Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:01:01.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking Like a Historian: Erie in the Dimension of Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Daniel R. Ernst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , Summer 2001 , pp. 719 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Law Institute. 1969. Study of the Division of Jurisdiction between State and Federal Courts. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Aurelius, Marcus. 1983. The Meditations. Translated by Grube, G. M. A. Indianapolis, In.: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Bailey, Mark Warren. 1997. Moral Philosophy, the United States Supreme Court, and the Nation's Character, 1860–;1910. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10:249–71.Google Scholar
Brandeis, Louis D. 1985. The Louis Dembitz Brandeis Papers. American Legal Manuscripts from the Harvard Law School Library. Frederick, Md.: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Cousins, Norman. 1942. A Treasury of Democracy. New York: Coward-McCann.Google Scholar
Dawson, Nelson L. 1980. Louis D. Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, and the New Deal. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R. 1995. Lawyers against Labor: From Individual Rights to Corporate Liberalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R. 2000. Willard Hurst and the Administrative State: From Williams to Wisconsin. Law and History Review 18:1–36.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 1994. Reflections on the Hart and Wechsler Paradigm. Vanderbilt Law Review 47:953–91.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. 1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frankurter, Felix. 1986. The Felix Frankfurter Papers. American Legal Manuscripts from the Harvard Law School Library. Frederick, Md.: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and James Landis, M. 1928. The Business of the Supreme Court: A Study in the Federal Judicial System. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Freyer, Tony A. 1981. Harmony and Dissonance: The Swift and Erie Cases in American Federalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Georgetown University Law Center. 1995. The First 125 Years: An Illustrated History of the Georgetown University Law Center. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Law Center.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr., and Wechsler, Herbert. 1953. The Federal Courts and the Federal System. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Albert L. 1966. Autobiography of a Lawyer. Chicago: Privately printed.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1950. The Growth of American Law: The Law Makers. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard 1978. Modern American Legal History. Madison: Wisconsin Public Radio.Google Scholar
Hylton, J. Gordon. 1998. David Josiah Brewer and the Christian Constitution. Marquette Law Review 81:417–25.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kutler, Stanley I. 1968. Judicial Power and Reconstruction Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lash, Joseph P. 1988. Dealers and Dreamers: A New Look at the New Deal. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard L. 1986. The Party Period and Public Policy: American Politics from the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Przybyszewski, Linda C. A. 1999. The Republic according to John Marshall Harlan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1968, The Crisis of Democratic Theory: American Thought between the Wars, 1919–;1941. Ph.D. diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1969. American Jurisprudence between the Wars: Legal Realism and the Crisis of Democratic Theory. American Historical Review 75:424–46.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1973. The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1976. Alexander M. Bickel and the Post-Realist Constitution. Harvard Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Law Review 11:521–64.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1992a. Geography as a Litigation Weapon: Consumers, Forum-Selection Clauses, and the Rehnquist Court. UCLA Law Review 40:423–515.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1992b. Litigation and Inequality: Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Industrial America, 1870–;1958. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1994. Rethinking Constitutional Change. Virginia Law Review 80:277–90.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1995. Learned Hand: The Jurisprudential Trajectory of an Old Progressive. Buffalo Law Review 43:873–926.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr. 1999. Reconsidering the Frankfurterian Paradigm: Reflections on Histories of Lower Federal Courts. Law and Social Inquiry 24:679–750.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1982. In Search of Progressivism. Reviews in American History 10:113–132.Google Scholar
Ross, William G. 1994. A Muted Fury: Populists, Progressives, and Labor Unions Confront the Courts, 1890–;1937. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. 1995. Joel Bishop's Orthodoxy. Law and History Review 13:215–59.Google Scholar
Spillenger, Clyde. 1992. Reading the Book of Judicial Canon: Alexander Bickel and the Book of Brandeis. Journal of American History 79:125–51.Google Scholar
Spillenger, Clyde 1993. Lifting the Veil: The Judicial Biographies of Alpheus T. Mason. Reviews in American History 21:723–34.Google Scholar
Thomas, William G. 1999. Lawyering for the Railroad: Business, Law, and Power in the New South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Michael. 1997. Who's Afraid of Henry Hart Constitutional Commentary 14:175–207.Google Scholar
Wiecek, William M. 1969. The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power, 1863–;1876. American Journal of Legal History 13:333–59.Google Scholar
Willrich, Michael. 1998. The Two Percent Solution: Eugenic Jurisprudence and the Socialization of American Law, 1900–;1930. Law und History Review 19:63–111.Google Scholar