Skip to main content Accessibility help

Political Lawyers: The Structure of a National Network

  • Anthony Paik, John P. Heinz and Ann Southworth


Some research on lawyers active in politics has found that the ties among them create networks in which a center or core of influential actors is surrounded by more peripheral participants. Other studies, however, found more segmented networks, sometimes lacking central players. This research examines the structure and determinants of political ties among forty-seven elite lawyers who served organizations prominent in fourteen national policy issues in 2004–05. The analysis finds a network structure that resembles a rough circle with Republicans on one side and Democrats on the other. Lawyers affiliated with organizations representing a broad constellation of interests are closer to the center of the network, while those working for specialized or narrow causes tend to be located in the periphery. Ties are more dense among conservatives than among liberals. Lawyers who work as organizational leaders or managers are more likely to be near the center than are litigators. Central actors contribute larger amounts to election campaigns. The organized bar, especially the American Bar Association, appears to provide links between liberals and conservatives in one segment of the network.



Hide All
Bearman, Peter. 1997. Generalized Exchange. American Journal of Sociology 102:1383–415.
Bearman, Peter S., Moody, James, and Stovel, Katherine. 2004. Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks. American Journal of Sociology 110:3391.
Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology 92:1170–82.
Domhoff, G. William. 1974. The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats. New York: Harper & Row.
Domhoff, G. William. 1983. Who Rules America Now? A View for the '80s. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Edsall, Thomas B., and Milbank, Dana. 2005. The Right's Moment, Years in the Making. Washington Post, July 3, A1.
Federalist Society Web site. 2010. About Us. http://www.fed‐ (accessed April 25, 2011).
Freeman, Linton. 1979. Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarifications. Social Networks 1:125–39.
Friedkin, Noah E. 1991. Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures. American Journal of Sociology 96:1478–504.
Hanneman, Robert A., and Riddle, Mark. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside.
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert H. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policymaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heinz, John P., Paik, Anthony, and Southworth, Ann. 2003. Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance. Law & Society Review 37:550.
Hill, The. 2007. The New Sheriffs in Town. The Hill, April 25, 2426.
Hogg, Michael A. 1987. Social Identity and Group Cohesiveness. In Rediscovering the Social Group, ed. Turner, John C., Hogg, Michael A., Oakes, Penelope J., Reicher, Stephen D., and Wetherell, Margaret S., 89116. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Kirkpatrick, David D. 2004. Club of the Most Powerful Gathers in Strictest Privacy. New York Times, August 28, A10.
Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Knoke, David. 1994. Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making. In Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Wasserman, Stanley and Galaskiewicz, Joseph, 274–94. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Knoke, David, and Yang, Song. 2008. Social Network Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Laumann, Edward O., and Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert H. 1985. Washington Lawyers and Others: The Structure of Washington Representation. Stanford Law Review 37:465502.
Laumann, Edward O., and Marsden, Peter V. 1979. The Analysis of Oppositional Structures in Political Elites: Identifying Collective Actors. American Sociological Review 44:713–32.
Laumann, Edward O., Marsden, Peter V., and Prensky, David. 1989. The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, ed. Freeman, Linton C. and White, Douglas R., 1834. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
Levine, John M., and Moreland, Richard L. 1990. Progress in Small Group Research. Annual Review of Psychology 41:585634.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922 1984. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Reprint, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
McGuire, Kevin T. 1993. The Supreme Court Bar: Legal Elites in the Washington Community. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Miller, Charles E., and Komorita, Samuel S. 1986. Coalition Formation in Organizations. In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, ed. Lewicki, Roy J., Sheppard, Blair H., and Bazerman, Max H., 117–37. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moore, Gwen. 1979. The Structure of a National Elite Network. American Sociological Review 44:673–92.
National Journal. 2007. Leading Democratic Lobbyists. March 31, 32.
Nordlund, Carl. 2007. Identifying Regular Blocks in Valued Networks: A Heuristic Applied to the St. Marks Carbon Flow Data, and International Trade in Cereal Products. Social Networks 29:5969.
Paik, Anthony, Southworth, Ann, and Heinz, John P. 2007. Lawyers of the Right: Networks and Organization. Law & Social Inquiry 32:883917.
Salisbury, Robert, Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., and Nelson, Robert L. 1987. Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition. American Political Science Review 81:1217–34.
Southworth, Ann. 2008. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Southworth, Ann, Paik, Anthony, and Heinz, John P. 2011. “Lawyers in National Policymaking.” In The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice, ed. Cummings, Scott. 220–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teles, Steven. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Useem, Michael. 1984. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).
Kelo v. New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

Political Lawyers: The Structure of a National Network

  • Anthony Paik, John P. Heinz and Ann Southworth


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed