No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
The 2006 class action against James Frey, concerning his fabrications in A Million Little Pieces, was the first suit of its kind in the United States. There is nothing new about false memoirs, so what can explain the lawsuit? When the book was promoted on “Oprah's Book Club,” viewers were invited to respond emotionally, and saw their responses as a form of testimony. Those responses produced a sense of betrayal and inauthenticity when Frey's falsehoods were revealed. This view finds support in the eighteenth‐century sentimental novel, which similarly linked readers' reactions to the author's emotional authenticity. Fraud was an ongoing concern for sentimental novelists, some of whom used elaborate editorial to ploys to disavow responsibility for the text, while others populated their novels with fraudulent characters, intended as foils for the protagonist. An investigation of these novels helps to reveal the implications of the Frey case for future claims of literary fraud.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011
References
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Annese, Susanna. 2004. Mediated Identity in the Parasocial Interaction of TV. Identity
4 (4): 371–88.Google Scholar
Baines, Paul. 1999. The House of Forgery in Eighteenth‐Century Britain. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Barker‐Benfield, G. J.
1992. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth‐Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bastone, William A.
2006. A Million Little Lies: Exposing James Frey's Fiction Addiction, Jan. 8. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0104061jamesfrey1.html (accessed October 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Bender, John. 1997. Enlightenment Fiction and the Scientific Hypothesis. Representations
60:1–23.Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara. 1994. Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800. New York: AMS.Google Scholar
Bente, Gary, and Feist, Ansgar. 2000. Affect‐Talk and Its Kin. In Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal, ed. Zillman, Dolf and Vorderer, Peter, 113–34. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bertelsen, Lance. 1997. Committed by Justice Fielding: Judicial and Journalistic Representations in the Bow Street Magistrate's Office January 3–November 24, 1752. Eighteenth-Century Studies
30 (4): 337–63.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. 1980 1791. The Life of Johnson. Ed. Chapman, R. W.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braudy, Leo. 1973. The Form of the Sentimental Novel. Novel: A Forum on Fiction
7 (1): 5–13.Google Scholar
Brewer, David A.
2005. The Afterlife of Character, 1725–1826. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, William F., and Lichtenstein, Edward H.
1982. Stories Are to Entertain: A Structural‐Affect Theory of Stories. Journal of Pragmatics
6 (5–6): 473–86.Google Scholar
Brodey, Inger Sigrun. 2008. Ruined by Design: Shaping Novels and Gardens in the Culture of Sensibility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Budd, Adam. 2008. Aesthetic Sensibility and the Contours of Sympathy through Hume's Insertions to the Treatise
. In Theory and Practice in the Eighteenth Century: Writing between Literature and Philosophy, ed. Dick, Alexander and Lupton, Christina, 109–22. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Carroll, John, ed. 1964. Selected Letters of Samuel Richardson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chatterton, Thomas. 1777. Poems, Supposed to Have Been Written at Bristol, by Thomas Rowley, and Others, in the Fifteenth Century. Ed. Tyrwhitt, Thomas. London: Payne.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J.
1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Csengei, Ildiko. 2008. “I Will Not Weep”: Reading through the Tears of Henry Mackenzie's Man of Feeling
. Modern Language Review
103 (4): 952–68.Google Scholar
Daily Advertiser. 1777. [Untitled obituary for Reverend Charles Eccles]. Daily Advertiser (London), August 21, 1.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. 1985. Readers Respond to Rousseau: The Fabrication of Romantic Sensitivity. In The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History, 215–56. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Davis, Kimberly Chabot. 2004. Oprah's Book Club and the Politics of Cross‐Racial Empathy. International Journal of Cultural Studies
7 (4): 399–419.Google Scholar
Drescher, Horst W., ed. 1967. Henry Mackenzie: Letters to Elizabeth Rose of Kilravock. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Drescher, Horst W., ed. 1989. Literature and Literati: The Literary Correspondence and Notebooks of Henry Mackenzie, vol. 1: Letters 1766–1827. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eakin, Paul John. 2008. Living Autobiographically: How We Create Identity in Narrative. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eccles, Charles Steuart. 1776. The Necessity of Humiliation. Bath: Printed for the Author, and sold by R. Cruttwell.Google Scholar
Fielding, Sarah. 1998 1744. The Adventures of David Simple: Containing an Account of His Travels Through the Cities of London and Westminster, in the Search of a Real Friend. Ed. Sabor, Peter. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Fielding, Sarah. 1998 1753. The Adventures of David Simple, Volume the Last, in which his History is Concluded. Ed. Sabor, Peter. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Fielding, Sarah. 2004 1760. The History of Ophelia. Ed. Sabor, Peter. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. 1994. Nobody's Story: The Vanishing Acts of Woman Writers in the Marketplace, 1760–1820. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. 2006. The Rise of Fictionality. In The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture, ed. Moretti, Franco, 336–353. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gazetteer and New Daily Advertiser. 1777. [Untitled obituary for Reverend Charles Eccles]. Gazetteer and New Daily Advertiser (London), August 30, 3, col. 1.Google Scholar
General Evening Post. 1777. [Untitled obituary for Reverend Charles Eccles]. General Evening Post (London), August 19, 4, col. 2.Google Scholar
Gildon, Charles. 1719. The Life and Strange Suprizing Adventures of Mr. D—De F–. London: Roberts.Google Scholar
Goring, Paul. 2005. Polite Reading: Sentimental Fiction and the Performance of Response. In The Rhetoric of Sensibility in Eighteenth‐Century Culture, 142–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greeves, J. R. H.
1953. Notes on the Family of Grierson of Dublin. Irish Genealogist
2 (10): 303–37.Google Scholar
Groom, Nick. 1996. Forgery or Plagiarism? Unravelling Chatterton's Rowley. Angelaki
1 (2): 41–54.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Geoff. 2007. Mixing Memory and Desire: James Frey, Wound Culture, and the “Essential America Soul. Journal of American Culture
30 (3): 324–33.Google Scholar
Harker, Jaime. 2008. Oprah, James Frey, and the Problems of the Literary. In The Oprah Effect: Critical Essays on Oprah's Book Club, ed. Farr, Cecilia Konchar and Harker, Jaime, 321–34. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Henige, David. 2009. Authorship Renounced: The “Found” Source in the Historical Record. Journal of Scholarly Publishing
41 (1): 31–55.Google Scholar
Hyman, Stacey A.
2007. The James Frey Scandal: A Million Frivolous Lawsuits. Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law
17 (1): 211–45.Google Scholar
Lahav, Alexandra. 2008. Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Dead Souls, Phantom Clients, and the Modern Class Action. Studies in Law, Politics and Society
40: 153–84.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Tom. 1989. Eliza Haywood in 1749: Dalinda and the Pamphlet on the Pretender. Notes & Queries (new series) 36 (4): 475–77.Google Scholar
Lofton, Kathryn. 2008. Public Confessions: Oprah Winfrey's American Religious History. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory
18 (1): 51–69.Google Scholar
London Chronicle. 1777. [Notice concerning The Man of Feeling]. London Chronicle, November 4, 447.Google Scholar
Lunt, Peter, and Stenner, Paul. 2005.
The Jerry Springer Show as an Emotional Public Sphere. Media, Culture & Society
27 (1): 59–81.Google Scholar
Lynch, Jack. 2008. Deception and Detection in Eighteenth‐Century England. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Henry. 1771. The Man of Feeling. Dublin: Printed for W. Sleater, D. Chamberlaine, J. Hoey, jun.[,] J. Williams, J. Potts, and R. Moncrieffe.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Henry, ed. 1805. Report of the Committee of the Highland Society of Scotland, Appointed to Inquire into the Nature and Authenticity of the Poems of Ossian. Edinburgh, Scotland: Constable.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Henry. 1987 1771. The Man of Feeling. Ed. Vickers, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, James. 1760. Fragments of Ancient Poetry, Collected in the Highlands of Scotland, and Translated from the Galic or Erse Language. Edinburgh, Scotland: Hamilton and Balfour.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. 1986. The Figure of Theater: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGowen, Randall. 2002. Making the “Bloody Code”? Forgery Legislation in Eighteenth‐Century England. In Law, Crime & English Society, 1660–1800, ed. Landau, Norma, 117–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyler, William. 1777a. Verses Composed on Viewing the Turfless Grave of the Rev. Mr. Eccles. London Evening Post, September 16, 2.Google Scholar
Meyler, William. 1777b. Verses Composed on Viewing the Turfless Grave of the Rev. Mr. Eccles. Public Advertiser (London), September 18, 1.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K.
2007. The Entangled Self: Genre Bondage in the Age of Memoir. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association
122 (2): 537–48.Google Scholar
Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser. 1777. To the Printer of the Morning Chronicle. Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser, October 3, 4.Google Scholar
Mullan, John. 1988. Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mullan, John. 1996. Sentimental Novels. In The Cambridge Companion to the Eighteenth‐Century Novel, ed. Richetti, John, 236–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nabi, Robin L., and Hendriks, Alexandra. 2003. The Persuasive Effect of Host and Audience Reaction Shots in Television Talk Shows. Journal of Communication
53 (3): 527–43.Google Scholar
Novak, Maximillian E.
2003. Daniel Defoe: Master of Fictions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paige, Nicholas. 2008. Rousseau's Readers Revisited: The Aesthetics of La Nouvelle Héloïse
. Eighteenth-Century Studies
42 (1): 131–54.Google Scholar
Plomer, H. R.
1968 1932. A Dictionary of the Printers and Booksellers Who Were at Work in England, Scotland, and Ireland from 1726 to 1775. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Public Advertiser (London). 1777. [Notice concerning The Man of Feeling]. Public Advertiser (London), November 4, 2.Google Scholar
Raven, James. 2003. The Anonymous Novel in Britain and Ireland, 1750–1830. In The Faces of Anonymity: Anonymous and Pseudonymous Publication from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century, ed. Griffin, R. J., 141–66. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russett, Margaret. 2006. Fictions and Fakes: Forging Romantic Authenticity, 1760–1845. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
St. James's Chronicle or the British Evening Post (London). 1777. [Notice concerning The Man of Feeling]. St. James's Chronicle or the British Evening Post (London), November 4, 2.Google Scholar
Schramm, Jan‐Melissa. 2009. Testimony, Witnessing. In Law and the Humanities: An Introduction, ed. Sarat, Austin, Anderson, Matthew D., and Frank, Cathrine O., 478–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Sir Walter. 1930. The Private Letter‐Books of Sir Walter Scott. Ed. Partington, Wilfred. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Scott, Sir Walter. 1972 1890. The Journal of Sir Walter Scott. Ed. Anderson, W. E. K.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Segal, David. 2007. Nothing but the Truth: The Author of a Hoax Insists Her Creation Is No Fraud. Washington Post, June 21, C1.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 2002 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterne, Laurence. 2003 1768. A Sentimental Journey and Other Writings. Ed. Parnell, Tim and Jack, Ian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Susan. 1994. Crimes of Writing: Problems in the Containment of Representation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, Richard. 2004.
David Simple and the Fallacy of Friendship. Studies in English Literature
44 (3): 525–44.Google Scholar
Tovares, Alla V.
2006. Public Medium, Private Talk: Gossip about a TV Show as “Quotidian Hermeneutics.”
Text & Talk
26 (4–5): 463–91.Google Scholar
Trepte, Sabine. 2005. Daily Talk as Self‐Realization: An Empirical Study on Participation in Daily Talk Shows. Media Psychology
7 (2): 165–89.Google Scholar
Voskuil, Lynne M.
2004. Acting Naturally: Victorian Theatricality and Authenticity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, Alexander. 1992. Strong Representations: Narrative and Circumstantial Evidence in England. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry. 1904. A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law. Vol. 3. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar
Womersley, David, ed. 2000. Henry Mackenzie, The Man of Feeling
. In A Companion to Literature from Milton to Blake, 387–92. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, R. S.
1873. The Law of Criminal Conspiracies and Agreements. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Everett. 1996. The Boundaries of Fiction: History and the Eighteenth‐Century British Novel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cases Cited
Anonymous, 6 Mod. 105, 87 Eng. Rep. 863 (Q.B. 1703).Google Scholar
Antidote Int'l Films, Inc. v. Bloomsbury Pub., PLC, 467 F. Supp. 2d 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).Google Scholar
Floyd v. Doubleday, C.A. No. 1:06‐693 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).Google Scholar
Giles v. Frey, C.A. No. 1:06‐58 (S.D. Ohio 2006).Google Scholar
Hauenstein v. Frey, C.A. No. 2:06‐1030 (C.D. Cal. 2006).Google Scholar
In re “A Million Little Pieces” Litigation, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2006) (consolidation order).Google Scholar
R. v. Jones, 1 Salk. 379, 91 Eng. Rep. 330 (Q.B. 1703).Google Scholar
R. v. Jones, 2 Ld. Raym. 1013, 92 Eng. Rep. 174 (Q.B. 1703).Google Scholar
McCall Co. v. Wright, 117 N.Y.S. 775 (App. Div. 1909).Google Scholar
Marolda v. Frey, C.A. No. 1:06‐1167 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).Google Scholar
More v. Frey, C.A. No. 1:06‐934 (N.D. Ill. 2006).Google Scholar
Paglinawan v. Frey, C.A. No. 2:06‐99 (W.D. Wash. 2006).Google Scholar
Rubenstein v. Frey, C.A. No. 2:06‐1029 (C.D. Cal. 2006).Google Scholar
Snow v. Doubleday, C.A. No. 1:06‐669 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).Google Scholar
Strack v. Frey, C.A. No. 1:06‐933 (N.D. Ill. 2006).Google Scholar
Teague v. Baker, 35 F.3d 978 (4th Cir. 1994).Google Scholar
Thompson v. Trevanion, Holt 286, 90 Eng. Rep. 1057 (K.B. 1693).Google Scholar
Vedral v. Frey, C.A. No. 1:06‐935 (N.D. Ill., filed Feb. 2, 2006).Google Scholar
Winter v. G.P. Putnam's Sons, 938 F.2d 1033, 1037 (9th Cir. 1991).Google Scholar