Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Leiden Journal of International Law
  4. Volume 26
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 26 - December 2013

Contents

Page 4 of 4

BOOK REVIEWS

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • LJL volume 26 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2013, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

REVIEW ESSAY

  • Kelsen, Legal Normativity, and Formal Justice in International Relations

  • JOSHUA PAINE
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 November 2013, pp. 1037-1053

  • Hans Kelsen's vast body of work is perhaps one of the best examples of the unremarkable but important point that one's legal theory and methodological choices are intricately tied up with how one understands international law. Kelsen stands for a huge number of different positions, but chief amongst them must be his insistence on developing a ‘pure’ theory of law that accounted for the unique normativity of law, separate from empirical facts and causality on the one hand, and substantive theories of justice on the other. For Kelsen, the unique normativity of law is found within the legal system itself, in the idea of normative imputation – the ‘linking of a conditioning material fact with a conditioned consequence’. According to Kelsen, this specifically legal sense of ‘ought’ is an a priori category that allows us to correctly cognize the legal meaning of empirical data.

Back Cover (IBC, OBC) and matter

  • LJL volume 26 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2013, pp. b1-b6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

BOOK REVIEWS

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • LJL volume 26 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 May 2013, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • LJL volume 26 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    31 July 2013, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

BOOK REVIEWS

Back Cover (IBC, OBC) and matter

  • LJL volume 26 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    31 July 2013, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • LJL volume 26 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 May 2013, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • LJL volume 26 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 November 2013, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back Cover (IBC, OBC) and matter

  • LJL volume 26 issue 4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 November 2013, pp. b1-b8
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 4 of 4