Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:49:03.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Versions of Academic Freedom, by Stanley Fish. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014, xiii + 163pp ($24 cloth). ISBN: 97800226064314.

Review products

Versions of Academic Freedom, by Stanley Fish. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014, xiii + 163pp ($24 cloth). ISBN: 97800226064314.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ole W Pedersen*
Affiliation:
Newcastle Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Silver, DJThe higher gamesmanship – there's no such thing as free speech’ (1994) 58 Commentary 59–61 at 61.Google Scholar

2. MacFarquhar, LThe dean's list’ (2001) The New Yorker 11 June, 6271 at 62.Google Scholar

3. The Clarendon Lectures form the basis of his Professional Correctness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

4. Cunningham, VBook review: Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change ’ (1995) 8(382) New Statesman & Society.Google Scholar

5. Lodge, D Trilogy (London: Penguin, 1993) pp 270-245.Google Scholar

6. Eagleton, TThe estate agent: Stanley Fish and his trouble with principles’ in Olson, GA and Worsham, L Postmodern Sophistry (New York: State University of New York Press, 2004) pp 181188 at 188.Google Scholar

7. The Fugitive in Flight (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010).Google Scholar

8. How to Write a Sentence: And How to Read One (New York: HarperCollins, 2011).Google Scholar

9. Fish, S Versions of Academic Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014) pp 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Ibid, p x.

11. See eg Farrington, DJ and Palfreyman, D The Law of Higher Education (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) pp 371385.Google Scholar

12. See eg s 32(2) of the Higher Education Act 2004, s 26 of the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Act 2005, s 202 of the Higher Education Act 1988 and Art 13 of the Charter for Fundamental Rights.

13. See s 6 of the Defamation Act 2013.

14. See Urofsky v Gilmore 216 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2000), in which the Fourth Circuit upheld a law preventing state employees in Virginia from accessing explicit sexual materials on state-owned Pcs without authorisation from a superior.

15. Menand, LThe limits of academic freedom’ in Menand, L (ed) The Future of Academic Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996) pp 320.Google Scholar

16. Docherty, THostile takeoverTimes Higher Education Supplement 4 December 2014.Google Scholar See also D Matthews ‘Thomas Docherty to face insubordination charge in tribunal’ Times Higher Education Supplement, 24 July 2014; available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/thomas-docherty-to-face-insubordination-charge-in-tribunal/2014711.article (accessed 14 January 2015).

17. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/22/oxford-university-academic-shard-jail-place-hacker-garrett (accessed 14 January 2015)..‘Oxford University academic who scaled Shard is spared jail sentence’ The Guardian 22 May 2014; available at

18. Fish, S Save the World on Your Own Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. Ibid, pp 12–13.

20. Ibid, p 20.

21. Ibid, p 30.

22. Fish, above n 9, pp 34–35.

23. See eg Chomsky, NThe responsibility of intellectualsNew York Review of Books 2 February 1967;Google Scholar and Rorty, R Achieving our Country (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

24. Rorty, RDoes academic freedom have philosophical presuppositions?’ in Menand, above n 15, pp 2142.Google Scholar

25. Fish, above n 9, p 132.

26. Ibid, p 134.

27. Ibid, p 130.

28. Fish, above n 3, p 2.

29. Rorty likewise agrees when he argues that ‘accumulated experience has taught us […] that universities are unlikely to remain healthy and free once people outside the universities take a hand in redrawing [its] line[s]’; above n 24, p 28.

30. See in particular Collini, S What Are Universities For? (London: Penguin, 2012);Google Scholar as well as the useful overview found in Collier, RPrivatizing the university and the new political economy of socio-legal studies: remaking the (legal) academic subject’ (2014) 40 J L Soc'y 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31. See eg Bradley, A Conversations, Choices and Chances: The Liberal Law School in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar

32. Fish, above n 18, p 67.

33. Ibid.

34. Conford, FMMicrocosmographia academica: being a guide for the young academic politician’ (1908); available at https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/iau/cornford/cornford.html (accessed 14 January 2015) at 4.Google Scholar

35. Fish was dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago from 1999 to 2004, and before that chairman of the English department at Duke University. At Duke, Fish's tenure has, however, varyingly been described as transforming the department into ‘the professional powerhouse of the day’ and for resting on the ‘hiring [of] celebrity couples’. See D Yaffe ‘The department that fell to earth: the deflation of Duke English’ (1999) 9(1) Lingua Franca: the Review of Academic Life 24–31; and ‘The indefensible Stanley Fish’ Slate Magazine 27 December 1999; available at http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/culturebox/1999/12/the_indefensible_stanley_fish.single.html (accessed 14 January 2015).

36. See ‘No bias, no merit: the case against blind submission’ in Doing What Comes Naturally (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989) pp 164179 at 175.Google Scholar

37. Fish, SDeep in the heart of TexasNew York times Opinionator, 21 June 2010; available at http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/21/deep-in-the-heart-of-texas/?_r=0 (accessed 14 January 2015).Google Scholar

38. See eg Fish, SLiberalism doesn't exist’ in There's No Such Thing as Free Speech (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994) pp 134138.Google Scholar

39. Ibid, p 135. See also Fish, SMission impossible’ in Fish, S The Trouble with Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999) pp 162186.Google Scholar

40. Ibid, p 136.

41. Fish, above n 39, p 180.

42. Ibid, p 168, anglicised.

43. For a particularly enlightening example, see Kahan, DM and Braman, DCultural cognition and public policy’ (2006) 24 Yale L & Pol'y Rev 147.Google Scholar

44. Foucault, MThe concern for truth’ in Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Kritzman, LD (New York: Routledge, 1988) p 265.Google Scholar

45. Posner, RA Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003) p 35.Google Scholar

46. Fish, SThe unbearable ugliness of Volvos’ in Fish, above n 38, pp 273279 at 276.Google Scholar