Skip to main content Accessibility help

Rorschach Tests, Pluralism, and Hopes for the Future: A Response to the Responses

  • Kitty Calavita


In this essay, I address some of the concerns raised by contributors to the Symposium on Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. I argue that law and society scholarship focusing on race increasingly offers some of our field's best empirical analyses of the interpenetration of law and society; I emphasize the importance of the methodological and theoretical diversity that characterizes our fragmented field, arguing that our pluralism is one of our greatest strengths; I clarify my intended meaning of the term “real law” as I use it in the book's subtitle, as a way to underscore the socially constituted quality of all law; I attempt to rescue the reputation of dialectics from charges of “relativism”; and I reiterate my appreciation for our field's engagement with questions of social justice that has characterized it since its inception. In the second half of the essay, I briefly describe my current prison research and offer some thoughts for the future of our field.



Hide All
Abel, Richard L. 1995. Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle Against Apartheid, 1980–1994. New York: Routledge.
Beckett, Katherine 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bridgman, Percy 1950. Reflections of a Physicist. New York: Philosophical Library.
Bumiller, Kristin 1988. The Civil Rights Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Calavita, Kitty 2002. Engaged Research, “Goose Bumps”, and the Role of the Public Intellectual. Law & Society Review 36:520.
Calavita, Kitty 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 1998. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Constable, Marianne 2007. Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Foucault, Michel 1979. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.
Galanter, Marc 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9:95160.
Gomez, Laura 2007. Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race. New York: New York University Press.
Hagan, John 2010. Who Are the Criminals? The Politics of Crime Policy from the Age of Roosevelt to the Age of Reagan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haney Lopez, Ian F. 1996. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.
Levinson, Sanford 2002. To All Persons Interested in Law and the Performing Arts.
Loury, Glenn C. 2007. Why Are So Many Americans in Prison? Race and the Transformation of Criminal Justice. Boston Review July/August:7–10.
Macaulay, Stewart 1984. Law and the Behavioral Sciences: Is There a There There? Law & Policy 6:149187.
Mertz, Elizabeth 1988. The Uses of History: Language, Ideology, and Law in the United States and South Africa. Law & Society Review 22:661685.
Morrill, Calvin, Edelman, Lauren B., Tyson, Karolyn, and Arum, Richard 2010. Legal Mobilization in Schools: The Paradox of Rights and Race Among Youths. Law & Society Review 44:651694.
Murakawa, Naomi 2006. The Racial Antecedents to Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Roger Williams University Law Review 11:473494.
Provine, Doris Marie 2007. Unequal Under Law: Race in the War on Drugs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Salyer, Lucy E. 1995. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Scheingold, Stuart 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Weaver, Vesla M. 2007. Frontlash: Race and the Development of Punitive Crime Policy. Studies in American Political Development 21:230265.
Western, Bruce 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed