Skip to main content Accessibility help

International Arbitration and Judicial Politics in Authoritarian States

  • Mark Fathi Massoud


This article uses the case of Sudan to show how authoritarian regimes benefit from embracing international arbitration, allowing them to maintain domestic control and attract foreign investment. International arbitration ensures that foreign‐investment disputes are resolved outside of domestic purview, obviating the need for nondemocratic states to create independent courts. Research on judicial politics in authoritarian regimes has largely overlooked those private and extra‐judicial pathways—international arbitration tribunals—that illiberal regimes have been taking. Similarly, research in international commercial law has neglected domestic politics, overlooking arbitration's consequences for domestic stakeholders. Promoting international arbitration without paying heed to its side effects can unwittingly help illiberal regimes, particularly in weak states, to continue to repress their judiciaries and curtail the development of domestic legal institutions and the rule of law.



Hide All
Abouda, Alkoni Ali. 2010. The New Libyan Draft Law on Arbitration. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 2:3143.
Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Republic of Sudan Concerning the Promotion and Protection of Investments. 1998. (accessed June 15, 2013).
Aguirre, Daniel. 2008. The Human Right to Development in a Globalized World. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Aljazy, Omar. 2008. Arbitration in Jordan: From Old to New. Journal of International Arbitration 25:219229.
Al Kalyoubi, Samiha. 2010. The Role of the Egyptian Judiciary in Securing the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 2:1729.
Aoun, Rita Bou. 2010. A New Draft Arbitration Law in the Republic of Yemen. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 2:7396.
Asouzu, Amazu A. 2001. International Commercial Arbitration and African States: Practice, Participation, and Institutional Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Binham, Caroline, and Warrell, Hellen 2012. Saudis Seek Private Court in London. Financial Times, October 30.‐1f93‐11e2‐b273‐00144feabdc0.html#axzz2C4mDUljQ (accessed June 15, 2013).
Bishop, R. Doak. 2009. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Sovereigns. Huntington, NY: JurisNet.
Born, Gary. 2001. International Commercial Arbitration: Commentary and Materials. The Hague, Netherlands: Transnational Publishers/Kluwer Law International.
Bowen, Rachel. 2010. International Imposition and Transmission of Democracy and the Rule of Law: Lessons from Central America. In Globalizing Justice: Critical Perspectives on Transnational Norms and Cross‐Border Migration of Legal Norms, ed. Jackson, Donald, Tolley, Michael, and Volcansek, Mary, 161178. Albany: SUNY University Press.
Brower, Charles N., and Sharpe, Jeremy K. 2003. International Arbitration and the Islamic World: The Third Phase. American Journal of International Law 97:643656.
Burr, J. Millard, and Collins, Robert O. 2003. Revolutionary Sudan: Hasan Al‐Turabi and the Islamist State, 1989–2000. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
Cashisho, Louis. 2009. Commentary on the New Commercial Arbitration Rules in Syria. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 1:2730.
Collins, Robert O. 2008. A History of Modern Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwazeh, N., and El‐Kosheri, A. S. 2008. Arbitration in the Arab World: An Interview with Professor Ahmed Sadek El‐Kosheri. Journal of International Arbitration 25:203210.
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 2011. Introduction: Lawyers, Law, and Society. In Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. New York: Routledge.
Dickerson, Claire Moore. 2009. Unified Business Laws for Africa: Common Law Perspectives on Ohada. London: GMB.
Dubai International Arbitration Centre. 2007. Symposium of Sudanese Bar Association: Seminar on Commercial Arbitration. Dubai International Arbitration Centre Journal 2:89.
Eaton, Kent. 2010. Subnational Economic Nationalism? The Contradictory Effects of Decentralization in Peru. Third World Quarterly 31:12051222.
El Ahdab, Jalal. 2009. Editor's Preliminary Note. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 1:78.
Foreign Investment Advisory Service. 2006. Sudan: Review of Administrative Barriers to Investment. Washington, DC: World Bank/International Finance Corporation.
Franck, Susan D. 2005. The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions. Fordham Law Review 73:15211626.
Franck, Susan D. 2009. Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration. Harvard International Law Journal 50:435489.
Frye, Timothy. 2004. Credible Commitments and Property Rights: Evidence from Russia. American Political Science Review 98:453466.
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9:95160.
Gehlbach, Scott, and Keefer, Philip 2011. Investment Without Democracy: Ruling‐Party Institutionalization and Credible Commitment in Autocracies. Journal of Comparative Economics 39:123139.
Gélinas, Fabien. 2000. Arbitration and the Challenge of Globalization. Journal of International Arbitration 17:117122.
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ghias, Shoaib A. 2010. Miscarriage of Chief Justice: Judicial Power and the Legal Complex in Pakistan Under Musharraf. Law & Social Inquiry 35:9851022.
Ginsburg, Tom. 2005. International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance. International Review of Law and Economics 25:107123.
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greig, R., Annacker, C., and Ziade, R. 2008. How Bilateral Investment Treaties Can Protect Foreign Investors in the Arab World or Arab Investors Abroad. Journal of International Arbitration 25:257273.
Griffiths, Frances. 1996. Qualitative Research: The Research Questions It Can Help Answer, the Methods It Uses, the Assumptions Behind the Research Questions and What Influences the Direction of Research. A Summary of the Panel Discussion at the Conference “Exploring Qualitative Research in General Practice.” Family Practice 13:S27S30.
Haddad, Ahmed. 2009. The New Syrian Arbitration Act. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 1:1525.
Helmke, G., and Rosenbluth, F. 2009. Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science 12:345366.
Hendley, Kathryn. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter: Legal Reform and Labor Law in the Soviet Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hirschl, Ran. 2008. The Judicialization of Mega‐Politics and the Rise of Political Courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11:93118.
Holt, P. M., and Daly, M. W. 2000. A History of the Sudan: From the Coming of Islam to the Present Day, 5th ed. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2010. Judging from a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary's Human Rights Turn. Law & Social Inquiry 35:99135.
Johnson, A. R. 2010. Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Emory Law Journal 59:919968.
Jones Day. 2004. Arbitration in China. New York: Jones Day.
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2011. Power Broker, Policy Maker, or Rights Protector? The Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal in Transition. In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Rios‐Figueroa, Julio, 154186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kritzer, Herbert M., and Silbey, Susan S. 2003. In Litigation: Do the Haves Still Come Out Ahead? Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics.
Kutty, Faisal. 2006. The Shari'a Factor in International Commercial Arbitration. Loyola L.A. International & Comparative Law Review 28:565624.
Large, Daniel 2009. China's Sudan Engagement: Changing Northern and Southern Political Trajectories in Peace and War. China Quarterly 199:610626.
Lynch, Katherine. 2003. The Forces of Economic Globalization: Challenges to the Regime of International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Mansour, Mouhamed Walid. 2010. The New Laws on Investment, Commerce, Corporations and Arbitration and Their Positive Effect on Investments in Syria. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 2:3141.
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2012. Lawyers and the Disintegration of the Legal Complex in Sudan. In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., 193218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2013. Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McConnaughay, Philip J., and Ginsburg, Thomas B. 2006. International Commercial Arbitration in Asia. Huntington, NY: JurisNet.
Moustafa, Tamir. 2003. Law Versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt. Law & Social Inquiry 28:883930.
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moustafa, Tamir. 2008. Law and Resistance in Authoritarian States: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Moustafa, Tom Ginsburg and Tamir, 132155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neumayer, Eric, and Spess, Laura 2005. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries? World Development 33:15671585.
Nolan‐Haley, Jacqueline, Abramson, Harold, and Chew, Pat K. 2005. International Conflict Resolution: Consensual ADR Processes. New York: Thomson‐West.
Nzelibe, J. 1996. When the Multinational Meets the Patrimonial State: Prospects for Improving Transnational Liability. Journal of International Law and Practice 5:417462.
OHADA. 2011. Ohada: L'harmonisation Du Droit Des Affaires En Afrique. Yaoundé, Cameroun: l'Organisation pour l'Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires.
Peerenboom, Randall. 2009. Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Popova, Maria. 2006. Watchdogs or Attack Dogs? The Role of the Russian Courts and the Central Election Commission in the Resolution of Electoral Disputes. Europe‐Asia Studies 58:391414.
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Rickard, Stephanie J. 2010. International Trade and Domestic Legal Systems: Examining the Impact of Islamic Law. International Interactions 36:335362.
Rone, Jemera. 1996. Behind the Red Line: Political Repression in Sudan. New York: Human Rights Watch.
Sanchez Urribarri, Raul A. 2011. Courts Between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court. Law & Social Inquiry 36:854884.
Schedler, Andreas. 2010. Authoritarianism's Last Line of Defense. Journal of Democracy 21:6980.
Schor, Miguel. 2009. An Essay on the Emergence of Constitutional Courts: The Cases of Mexico and Colombia. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16:173194.
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research. Political Research Quarterly 61:294308.
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro, Martin. 2008. Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 326336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silverstein, Gordon. 2008. Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 73101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sornarajah, M. 1989. The Uncitral Model Law: A Third World Viewpoint. Journal of International Arbitration 64:720.
Staats, Joseph L., and Biglaiser, Glen 2012. Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: The Importance of Judicial Strength and the Rule of Law. International Studies Quarterly 56:193202.
Stern, Rachel E. 2010. On the Frontlines: Making Decisions in Chinese Civil Environmental Lawsuits. Law & Policy 32:79103.
Stern, Rachel E. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sykes, Alan O. 2005. Public Versus Private Enforcement of International Economic Law: Standing and Remedy. Journal of Legal Studies 34:631666.
Tani, Mustapha Trari. 2009. Arbitration in All Related Disputes to Oil, According to the New Algerian Hydrocarbons Law. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 1:8188.
Tezcür, Güneş Murat. 2009. Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case. Law & Society Review 43:305336.
Trochev, Alexei. 2004. Less Democracy, More Courts: A Puzzle of Judicial Review in Russia. Law & Society Review 38:513548.
UNESCO. 1999. Report of the Sub‐Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. E/CN.4/2000/88. (accessed June 15, 2013).
Victor, David G., Hults, David R., and Thurber, Mark C. 2012. Oil and Governance: State‐Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Yuhua. 2010. When Do Autocrats Build Clean Courts? Sub‐National Evidence from China. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. (accessed June 15, 2013).
Werfalli, Mohamed I. 2009. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Libya in a Nutshell. International Journal of Arab Arbitration 1:3739.
World Bank. 2011. World Development Report 2011. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. n.d. World Development Indicators. (accessed June 15, 2013).
Sudan Arbitration Act, 2005.
Sudan Investment Encouragement Act, 1999.

International Arbitration and Judicial Politics in Authoritarian States

  • Mark Fathi Massoud


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed