Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:42:13.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Transnationalism: The Relationship between Transnational Social Movement Building and International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Tamara Kay
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the compelling enigma of how the introduction of a new international law, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC), helped stimulate labor cooperation and collaboration in the 1990s. It offers a theory of legal transnationalism—defined as processes by which international laws and legal mechanisms facilitate social movement building at the transnational level—that explains how nascent international legal institutions and mechanisms can help develop collective interests, build social movements, and, ultimately, stimulate cross‐border collaboration and cooperation. It identifies three primary dimensions of legal transnationalism that explain how international laws stimulate and constrain movement building through: (1) formation of collective identity and interests (constitutive effects), (2) facilitation of collective action (mobilization effects), and (3) adjudication and enforcement (redress effects).

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , Spring 2011 , pp. 419 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Ellen Ann. 2005. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Atleson, James, Compa, Lance, Rittich, Kerry, Sharpe, Calvin William, and Weiss, Marley S. 2008. International Labor Law: Cases and Materials on Workers' Rights in the Global Economy. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Audley, John. 1997. Green Politics and Global Trade: NAFTA and the Future of Environmental Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, David. 1998a. Maquiladora Workers Elect Their First Independent Union. Z Magazine, January. http://www.zcommunications.org/maquiladora‐workers‐elect‐their‐first‐independent‐union‐by‐david‐bacon (accessed December 15, 2010).Google Scholar
Bacon, David. 1998b. Han Young: Free Trade's Nightmare. San Francisco Bay Guardian, April 1.Google Scholar
Campaign for Labor Rights. 1997a. Alert, November. Washington, DC: Campaign for Labor Rights. In the author's possession.Google Scholar
Campaign for Labor Rights. 1997b. Alert, December 10. Washington, DC: Campaign for Labor Rights. In the author's possession.Google Scholar
Campaign for Labor Rights. 1998. Alert, January 12. Washington, DC: Campaign for Labor Rights. In the author's possession.Google Scholar
Caporaso, Jim, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2009. Polanyi in Brussels: Supranational Institutions and the Transnational Embedding of Markets. International Organization 63 (4): 593–620.Google Scholar
Cohen, Larry, and Early, Steve. 1998. Defending Workers' Rights in the New Global Economy: The CWA Experience. In Which Direction for Organized Labor? Essays on Organizing, Outreach, and Internal Transformations, ed. Nissen, Bruce, 143–66. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Commission for Labor Cooperation. 1997. Review of the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation 1994–1997. http://new.naalc.org/naalc/4year‐review.htm (accessed December 15, 2010).Google Scholar
Compa, Lance. 1999. The North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation and International Labor Solidarity. In Memorias: Encuentro Trinacional de Laboralistas Democráticos, 185–211. México, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Compa, Lance. 2003. Defending Labor Rights in the Americas: National, Regional and Global Approaches. Paper presented at the Meetings of the Latin American Studies Association, in Dallas, Texas. March 27–29.Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena. 1997. Regional Integration and Transnational Politics: Popular Sector Strategies in the NAFTA Era. In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America, ed. Chalmers, Douglas A., Vilas, Carlos M., Hile, Katherine, Martin, Scott B., Piester, Kerianne, and Segarra, Monique, 516–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cusick, John. 1995. Response to NAFTA: U.S. and Mexican Telecom Unions Build North American Labor Solidarity. CWA News, November/December, 10.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella, and Caiani, Manuela. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie‐Laure, and Sahlin‐Andersson, Kerstin. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D⊘lvik, Jon Erik. 1997. Redrawing Boundaries of Solidarity? ETUC, Social Dialogue and the Europeanisation of Trade Unions in the 1990s. Oslo: Arena.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N. 1996. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3): 379–406.Google Scholar
Evans, Rhonda. 2002. The Rise of Ethical Trade Advocacy: NAFTA and the New Politics of Trade. PhD diss., Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Evans, Rhonda, and Kay, Tamara. 2008. How Environmentalists “Greened” Trade Policy: Strategic Action and the Architecture of Field Overlap. American Sociological Review 73 (6): 970–91.Google Scholar
Fleury‐Steiner, Benjamin, and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2006. The New Civil Rights Research: A Constitutive Perspective. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Gajewska, Katarzyna. 2009. Transnational Labour Solidarity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graubart, Jonathan. 2008. Legalizing Transnational Activism: The Struggle to Gain Social Change from NAFTA's Citizen Petitions. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. 1992. A Community of Interests? Making the Most of European Law. Modern Law Review 55 (3): 331–51.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence. 2006. Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the ILO. Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (3): 649–726.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta, and Locher, Birgit, eds. 2009. Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kay, Tamara. 2005. Labor Transnationalism and Global Governance: The Impact of NAFTA on Transnational Labor Relationships in North America. American Journal of Sociology 111:715–56.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 2003. Two Globalizations of Law & Legal Thought: 1850–1968. Suffolk University Law Review 36:631–79.Google Scholar
Kidder, Thalia G. 2002. Networks in Transnational Labor Organizing. In Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, ed. Khagram, Sanjeev, 269–93. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl. 1978. Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness. Minnesota Law Review 62:265–339.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hong. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75:181–207.Google Scholar
Lutz, Ellen, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2001. “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law 2:1–34.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1998. How Does Law Matter for Social Movements? In How Does Law Matter? ed. Garth, Bryant G. and Sarat, Austin, 76–108. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Luis. 1998. A Dissenting Opinion. In Review of the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation 1994–1997, ed. Commission on Labor Cooperation. http://new.naalc.org/naalc/4year‐review.htm (accessed December 15, 2010).Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1988. “Getting Involved: Identity and Mobilization in Social Movements.” In International Social Movement Research: Organizing for Change: Social Movement Organizations in Europe and the United States, vol. 1, ed. Klandermans, Bert, 329–48. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working‐Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation, U.S.—Can.—Mex., Sept. 14, 1993, 32 I.L.M. 1499 (entered into force Jan. 1, 1994).Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J., and Schrank, Andrew. 2008. Toward Managed Flexibility: The Revival of Labour Inspection in the Latin World. International Labour Review 147 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Rogers, Joel. 1990. Divide and Conquer: Further Reflections on the Distinctive Character of American Labor Laws. Wisconsin Law Review 1990:1–147.Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M. 1986. The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women's Movement. New York University Law Review 61:589–652.Google Scholar
Schrank, Andrew, and Murillo, M. Victoria. 2005. With a Little Help from My Friends: Partisan Politics, Transnational Alliances, and Labor Rights in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 38 (8): 971–99.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2005. The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, ed. Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line and Angell, Alan, 263–92. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne‐Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, Hobart. 1992. The Two Latin American Foreign Policies of the U.S. Labor Movement. Science and Society 56 (4): 421–39.Google Scholar
Stone, Katherine Van Wezel. 1981. The Post‐War Paradigm in American Labor Law. Yale Law Journal 90 (7): 1509–80.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. Fishnets, Internets and Catnets: Globalization and Social Movements. Paper presented at the Conference on Structure, Identity and Power: The Past and Future of Collective Action, June, 1995, in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Heather L. 2003. Of Labor Tragedy and Legal Farce: The Han Young Factory Struggle in Tijuana, Mexico. Social Science History 27 (4): 525–50.Google Scholar