Skip to main content Accessibility help

Legal Theory for Legal Empiricists

  • Hanoch Dagan, Roy Kreitner and Tamar Kricheli-Katz


There is a widespread view that one does either theory or empirical work, and that theory and empiricism represent distant concerns, opposing worldviews, and perhaps distinct mentalities or personalities. This prevalent view has deep roots and is also the result of pragmatic and understandable tendencies toward division of intellectual labor. Against this view, this essay suggests that the relations between theory and empirical study ought to be understood as more intimate and that making legal theory an explicit focus can improve empirical scholarship. We pursue this claim by articulating a basis for legal theory and by showing how that basis illuminates both the application and design of empirical research on law. Legal theory, we argue, follows jurisprudence in interrogating the law as a set of coercive normative institutions. The upshot of this approach is a recognition that an interdisciplinary analysis of law must rely on both a theory (explicit or implicit) of the way law's power and its normativity align and an account of the way in which this discursive cohabitation manifests itself institutionally. We thus argue that legal theory is necessary in order to draw fruitfully on empirical research and further claim that legal theory provides guidance both for setting up an empirical research agenda on law and for designing research into specific topics.



Hide All
Aigner, Dennis J., and Cain, Glen G.Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 30 (1977): 175–87.
Albiston, Catherine. Institutional Inequality and the Mobilization of the Family and Medical Leave Act: Rights On Leave. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Albiston, Catherine, Correll, Shelley, Tucker, Traci, and Stevens, Christina. “Laws, Norms and the Caretaker Penalty.” Manuscript in progress.
Austin, John. 1832. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Edited by Hart, H. L. A. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, [1832] 1954.
Ayres, Ian, and Siegelman, Peter. “Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car.” American Economic Review 85 (1995): 304–21.
Baker, Tom, and Griffith, Sean J. Ensuring Corporate Misconduct: How Liability Insurers Undermines Shareholder Litigation. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2010.
Bertrand, Marianne. “New Perspectives on Gender.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, edited by Card, D. and Ashenfelter, O., 1543–90. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011.
Blau, Francine D., and Kahn, Lawrence M.Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (2000): 7599.
Cohen, Felix S.Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach.” Columbia Law Review 35 (1935): 809–49.
Constable, Marianne. Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Correll, Shelley J., and Benard, Stephen. “Biased Estimators? Comparing Status and Statistical Theories of Gender Discrimination.” Advances in Group Processes 23 (2006): 89116.
Dagan, Hanoch. Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Dagan, Hanoch.Doctrinal Categories, Legal Realism, and The Rule of Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163 (2015): 1889–917.
Dagan, Hanoch, and Kreitner, Roy. “The Character of Legal Theory.” Cornell Law Review 96 (2011): 671–92.
Dagan, Hanoch. “The Interdisciplinary Party.” Critical Analysis of Law 1, no. 1 (2014): 2331.
Dickson, Julie. “Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law?” In Law as Institutional Normative Order, edited by Del Mar, M. and Bankowski, Z., 161–83. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.
Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., and Lande, John. “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace.” Law and Society Review 27, no. 3 (1993): 497534.
Edelman, Lauren B., Krieger, Linda H., Eliason, Scott R., Albiston, Catherine R., and Mellema, Virginia. “When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures. American Journal of Sociology 117 (2011): 888954.
Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S.The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (1999): 406–54.
England, Paula. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1992.
Erlanger, Howard, Grant, Bryant, Larson, Jane, Mertz, Elizabeth, Nourse, Victoria, and Wilkins, David. “Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?Wisconsin Law Review 2005 (2005): 335–64.
Fischman, Joshua B.Reuniting ‘Is' and ‘Ought’ in Empirical Legal Scholarship.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 162 (2013): 117–68.
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., and Glick, Peter. “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, no. 2 (2007): 7783.
Galster, George, and Constantine, Peter. “Discrimination Against Female‐Headed Households in Rental Housing.” Review of Social Economy 49, no. 1 (1991): 76100.
Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo. “A Fine Is a Price.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 1, 59, 15.
Goldin, Claudia. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Gulati, Mitu, and Nielsen, Laura Beth. “Introduction: A New Legal Realist Perspective on Employment Discrimination.” Law and Social Inquiry 31 (2006): 797800.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.
Huq, Aziz Z., Tyler, Tom R, and Schulhofer, Stephen J.Why Does the Public Cooperate with Law Enforcement? The Influence of the Purposes and Targets of Policing.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 17 (2011): 419–50.
Kalev, Alexandra, Dobbin, Frank, and Kelly, Erin L.Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review 71 (2006): 589617.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.
Kennedy, Duncan.The Hermeneutic of Suspicion in Contemporary American Legal Thought.” Law Critique 25 (2014): 91139.
Kreitner, Roy.Biographing Legal Realism.” Law and Social Inquiry 35 (2010): 765–91.
Krieger, Linda H.The Content of Our Categories: A Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity.” Stanford Law Review 47 (1995): 1181–85.
Krieger, Linda H., and Fiske, Susan T.Behavioral Realism in Employment Discrimination Law: Implicit Bias and Disparate Treatment.” California Law Review 94 (2006): 9971026.
Leiter, Brian.Legal Realisms, Old and New.” University of Valparaiso Law Review 47 (2013): 949–64.
Macaulay, Stewart.The New versus the Old Legal Realism: ‘Things Ain't What They Used to Be.’” Wisconsin Law Review 2005 (2005): 365404.
Mertz, Elizabeth. The Language of the Law: Learning to Think Like a Lawyer. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Moore, Sally. Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Nelson, Robert L., and Bridges, William P. Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets and Unequal Pay for Women. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
New Legal Realism Project, The. “About the New Legal Realism Project.” 2011., 2011.
Nourse, Victoria, and Shaffer, Gregory. “Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?Cornell Law Review 95 (2009): 61138.
O'Neill, June, and Polachek, Solomon. “Why the Gender Gap in Wages Narrowed in the 1980s.” Journal of Labor Economics 11 (1993): 205–28.
Pager, Devah. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
Pashukanis, Evgeny B. The General Theory of Law & Marxism. Translated by Barbara Einhorn. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, [1924] 2002.
Penner, J. E.Decent Burial for Dead Concepts.” Current Legal Problems 58 (2010): 313–42.
Pildes, Richard H.Institutional Formalism and Realism in Constitutional and Public Law.” Supreme Court Review (2013): 154.
Pinkston, J. C.A Test of Screening Discrimination with Employer Learning.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 59 (2006): 26284.
Posner, Richard A. Frontiers of Legal Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Pound, Roscoe.The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence.” Green Bag 19 (1908): 607–15.
Pound, Roscoe.Mechanical Jurisprudence.” Columbia Law Review 8 (1908): 605.
Priest, George L. 1983. “Social Science Theory and Legal Education: The Law School as University.” Journal of Legal Education 33 (1983): 437–41.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L.Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review 70 (2014): 116.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Correll, Shelley J.Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Cultural Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender and Society 18 (2004): 510–31.
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
Schlegel, John Henry. American Legal Realism and Empirical Legal Science Durham, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
Solan, Lawrence M., and Darley, John M.Causation, Contribution, and Legal Liability: An Empirical Study.” Law and Contemporary Problems 64, no. 4 (2001): 265–98.
Stern, Stephanie M.Outpsyched: The Battle of Expertise in Psychology‐Informed Law.” Jurimetrics 57 (2016): 4580.
Twining, William. “Legal R/realism and Jurisprudence: Ten Theses.” In The New Regal Realism: Translating Law‐and‐Society for Today's Legal Practice, edited by Macauley, Stewart, Mertz, Elizabeth, and Mitchell, Thomas W. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Tyler, Tom R., and Schulhofer, Stephen J.Mechanisms for Eliciting Cooperation in Counterterrorism Policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (2011): 728–61.
Tyler, Tom R., Schulhofer, Stephen J., and Huq, Aziz Z. 2010. “Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counter‐Terrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans.” Law and Society Review 44 (2010): 365401.
Ulen, Thomas S.A Nobel Prize in Legal Science: Theory, Empirical Work, and the Scientific Method in the Study of Law.” University of Illinois Law Review 2002 (2002): 875920.
Van Zandt, David E.Discipline‐Based Faculty.” Journal of Legal Education 53 (2003): 332–39.
Weinrib, Ernest J. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Legal Theory for Legal Empiricists

  • Hanoch Dagan, Roy Kreitner and Tamar Kricheli-Katz


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.