Skip to main content Accessibility help

Varieties of Reconciliation

  • Jens Meierhenrich


In recent years scholars from neighboring disciplines have emphasized the importance of conceptual rigor in designing, administering, and interpreting research in the social sciences. Drawing on this new conceptualism, this article analyzes the much talked about notion of “reconciliation.” In an effort at structuring a useful debate on possible departures from historic injustice, the article formulates a systematized concept of reconciliation based on the multitude of meanings contained in theory and practice. It distinguishes varieties of reconciliation, organizing these varieties into types and subtypes. The article argues that while most varieties of reconciliation emanate from the same root concept, the various outer layers of meaning do not overlap. This hampers not only our understanding of reconciliation, but its promotion in the international system as well. In response to this methodological malaise, the article prescribes friendly amendments—conceptual modifications and refinements designed to increase measurement validation of reconciliation as a conceptual variable.



Hide All
Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95:529–46.
Adler, Jacob. 1990. Murphy and Mercy. Analysis 50:262–68.
American Arbitration Association. 2002. ADR and the Law. 18th ed. New York: American Arbitration Association.
American Political Science Association Organized Section in Comparative Politics. 1998. Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 9, Winter.
Ashworth, Andrew. 1993. Some Doubts about Restorative Justice. Criminal Law Forum 4:277–99.
Aubert, Vilhelm. 1989. Law and Social Change in Nineteenth-Century Norway. In History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, ed. Starr, June and Collier, Jane F. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Aubert, Vilhelm. [ 1969] 1997. Law as a Way of Resolving Conflicts: The Case of a Small Industrialized Society. In Law in Culture and Society, ed. Laura Nader. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Auerbach, Yehudith. 2004. The Role of Forgiveness in Reconciliation. In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, ed. Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov. 2004. From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1990. Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps. Studies in Comparative International Development 25:724.
Borneman, John. 2002. Reconciliation after Ethnic Cleansing: Listening, Retribution, Affiliation. Public Culture 14:281304.
Braithwaite, John. 2002. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braithwaite, John, and Pettit, Philip. 1990. Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cappelletti, Mauro. 1993. Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes within the Framework of the World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement. Modern Law Review 56:282–96.
Card, Claudia. 1972. On Mercy. Philosophical Review 81:182207.
Card, Claudia. 2002. The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collier, David, and Adcock, Robert. 1999. Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science 2:537–65.
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49:430–51.
Collier, David, and Mahon, James E. Jr. 1993. Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 87:845–55.
Cooley, John W. 1986. Arbitration vs. Mediation—Explaining the Differences. Judicature 69:263–69.
Cooper, John M., and Procopé, J. F., eds. 1995. Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coppedge, Michael. 1999. Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics. Comparative Politics 31:465–76.
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Digeser, Peter. 1998. Forgiveness and Politics: Dirty Hands and Imperfect Procedures. Political Theory 26:700–24.
Dressler, Joshua. 1990. Hating Criminals: How Can Something That Feels So Good Be Wrong? Michigan Law Review 88:1448–73.
Durkheim, Emile. [ 1938] 1964. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
Du Preez, Max. 2001. Too Many Truths to Tell. Sunday Independent (Johannesburg), June 24.
Dwyer, Susan. 1999. Reconciliation for Realists. Ethics & International Affairs 13:8198.
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, Laurel L., and Weinstein, Harvey M. 2002. Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly 24:573639.
Foster, George M. 1967. Tzintzuntzan: Mexican Peasants in a Changing World. Boston: Little, Brown.
Galanter, Marc. 1986. The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases. Judicature 69:256–62.
Garth, Bryant. 1982. The Movement toward Procedural Informalism in North America and Western Europe: A Critical Survey. In The Politics of Informal Justice, Volume 2: Comparative Studies, ed. Abel, Richard L. New York: Academic Press.
Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, James L. 2004. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York: Russell Sage.
Glasser, Cyril, and Roberts, Simon. 1993. Dispute Resolution: Civil Justice and Its Alternatives. Modern Law Review 56:277–79.
Gluckman, Max. 1955. The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Goodin, Robert E., and Tilly, Charles, eds. 2006. Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Govier, Trudy. 1999. Forgiveness and the Unforgivable. American Philosophical Quarterly 36:5975.
Gross, Jan T. 2001. Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haaken, Janice. 2002. The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly: Psychoanalytic and Cultural Perspectives on Forgiveness. In Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy, ed. Lamb, Sharon and Murphy, Jeffrie G. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, Peter A. 2003. Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hampton, Jean. 1988. The Retributive Idea. In Forgiveness and Mercy, ed. Murphy, Jeffrie and Hampton, Jean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hestevold, H. Scott. 1985. Justice to Mercy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46:281–91.
Holiday, Anthony. 1998. Forgiving and Forgetting: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa, ed. Nuttall, Sarah and Coetzee, Carli. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 2005. Forgiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lamb, Sharon, and Murphy, Jeffrie G., eds. 2002. Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lambourne, Wendy. 2001. Justice and Reconciliation: Postconflict Peacebuilding in Cambodia and Rwanda. In Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, ed. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Lang, Berel. 1994. Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly 31:105–17.
Levine, Donald. 1985. The Flight from Ambiguity: Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Little, David. 1999. A Different Kind of Justice: Dealing with Human Rights Violations in Transitional Societies. Ethics & International Affairs 13:6580.
Long, William, and Brecke, Peter. 2003. War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mahoney, James. 2004. Comparative-Historical Methodology. Annual Review of Sociology 30:81101.
McGary, Howard. 1989. Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly 26:343–51.
Miller, William Ian. 2006. Eye for An Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
Minow, Martha. 2002. Breaking the Cycles of Hatred: Memory, Law, and Repair. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Morton, Adam. 2004. On Evil. London: Routledge.
Muldrew, Craig. 1996. The Culture of Reconciliation: Community and the Settlement of Disputes in Early Modern England. The Historic Journal 39:915–42.
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1988. Forgiveness and Resentment. In Forgiveness and Mercy, ed. Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jean Hampton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 2003. Getting Even: Forgiveness and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Hampton, Jean. 1988a. Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Hampton, Jean, eds. 1988b. Mercy and Legal Justice. In Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nader, Laura, ed. [ 1969] 1997. Styles of Court Procedure: To Make the Balance. In Law in Culture and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nader, Laura. 2002a. Moving On—Comprehending Anthropologies of Law. In Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods, ed. Starr, June and Goodale, Mark. New York: Palgrave.
Nader, Laura. 2002b. The Life of the Law: Anthropological Projects. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Neu, Jerome. 2002. To Understand All Is to Forgive All—Or Is It? In Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy, ed. Lamb, Sharon and Murphy, Jeffrie G. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1988. Prospects and Policies for Soviet-American Reconciliation. Political Science Quarterly 103:197222.
North, Joanna. 1987. Wrongdoing and Forgiveness. Philosophy 62:499508.
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nuttall, Sarah, and Coetzee, Carli, eds. 1998. Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Polonsky, Antony, and Michlic, Joanna B., eds. 2004. Introduction to Part II. In The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Ringer, Fritz. 1997. Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roberts, Robert C. 1995. Forgivingness. American Philosophical Quarterly 32:289306.
Roberts, Simon, and Palmer, Michael. 2005. Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roche, Declan. 2003. Accountability in Restorative Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sampson, Steven. 2003. From Reconciliation to Coexistence. Public Culture 15:181–86.
Sarkin, Jeremy, and Daly, Erin. 2004. Too Many Questions, Too Few Answers: Reconciliation in Transitional Societies. C olumbia Human Rights Law Review 35:661728.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64:1033–53.
Sartori, Giovanni, ed. 1984. Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Schimmel, Solomon. 2003. Wounds Not Healed By Time: The Power of Repentance and Forgiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scobie, E. D., and Scobie, G. E. W. 1998. Damaging Events: The Perceived Need for Forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 28:373401.
Seneca. 1995. On Mercy. In Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, ed. Cooper, John M. and , J. F. Procopé. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shils, Edward A., and Finch, Henry A., eds. 1949. Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Shriver, Donald W. 1995. An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smart, Alwynne. 1968. Mercy. Philosophy 43:345–59.
Starr, June, and Collier, Jane F., eds. 1989. History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Starr, June, and Goodale, Mark, eds. 2002. Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods. New York: Palgrave.
Starr, June, and Yngvesson, Barbara. 1975. Scarcity and Disputing: Zeroing in on Compromise Decisions. American Ethnologist 2:553–66.
Strang, Heather. 2002. Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Strimling, Andrea. 2002. The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service: A Partner in International Conflict Prevention. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 2:417–43.
Tasioulas, John. 2003. Mercy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 103:101–32.
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. 1999. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, vol. 5. London: Macmillan.
Tutu, Desmond. 1999. No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.
Twambley, P. 1976. Mercy and Forgiveness. Analysis 36:8490.
Ulam, Adam B. 1968. Expansion and Coexistence: The History of Soviet Foreign Policy 1917–67. New York: Praeger.
United States Office of Personal Management. n.d. Section I: Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques and Agency Practices. (accessed January 10, 2006).
Van, Ness, Daniel, W. 1993. New Wine and Old Wineskins: Four Challenges of Restorative Justice. Criminal Law Forum 4:251–76.
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weber, Max. 1904 1949. “Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy. In Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences, ed. Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Wilson, Richard A. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Richard A. 2003. Justice and Retribution in Postconflict Settings. Public Culture 15:187–90.

Varieties of Reconciliation

  • Jens Meierhenrich


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed