Most cited
This page lists all time most cited articles for this title. Please use the publication date filters on the left if you would like to restrict this list to recently published content, for example to articles published in the last three years. The number of times each article was cited is displayed to the right of its title and can be clicked to access a list of all titles this article has been cited by.
- Cited by 7
The Legal Regulation of Religious Groups
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 16 February 2009, pp. 33-62
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
NEW DIRECTIONS IN LEGAL EXPRESSIVISM
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 April 2017, pp. 1-21
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
THE CONTENT-INDEPENDENCE OF POLITICAL OBLIGATION: WHAT IT IS AND HOW TO TEST IT
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 16 August 2018, pp. 135-157
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
THE EMOTIONAL DEPRAVITY OF PSYCHOPATHS AND CULPABILITY
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2003, pp. 63-82
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
CONSTRAINTS ON THE CRITERIA OF LEGALITY
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 February 2001, pp. 171-183
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
THE PRIMACY OF JUSTICE
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 30 April 2004, pp. 269-294
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
HOW TO JUSTIFY MANDATORY ELECTORAL QUOTAS: A POLITICAL EGALITARIAN APPROACH
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 16 December 2021, pp. 285-315
-
- Article
-
- You have access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
Why Omissions are Special
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 13 February 2009, pp. 311-335
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
ACTION AND AGENCY IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 March 2009, pp. 1-23
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
Why Feminist Epistemology Isn't (And the Implications for Feminist Jurisprudence)
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 13 February 2009, pp. 365-400
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
CONFLICTS OF RIGHTS:: Typology, Methodology, and Nonconsequentialism
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 03 April 2002, pp. 239-255
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 7
INTENTIONS, COMPLIANCE, AND FIDUCIARY OBLIGATIONS*
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 11 July 2014, pp. 106-132
-
- Article
-
- You have access
- HTML
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
RULES, RIGHTS, OPTIONS, AND TIME
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 May 2001, pp. 391-404
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
Voluntary Obligations and the Scope of the Law of Contract
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 16 February 2009, pp. 325-357
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
IN DEFENSE OF CONTENT-INDEPENDENCE
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 08 November 2017, pp. 143-167
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
CASTING THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF OPPOSITION ONTO HOHFELD'S FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTS
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 25 June 2021, pp. 2-35
-
- Article
-
- You have access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
Irrational Expectations
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 16 February 2009, pp. 227-248
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
A CONDITIONAL INTENT TO PERFORM
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 June 2009, pp. 107-147
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT LEGAL CONVENTIONALISM?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 June 2008, pp. 135-166
-
- Article
- Export citation
- Cited by 6
ON HART'S CATEGORY MISTAKE
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 February 2014, pp. 347-369
-
- Article
- Export citation