Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Symposium on the 25th Anniversary of Horwitz's Transformation I
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003
References
Ernst, Daniel. 1993. The Critical Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. Yale Law Journal
101: 1019–76.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 2002. Morton Horwitz and His Critics: A Conflict of Narratives. Tulsa Law Review
37: 915–27.Google Scholar
Gutman, Herbert. 1983. No title. In Visions of History, ed. Abelove, Henry, and Thompson, E. P., 187–216. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F. D. R. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Holt, Wythe. 1982. Morton Horwitz and the Transformation of American Legal History. William and Mary Law Review
23: 663–723.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1971. The Emergence of an Instrumental Conception of American Law, 1780-1820. Perspectives in American History
5: 287–326.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1973. The Conservative Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. American Journal of Legal History
17: 275–94.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1975. The Rise of Legal Formalism. American Journal of Legal History
19: 251–64.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1999. The Warren Court and the Pursuit of Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Karsten, Peter. 1997. Heart Versus Head: Judge-Made Law in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McClain, Charles. 1980. Legal Change and Class Interests: A Review Essay on Morton Horwitz's Transformation of American Law. California Law Review
68: 382–97.Google Scholar
Moglen, Eben. 1993. The Transformation of Morton Horwitz. Columbia Law Review
93: 1042–59.Google Scholar
Presser, Stephen. 1977
Revising the Conservative Tradition: Towards A New American Legal History. New York University Law Review
52: 700–25.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiber, Harry. 1977. Back to “The Legal Mind”? Doctrinal Analysis and the History of the Law. Reviews in American History
5: 458–66.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gary. 1981. Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth-Century America: A Reinterpretation. Yale Law Journal
90: 1717–75.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B.
1980. The Horwitz Thesis and the History of Contracts. University of Chicago Law Review
46: 533–601.Google Scholar
Teachout, Peter. 1978. Light in Ashes: The Problem of “Respect for the Rule of Law” in American Legal History. New York University Law Review
53: 241–88.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1978. A Marxist Interpretation of American Law. Marxist Perspectives
1: 96–116.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1983. Critical Legal Studies: An Introduction to Its Origin and Underpinnings. Journal of Legal Education
36: 505–17.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 1993. Transforming History in the Postmodern Era. Michigan Law Review
91: 1315–52.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by