Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:21:17.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Elizabeth Heger Boyle  and
Sharon E. Preves
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Looking at power struggles primarily within national boundaries reifies the nation-state and misses larger issues of control in the international system. Using the example of female genital cutting (FGC), we consider the relative importance of local constituencies versus international normative influence in creating national policies. We find that the occurrence of anti-FGC legislation in countries where many individuals support the procedure, the timing and character of national legal action directed against FGC, and the uniformity of political action all lend weight to the importance of international norms. At the national level, we find (1) reform is often a top-down process in which national laws are developed to change rather than reflect local attitudes, and (2) African states tend to work around local communities by adopting bureaucratic policies to combat FGC (Western countries, in contrast, tend to adopt formal laws). At the international level, our findings suggest (1) the structural position of international actors influences whether they deploy assimilative or coercive reform strategies, (2) contradictions among international ideals limits Western hegemony, and (3) international ideals can simultaneously empower (by offering options) and disempower (by disengaging states from local constituencies) local individuals.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , 2000 , pp. 703 - 737
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Footnotes

Special thanks to Marci Hoffman, who created our original bibliography, and Angela Heffernan, who provided detailed background information. For helpful comments, our appreciation also goes out to several anonymous reviewers, and to Nitza Berkovitch, John Boli, Jeff Broadbent, Pamela Feldman-Savelsberg, David Frank, Mayra Gómez, Doug Hartmann, Susan Hirsch, Andrea Hoeschen, Sally Kenney, Ross Macmillan, John W. Meyer, Layli Miller-Bashir, Jeylan Mortimer, Cynthia Myntti, Jennifer Pierce, Francisco Ramirez, Joachim Savelsberg, Perry Seymour, and Kathry Sikkink. This project was funded through grants from the Life Course Center and the McKnight Summer Fellowship Program, both at the University of Minesota.

References

References

Agence France Presse (1994) “Barber Arrested After CNN Films Female Circumcision,” 12 Sept.Google Scholar
Agence France Presse (1996) “Egypt's First Lady to Combat Female Circumcision,” 20 Dec.Google Scholar
A'Haleem, Asma Mohammed (1992) “Claiming Our Bodies and Our Rights: Exploring Female Circumcision as an Act of Violence in Africa,” in Schuler, M., ed., Freedom from Violence: Women's Strategies from Around the World. New York: Women, Law and Development: OEF International.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ellen (1994) “Legislating Cultural Change: Female Genital Mutilation in Minnesota,” The Hennepin Lawyer 16–9 (Sept.-Oct.).Google Scholar
An-Na'im, Abdullahi (1990) Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Assaad, Marie Bassilli (1980) “Female Circumcision in Egypt: Social Implications, Current Research, and Prospects for Change,” 11 Studies in Family Planning 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker-Benfield, Graham J. (1976) “A Historical Perspective on Women's Health Care—Female Circumcision,” 1 Women & Health 13–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Bashir, Layli Miller (1996) “Female Genital Mutilation in the United States: An Examination of Criminal and Asylum Law,” 4 American University J. of Gender & the Law 415–54.Google Scholar
Berkovitch, Nitza, & Bradley, Karen (1999) “The Globalization of Women's Status: Consensus/Dissensus in the World Polity.” 42 Sociological Perspectives 481–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibbings, Lois. S. (1995) “Female Circumcision: Mutilation or Modification?” in Bridgeman, J. & Millns, S., eds., Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body. Aldershot, Hampshire, United Kingdom: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Black, J. A., & Debelle, G. D. (1995) “Female Genital Mutilation in Britain,” 310 British Medical J. 1590–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boddy, Janice (1991) “Body Politics: Continuing the Anti-Circumcision Crusade,” 5 Medical Anthropology Quart. 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli, John, & Thomas, George (1997) “World Culture in the World Polity,” 62 American Sociological Rev. 171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulware-Miller, Kay (1985) “Female Circumcision: Challenges to the Practice as a Human Rights Violation,” 8 Harvard Women's Law J. 155–77.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger (1998) “Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, & Meyer, John (1998) “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law,” 49 Soziale Welt 213–32.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, McMorris, Barbara & Gómez, Mayra (2000) “Normative Pressure and Change in African Women's Opinions Toward Female Genital Cutting.” Working paper, Life Course Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Brennan, Katherine (1989) “The Influence of Cultural Relativism on International Human Rights Law: Female Circumcision as a Case Study,” 7 Law and Inequality 367–98.Google Scholar
Brown, Nathan (1995) “Law and Imperialism: Egypt in Comparative Perspective,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Ruth (1997) “Constructing Virtual Justice in the Global Arena,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth (1945) A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
California State Senate (1997) “The California Bill Text Statenet: California 1995-96 Regular Session Assembly Bill 2125,” World Wide Web: http://www.sen.ca.gov:81/archives/bill/prior/AB/FROM2100/AB2125/AACHEALT.TXT.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas (1998) “The Rule of Law Revival,” 7 Foreign Affairs 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Dara (1997) Female Genital Cutting: Findings from the Demographic and Health Surveys Program. Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
Chase, Cheryl (1998) “Hermaphrodites with Attitude: Mapping the Emergence of Intersex Political Activism,” 4 GLQ: A J. of Lesbian and Gay Studies 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Doriane Lambelet (1998) “The Seattle Compromise: Multicultural Sensitivity and Americanization,” 47 Duke Law J. 717–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Record (1995a) “Introduction of Legislation to Prevent Female Genital Mutilation and the Dangers of the National Security Revitalization Act,” 14 Feb., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Congressional Record (1995b) “Legislation Making FGM Illegal,” 19 Oct., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Congressional Record (1996) “Immigration Control Responsibility Act of 1996,” 29 Apr., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary (1978) Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Dawit, Seble, & Mekuria, Salem (1993) “The West Just Doesn't Get It,” New York Times, 7 Dec, p. A27.Google Scholar
Deutsch Presse-Agentur (1994) “American TV Crew Questioned on Film on Female Circumcision,” 12 Sept.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (1989) Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dugger, Celia W. (1996) “New Law Bans Genital Cutting in United States: Violators Could Face Five Years in Prison,” New York Times, 12 Oct., p. 1A.Google Scholar
Dullea, Georgia (1980) “Female Circumcision a Topic at UN Parley,” New York Times, 18 July, p. B4.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren, & Suchman, Mark (1997) “The Legal Environments of Organizations,” 23 Annual Rev. of Sociology 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren, Uggen, Christopher & Erlanger, Howard (1999) “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth,” 105 American J. of Sociology 406–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
El Dareer, Asma (1982) Woman, Why Do You Weep? London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
El Katsha, Samiha, Ibrahim, Sherine & Sedky, Noha (1997) “Experiences of Nongovernmental Organizations Working Towards the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation in Egypt,” Female Genital Mutilation Task Force, Nov.Google Scholar
Etienne, Margareth (1995) “Addressing Gender-Based Violence in an International Context,” 18 Harvard Women's Law J. 139–70.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (1996) National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, David J., & McEneaney, Elizabeth H. (1999) “The Individualization of Society and the Liberalization of State Policies on Same-Sex Sexual Relations, 1984–1995,” 77 Social Forces 911–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, Roger, & Alford, Robert (1991) “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions,” in Powell, W. & DiMaggio, P., eds., The New Institutionalism in Institutional Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gauch, Susan (1996) “In Egypt, Movement to Ban Ancient Practice Expands,” Christian Science Monitor, 19 Dec., p. 7.Google Scholar
Golub, Stephen (1993) “Assessing and Enhancing the Impact of Democratic Development Projects: A Practitioner's Perspective,” 28 Studies in Comparative International Development 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grattet, Ryken, Jenness, Valerie & Curry, Theodore (1998) “Innovation and Diffusion in U.S. Hate Crime Law,” 63 American Sociological Rev. 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenbaum, Ellen (1991) “The Islamic Movement, Development, and Health Education: Recent Changes in the Health of Rural Women in Central Sudan,” 33 Social Science Medical 637–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunning, Isabelle (1990-1991) “Arrogant Perception, World-Travelling and Multicultural Feminism: The Case of Female Genital Surgeries,” 23 Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 189–248.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1963) Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1986) Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement, 2d Ed. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hosken, Fran (1981) “Female Genital Mutilation in the World Today: A Global Review,” 11 International J. of Health Services 415–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, Karen (1995) “The Criminalization of Female Genital Mutilation in the United States,” 4 J. of Law & Policy 321–70.Google Scholar
Ierodiaconou, Mary-Jane (1995) “‘Listen to Us!‘ Female Genital Mutilation, Feminism, and the Law in Australia,” 20 Melbourne Univ. Law Rev. 562–87.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. & Rosberg, Carl G. (1982) “Why Africa's Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood,” 35 World Politics 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Mary Ann (1994) “Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation: The Female Genital Mutilation Act of 1993, H.R. 3247,” 9 Berkeley Women's Law J. 206.Google Scholar
Kassindja, Fauziya, & Bashir, Layli Miller. 1998. Do They Hear You When You Cry? New York: Delta.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists Without Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kenyatta, Jomo (1962) Facing Mount Kenya: The Tribal Life of the Gikuyu. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kidder, Robert (1984) Connecting Law & Society: An Introduction to Research and Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kouba, Leonard J. & Huasher, Judith (1985) “Female Circumcision in Africa: An Overview,” 28 African Studies Review 9–110.Google Scholar
Lancaster, John (1995) “Top Islamic University Gains Influence in Cairo; Al Azhar Reflects Revival of Fundamentalism,” Washington Post, 11 Apr., p. A14.Google Scholar
Lancaster, John (1997) “Egypt to Enforce Circumcision Ban; Health Minister Decries Practice on Females: Challenges Court Ruling,” Washington Post, 12 July, p. A17.Google Scholar
Lane, Sandra, & Rubinstein, Robert (1996) “Judging the Other: Responding to Traditional Female Genital Surgeries,” 26 Hastings Center Report 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightfoot-Klein, Hanny (1989) Prisoners of Ritual: An Odyssey into Female Genital Circumcision in Africa. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry (1996) “Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account,” 61 American Sociological Rev. 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood (1996) Citizen and Subjects: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Judy (1995) “A Welcome Reversal,” Washington Post 27 Dec, p. F13.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh, & Angell, Dwight (1993) “House Bill Would Outlaw Female Genital Mutilation,” Detroit News, 28 Nov., p. 1C.Google Scholar
McNeely, Connie (1995) Constructing the Nation-State: International Organization and Prescriptive Action. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1995) “Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Helen Chapin (1990) Egypt: A Country Study. Federal Research Division. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Ramirez, Francisco, Boli, John & Thomas, George (1997) “World Society and the Nation-State,” 103 American J. of Sociology 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., Frank, David John, Hironaka, Ann & Schofer, Evan (1997) “The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990,” 51 International Organization 623–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Jocelyn Margaret (1974) The Kikuyu Female Circumcision Controversy, with Special Reference to the Church Missionary Society's Sphere of Influence. Ph.D. diss., Department of History, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Murray, Jocelyn Margaret (1976) “Church Missionary Society and the Female Circumcision Issue in Kenya, 1929–32,” 8 Journal of Religion in Africa 92.Google Scholar
Obermeyer, Carla Makhlouf (1999) “Female Genital Surgeries: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable,” 13 Medical Anthropology Quart. 79–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obiora, L. Amede (1997) “Bridges and Barricades: Rethinking Polemics and Intransigence in the Campaign Against Female Circumcision,” 47 Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 275–377.Google Scholar
Office of Refugee Resettlement (1997) Refugee Resettlement Program, Fiscal Year 1995, Report to Congress (AIS 4594-1), Table 5.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas (1995) “Invention of the Common Good,” in Lyons, G. & Mastanduno, M., eds., Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Preves, Sharon E. (1998) “For the Sake of the Children: Destigmatizing Inter-sexuality,” 9 J. of Clinical Ethics 411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preves, Sharon E. (1999) “Sexing the Intersexed: Lived Experiences in Socio-Cultural Context.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco, Soysal, Yasemin & Shanahan, Suzanne (1997) “Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights,” 62 American Sociological Rev. 735–45.Google Scholar
Reuters World Service (1995) “Egypt Says Female Circumcision in Decline,” 4 Apr.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia, Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, Kuipers, Kathy & Robinson, Dawn (1998) “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience,” 63 American Sociological Rev. 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard (1993) “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” 47 International Organization 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. (1997) “‘Let Them Eat Cake’: Globalization, Postmodern Colonialism, and the Possibilities of Justice,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jaqueline (1995) Visions and Discussions on Genital Mutilation of Girls: An International Survey. Amsterdam: Defence for Children International.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Post-National Members in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride (1995) “Human Rights for Women: International Compliance with a Feminist Standard,” 15 Women & Politics 71–95.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur (1968) Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Sussman, Erika (1998) “Contending with Culture: An Analysis of the Female Genital Mutilation Act of 1996,” 31 Cornell International Law J. 101–56.Google Scholar
Thomas, George, & Meyer, John W. (1984) “The Expansion of the State,” 10 Annual Rev. of Sociology 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toubia, Nahid (1995) A Call for Global Action. New York: RAINBO.Google Scholar
Toubia, Nahid & Izett, S. (1998) Female Genital Mutilation: An Overview. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan (1993) “Outline of a Theory of Human Rights,” 27 Sociology 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (1997) “Declarations, Reservations, Objections, and Notifications of Withdrawal of Reservations Relating to the CEDAW,” World Wide Web: gopher://gopher.un.org:70/00/ga/cedaw/CEDAWSP2.EN.Google Scholar
United Nations Population Fund (1996) Report of the Technical Consultation on Female Genital Mutilation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 27-29 Mar.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (1995) 1995 Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State (1998) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1997: Africa. World Wide Web: http://www.state.gov/www/global/human.rights/1997_hrp_report/97hrp_report_africa.html. (30 Jan.).Google Scholar
Walker, Alice (1992) Possessing the Secret of Joy. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Walker, Alice, & Parmar, Pratibha (1993) Warrior Marks: Female Genital Mutilation and the Sexual Blinding of Women. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Warren, Priscilla (1994) “Women and Human: Gender-Based Persecution Is a Human Rights Violation Against Women,” 5 Hastings Women's Law J. 281–315.Google Scholar
Warzazi, Halima Embarek (1991) Study on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, Final Report by the Special Rapporteur. UN Commission on Human Rights, Sub-commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1991/6 (5 July).Google Scholar
Weiss, Edith Brown (1989) “Legal Dimensions of Global Change: A Proposed Research Agenda,” 121 International Social Science J. 399–412.Google Scholar
Williams, Lindy, & Sobieszczyk, Teresa (1997) “Attitudes Surrounding the Continuation of Female Circumcision in the Sudan: Passing the Tradition to the Next Generation,” 59 J. of Marriage and the Family 966–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bronwyn (1994) “Women, the Law, and Cultural Relativism in France: The Case of Excision,” 19 Signs: J. of Women in Culture and Society 939–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1997) “Female Genital Mutilation,” Fact Sheet No. 153 (Apr.).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Immigration Control Responsibility Act of 1996, 22, U.S.C. § 262K-2 (1996).Google Scholar
Immigration Control Responsibility Act of 1996, 8, U.S.C. § 1374 (1996).Google Scholar
Immigration Control Responsibility Act of 1996, 18, U.S.C. § 116 (1996).Google Scholar
British Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act of 1985..Google Scholar
Canada C-126 An Act to Amend the Criminal Code of the Young Offenders Act..Google Scholar