google Scholar
Harutyunyan, S., Muggia, L. & Grube, M. (2008) Black fungi in lichens from seasonally arid habitats. Studies in Mycology 61: 8390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawksworth, D. L. & Honegger, R. (1994) The lichen thallus: a symbiotic phenotype of nutritionally specialized fungi and its response to gall producer. In Plant Galls: Organisms, Interactions, Populations. (Williams, M. A. I., ed.): 7798. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.Google Scholar
Lawrey, J. D. (1993) Chemical ecology of Hobsonia christiansenii, a lichenicolous hyphomycete. American Journal of Botany 80: 11091113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrey, J. D. & Diederich, P. (2003) Lichenicolous fungi: interactions, evolution, and biodiversity. Bryologist 106: 80120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. I. & Zuccaro, A. (2006) Sequences, the environment and fungi. Mycologist 20: 6274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muggia, L., Hafellner, J., Wirtz, N., Hawksworth, D. L. & Grube, M. (2008) The sterile microfilamentous lichenized fungi Cystocoleus ebeneus and Racodium rupestre are relatives of plant pathogens and clinically important dothidealean fungi. Mycological Reserach 112: 5056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orita, M., Iwahan, H., Kanazawa, H., Hayashi, K. & Sekiya, T. (1989) Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86: 27662770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, R. D. M. (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12: 357358.Google ScholarPubMed
Petrini, O., Hakem, U. & Dreyfuss, M. M. (1990) An analysis of fungal communities isolated from fruticose lichens. Mycologia 82: 444451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. (1998) Modeltest – testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prillinger, H., Kraepelin, G., Lopandic, K., Schweigkofler, W., Molnar, O., Weigang, F. & Dreyfuss, M. M. (1997) New species of Fellomyces isolated from epiphytic lichen species. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 20: 572574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, R. S., Dunigan, D. D. & Rodriguez, R. J. (2001) Fungal symbiosis: from mutualism to parasitism, who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytologist, 151: 705716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J. L., Marin, A. & Medina, J. R. (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & van der Mark, P. (2005) MrBayes 3.1 Manual, http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/mb3.1_manual.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruibal, C., Platas, G. & Billis, G. F. (2005) Isolation and characterization of melanized fungi from limestone formations in Mallorca. Mycological Progress 4: 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, K. A. (2009) Progress towards DNA barcoding of fungi. Molecular Ecology Resources 9 (suppl. 1): 8389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sikaroodi, M., Lawrey, J. D., Hawksworth, D. L. & DePriest, P. (2001) The phylogenetic position of selected lichenicolous fungi: Hobsonia, Illosporium, and Marchandiomyces. Mycological Research 105: 453460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torzilli, A. P., Balakrishna, S., O'Donnell, K. & Lawrey, J. D. (2002) The degradative activity of a lichenicolous Fusarium sp. compared to related entomogenous species. Mycological Research 106: 12041210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal DNA genes for phylogenies. In PCR Protocols, a Guide to Methods and Applications. (Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Snisky, J. J., & White, T. J., eds): 315322. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wolinski, H., Grube, M. & Blanz, P. (1999) Direct PCR of symbiotic fungi using microslides. Biotechniques 26: 454455.Google ScholarPubMed
11
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Fungal composition of lichen thalli assessed by single strand conformation polymorphism
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Fungal composition of lichen thalli assessed by single strand conformation polymorphism
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Fungal composition of lichen thalli assessed by single strand conformation polymorphism
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *