Skip to main content Accessibility help

Localizing Global Rules: Public Participation in Lawmaking in Vietnam

  • John Gillespie


As the pace of legal harmonization in developing East Asian states increases to comply with international trading treaties, a disjunction is forming between legislative expectations and everyday business practices. Evidence considered in this article suggests that Vietnam is no exception. State control over public discourse favors the interests of business elites, while small-scale entrepreneurs struggle to make their views known. Lawmakers exposed to this asymmetric discourse rarely adjust global legal rules to suit the transactional requirements of small-scale entrepreneurs. As a consequence, the largely imported commercial legislative framework is increasingly reflecting the interests of business elites. The article concludes that for the state to develop a more inclusive regulatory regime, it needs to relax its control over public deliberation and give small-scale entrepreneurs more opportunities to convey local precepts and practices to lawmakers.



Hide All
Bach Quoc An, and Thi Van Anh. 2002. BTA's Impact on Vietnam's Current Legal System. Vietnam Law and Legal Forum 8 (91): 1618.
Baxter, Hugh. 1998. Autopoiesis and the “Relative Autonomy” of Law. Cardozo Law Review 19:19872090.
Black, Julia. 2000. Proceduralizing Regulation: Part I. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4): 597614.
Black, Julia. 2002. Regulatory Conversations. Journal of Law and Society 29 (1): 163–96.
Boisot, Max. 1995. Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture. London: Routledge.
Carruthers, Bruce, and Halliday, Terrence. 2006. Negotiating Globalization: Global Scripts and Intermediation in the Construction of Asian Insolvency Regimes. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (3): 521–84.
Chiba, Masaji. 1997. Japan. In Asian Legal Systems, ed. Tan, Pho-Ling, 82123. Sydney: Buttersworth.
CIEM. 1998. Danh Gia Tong Ket: Luat Cong Ty va Kien Nghi Nhung Dinh Huong Sua Doi Chu Yeu [Review of the Current Company Law and Key Recommendations for Its Revision]. Hanoi: CIEM.
Dau Tu. 2006. Automobile Sales Plunge as High Taxes Bite. (accessed April 1, 2007).
De Soto, Hernando. 1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper & Row.
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2001. The Import and Export of Law and Legal Institutions: International Strategies in National Palace Wars. In Adapting Legal Cultures, ed. Nelken, David and Feest, Johannes, 241–53. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Dinh Gia Trinh. 1961. May Y Kien Dong Gop Ve Van De Bao Ve Phap Che [Some Opinions on the Protection of Legality]. Tap San Tu Phap 3:2024.
Dixon, C. 2004. State, Party, and Political Change in Viet Nam. In Rethinking Viet Nam, ed. McCargo, Duncan, 1526. London: Routledge Curzon.
Do, Sang, and Hanh, Dui. 1986. Ve De: Lam Xa Hoi Chu Nhgia bang Nha Nuoc [On the Use of the State to Realise Socialist Collective Mastery]. Hanoi: Nha Xuat Ban Phap Ly [Law Publishing House].
Duong Dang Hue. 2005. Unified Enterprise Bill and the Fulfilment of Investment Relation Development Commitments in the BTA. Vietnam Law and Legal Forum 11 (132): 26.
Dryzek, John. 2000a. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, John. 2000b. Discursive Democracy vs. Liberal Constitutionalism. In Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association, ed. Saward, Michael, 7889. London: Routledge.
Fforde, Adam. 2005. SOEs, Law and a Decade of Market-Orientated Socialist Development. In Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese Renewal and Chinese Reform, ed. Gillespie, John and Nicholson, Pip, 239–66. Canberra, Australia: Asia-Pacific Press.
Frankenburg, Gunther. 1985. Critical Comparisons: Re-Thinking Comparative Law. Harvard International Law Journal 26:411–56.
Gainsborough, Martin. 2002. Changing Political Economy of Vietnam: The Case of Ho Chi Minh City. London: Routledge Curzon.
Gerber, David. 2004. Authority Heuristics. Chicago Kent Law Review 79 (3): 959–76.
Gillespie, John. 2002. Transplanted Company Law: An Ideological and Cultural Analysis of Market-Entry in Vietnam. International Comparative Law Quarterly 51:641–72.
Gillespie, John. 2006. Transplanting Commercial Law Reform: Developing a “Rule of Law” in Vietnam. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Goodman, Ellen. 1995. The Origins of Western Legal Tradition: From Thales to Tudors. Sydney: Federation Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1991. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hajer, Maarten. 2003. A Frame in the Fields: Policy Making and the Reinvention of Politics. In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, ed. Hajer, Maarten and Wagenaar, Hendrik, 88112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halpin, Andrew. 2001. Reasoning with Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Hannah, Joe. 2005. Civil-Society Actors and Action in Vietnam: Preliminary Empirical Results and Sketches from an Evolving Debate. In Towards Good Society: Civil Society Actors, The State, and The Business Class in Southeast Asia—Facilitators of or Impediments to a Strong, Democratic, and Fair Society?, ed. Heinrich Böll Foundation, 239–66. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
Hendriks, Carolyn. 2005. Participatory Storylines and their Influence on Deliberative Forums. Policy Science 38:120.
Hoang Hai Van. 2004. Bo Tu Phap, UBND TPHCM de Nghi: Giu Nguyen Muc Thue Thu Nhap Doanh Nghiep 10% Cho Lien Doanh Phu My Hung [Ministry of Justice and Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee Propose that Corporate Income Tax Rate Remain at 10 Percent for Phu My Hung Joint Venture]. Thanh Nien, February 7, p 3.
Hy Van Luong. 1994. The Marxist State and Dialogic Re-Structuration of Culture in Rural Vietnam. In Indochina: Social and Cultural Change, ed. Elliott, D., Luong, H. V., Kiernan, B., and Mahoney, T., 79117. Claremont, CA: Keck Center of International and Strategic Studies, Claremont McKenna College.
Industry Magazine. 2003. Hiep Hoi Doanh Nghiep Dien Tu Nhung Bai Hoc Kinh Nghiem [Lessons Experienced by the Electronic Enterprise Association]. Industry Magazine, May 25. (accessed March 21, 2007).
Jensen, Erik. 2003. The Rule of Law and Judicial Reform: The Political Economy of Diverse Institutional Patterns and Reformers’ Responses. In Beyond Common Knowledge, ed. Jensen, Erik and Heller, Thomas, 345–63. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jeong, Yeonsik 1997. The Rise of State Corporatism in Vietnam. Contemporary Southeast Asia 19 (2): 152–72.
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2003. Getting Organized in Vietnam: Moving In and Around the Socialist State. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2001. An Approach for Analyzing State-Society Relations in Vietnam. Sojourn 16 (2): 129.
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2005. The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Koh, David. 2000. Wards of Hanoi and State-Society Relations in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. PhD diss., Department of Political and Social Change, Australian National University.
Le Cam. 2002. Cai Cach He Thong Toa An Trong Giai Doan Xay Dung Nha Nuoc Phap Quyen Viet Nam [Reform the Court System to Build Up a Law Based State in Vietnam]. Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Lap Phap 4:2127.
Le Dang Doanh. 1999. Enterprise Law—A Must for Further Development of Multi-Sectorial Economy. Vietnam Law Legal Forum 56:1113.
Le Minh Thong. 2003. Mot So Van De Phap Ly Cua Qua Trinh Toan Cau Hoa [Some Legal Issues on Globalisation] Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Lap 1:6575.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. The Unity of the Legal System. In Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, ed. Teubner, Gunther, 1225. London: Kluwers.
Marr, David. 1994. The Vietnam Communist Party and Civil Society. Unpublished paper, presented to the Vietnam Update Conference, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, November 11.
McAdams, Richard. 1997. The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms. Michigan Law Review 96 (2): 338–33.
McMillan, John, and Woodruff, Christopher. 2000. Private Order under Dysfunctional Public Order. Michigan Law Review 98:2421–58.
Ministry of Justice. 2005. Update of Major Activities Conducted by Various Projects. Biannual Conference and Legal Partnership Conference, Da Nang, Oct. 12.
Nguyen Chi Dung. 2006. “Van Dong Hanh Lang” Trong Hoat Dong Lap Phap Cac Nuoc va Xu Huong O Viet Nam [“Lobbying” in Global Lawmaking and the Trend in Vietnam]. Tap Chi Nghiem Cuu Lap Phap 9 (83): 5157, 60.
Nguyen Cuu Viet. 1997. “Nhan Thuc Ve Nguyen Tac Tap Quyen va Vai Khia Canh” Trong Van De Ve Quan He Giua Lap Phap va Hanh Phap O Nuoc Ta Hien Nay [Some Perceptions of the Principles of “Unity of Power” and a Few Aspects of the Relationship Between the Legislative and Executive of Bodes of Vietnam Today]. Nha Nuoc va Phap Luat 2:44, 4749.
Nguyen Dang Dung. 2001. Phap Luat Khong Chi La Cong Cu Cua Nha Nuoc [Law Is Not Only the Instrument of the State]. Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Lap Phap 11:5357.
Nguyen Hong. 2002. Policies Given Modest Thumbs up at Forum. Vietnam Investment Review May, 34.
Nguyen Ngoc Lam. 2007. Vai Tro Cua Hiep Hoi Doanh Nghiep Doi Voi Su Phat Trien Cua Doanh Nghiep va Doanh Nhan [Roles of the Enterprise Association Towards Development of Businesses and Businessmen]. To Chuc Nha Nuoc 1:3031.
Norland, Irene, Ngoc, Tran, and Tuyen, Nguyen Dinh. 2003. Dealing with Donors: The Politics of Vietnam's Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy. Policy Paper 4, Institute of Development Studies. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Office of Government. 2003. Study Report to Improve the Quality of Laws and Ordinances Drafted by the Government to be Submitted to the NA and the NA Standing Committee, unpublished report. Working Delegation No. 804, Hanoi, December.
Oquendo, Angel R. 2002. Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2): 189226.
Peerenboom, Randall. 2002. China's Long March towards Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pham Duy Nghia. 2000. Phap Luat Thuong Mai Viet Nam Truoc Thach Thuc Cua Qua Trinh Hoi Nhap Linh Te Quac Te [Commercial Law Faces the Challenges of International Economic Integration] Nha Nuoc va Phap Luat 6:924.
Pham Duy Nghia. 2001. Mot So Anh Huong Truc Tiep Cua Qua Trinh Hoi Nhap Kinh Te Khu Vuc va The Gioi Doi Voi Phap Luat Viet Nam [Some Direct Influences of the World's and Regional Economic Integration into Vietnamese Law]. Tap Chi Nghien cuu Lap Phap 2:37.
Pham Duy Nghia. 2005. Confucianism and the Conception of the Law in Vietnam. In Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform, ed. Gillespie, John and Nicholson, Pip, 7690. Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press.
Pham Duy Nghia. 2006. Nguy Co Cua Chung Ta: Mot Nha Nuoc Thieu Nang Luc Phan Ung [Our Danger: A State of Limited Pensiveness]. Nha Nuoc va Phap Luat 6:35.
Pham Van Chuc. 2002. Dang Co Chang Mot Toan Cau Hoa Cho Moi Nguoi [Is There Now a Globalization for all People?]. Tap Chi Cong San 12:3336.
Pham Van Dong. 1977. Strengthen the Party Leadership, Carry Out the State's Managerial Functions and Develop the People's Right to Ownership in Order to Successfully Fulfil the 1977 State Plan. Ho Chi Minh City Domestic Service, January 22, 4. Trans. FIBIS East Asia Daily Service (16), January 25, K9, K11-K13.
Potter, Jonathan, and Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behavior. London: Sage Publications.
Quinn, Brian. 2002. Legal Reform and Its Context in Vietnam. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 15 (2): 219–91.
Rawls, John. 1993. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Robertson, Michael. 1999. Picking Positivism Apart: Stanley Fish on Epistemology and Law. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 8:401–48.
Rose, Carol. 1998. The “New” Law and Development Movement in the Post-Cold War Era: A Vietnam Case Study. Law & Society Review 32 (1): 93135.
Rosenberg, Shawn 2005. The Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy: Setting the Research Agenda. Acta Politica 40 (2): 212–24.
Rorty, Richard. 2000. Universality and Truth. In Rorty and his Critics, ed. Brandom, Robert, 125. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Sai Gon Giai Phong. 2004. Cloudy Reasoning in Phu My Hung Tax Row. Sai Gon Giai Phong, August 21, 3. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia News Services, Aug. 25, 1415.
Salomon, Matthieu. 2007. Power and Representation at the Vietnamese National Assembly: The Scope and Limits of Political Doi Moi . In Vietnam's New Order: International Perspectives on the State and Reform in Vietnam, ed. Balme, Stephanie and Sidel, Mark, 198216. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Santos, Alvaro. 2006. The World Bank's Uses of the “Rule of Law” Promise in Economic Development. In The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Apraisal, ed. Trubek, David and Santos, Alvaro, 253300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidel, Mark. 1993. Law Reform in Vietnam: The Complex Transition from Socialism and Soviet Models in Legal Scholarship and Timing. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 11:221–59.
Sidel, Mark. 1997. Generational and Institutional Transition in the Vietnamese Communist Party. Asian Survey 37 (5): 481506.
Sidel, Mark. 2002. Analytical Models for Understanding Constitutions and Constitutional Dialogue in Socialist Transitional States: Re-Interpreting Constitutional Dialogue in Vietnam. Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 6:4289.
Stromseth, Jonathon. 2003. Business Associations and Policy-Making in Vietnam. In Getting Organized in Vietnam: Moving In and Around the Socialist State, ed. Kerkvliet, Benedict, Heng, Russell, and Koh, David, 62109. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Tan Duc. 1999. Bo Dieu 164 Cho Doanh Nhan Yen Tam Lam An [Revoke Article 164 to Make Businessman Feel Assured in Doing Their Business]. Thoi Bao Kinh Te Sai Gon [ Saigon Economic Times ], May 20, 1011.
Taussig, Markus. 2005. Domestic Companies in Vietnam: Challenges for Development of Vietnam's Most Important SMEs. The William Davidson Institute, Policy Brief No 34. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
Teubner, Gunter. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.
Teubner, Gunter. 1998. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences. Modern Law Review 61 (1): 1132.
Thanh Nien. 2004a. Draft Competition Law Flawed: Professor. Thanh Nien, Nov. 9, 3. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia New Service, Nov. 10, 7.
Thanh Nien. 2004b. Direct Democracy for Public Issues. Thanh Nien, Aug. 19, 3. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia News, Nov. 21, 19.
Thanh Nien. 2007. US Investors Struggle. Thanh Nien, Mar. 11, 4. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia News Service Mar. 13, 12.
Thayer, Carlyle. 1995. Mono-Organizational Socialism and the State. In Vietnam's Rural Transformation, ed. Kerkvliet, Benedict and Porter, David, 3964. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tran Huu Huynh, and Dau Anh Tuan. n.d. Draft Report Business Associations. Hanoi: VCCI. (The report is on file with the author.)
UNDP. 1999. Completion of Viet Nam's Legal Framework for Economic Development. UNDP Discussion Paper No. 2. Hanoi: self-published.
Van Dijk, Teun., ed. 1997. The Study of Discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process, 135. London: Sage.
Van Thong. 1999. Tong Ke Khai Nha Dat: Phan Dinh Chua Ro Quan Ly Hanh Chinh Cua Nha Nuoc [House and Land Declaration: Unclear Determination of State Administration]. Thoi Bao Kinh Te Sai Gon [Saigon Economic Times], July 29, 37.
VCCI. 1993. Strengthening the Organization and Activities of the Chamber of Commerce. Vietnam Investment Review August: 11.
VNS. 2007. Steel Producers Feeling Threatened by Chinese Imports. Viet Nam News, Mar. 12, 15.
Vo Kim Son. 2006. Nen Hanh Chinh Theo Huong “Dan Biet, Dan Ban, Dan Lam, Dan Kiem Tra” La Mot Nen Hanh Chinh Minh Bach, Cong Khaki, Mo Cua Void Dan [National Administrative Reform Influenced by the “People Know, Discuss, Do, and Supervise”]. To Chuc Nha Nuoc 7:1718.
Walker, Neil. 2002. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review 65 (3): 317–59.
Walzer, Michael. 1992. The Civil Society Argument. In Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, ed. Mouffe, Chantal, 89107. London: Verso.
Watson, Allen. 1978. Comparative Law and Legal Change. Cambridge Law Journal 37:313–36.
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. Positioning and Interpretive Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Poststructuralism in Dialogue. Discourse and Society 9:389412.
World Bank. 2005. Vietnam Development Report: Governance. Hanoi: World Bank.
World Bank. n.d. EAP Sustainable Development on the Urban Fringe Vietnam Country Study. (unpublished report) First Stage Report, Hanoi: World Bank.

Localizing Global Rules: Public Participation in Lawmaking in Vietnam

  • John Gillespie


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed