Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship

  • Mark A. Graber
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

References

Hide All
Amsterdam, Anthony G. 1974. Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Law Review 58: 349477.
Balkin, J. M., and Levinson, Sanford. 1999. Interpreting Law and Music: Performance Notes on “The Banjo Serenader” and “The Lying Crowd of Jews. Cardozo Law Review 20: 1513–72.
Battle for the Bench. 2000. Economist, 7 June.
Beck, Paul Allen. 1976. Critical Elections and the Supreme Court: Putting the Cart after the Horse. American Political Science Review 70: 930–32.
Bickel, Alexander M. 1955. The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision. Harvard Law Review 69: 165.
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Black, Charles L. Jr. 1967. Foreword: “State Action,” Equal Protection, and California's Proposition 14. Harvard Law Review 81: 69109.
Bork, Robert H. 1971. Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems. Indiana Law Journal 47: 135.
Bork, Robert H. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Bork, Robert H. 1996. Slouching towards Gomorrah: Modem Liberalism and American Decline. New York: HarperCollins.
Brandon, Mark E. 1998. Free in the World: American Slavery and Constitutional Failure. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Canon, Bradley C., and Sidney Ulmer, S. 1976. The Supreme Court and Critical Elections: A Dissent. American Political Science Review 70: 1215–18.
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. The Supreme Court and National Policy Making. American Political Science Review 70: 5063.
Congressional Globe. 1865. 38th Cong. 2nd sess.
Cox, Archibald. 1966. Foreword: Constitutional Adjudication and the Promotion of Human Rights. Harvard Law Review 80: 91122.
Cross, Frank B. 1997. Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance. Northwestern University Law Review 92: 251326.
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95.
Danelski, David J. 1964. A Supreme Court Justice Is Appointed. New York: Random House.
Devins, Neal. 1996. Shaping Constitutional Values: Elected Government, the Supreme Court, and the Abortion Debate. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Duxbury, Neil. 1993. Faith in Reason: The Process Tradition in American Jurisprudence. Cardozo Law Review 15: 601705.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Elkin, Stephen L. 2001. The Constitutional Theory of the Commercial Republic. Fordham Law Review 69: 1933–68.
Ely, John Hart. 1970. Legislative and Administrative Motivation in Constitutional Law. Yak Law Journal 79: 12051341.
Ely, John Hart. 1973. The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade. Yale Law Journal 82: 920–49.
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Emerson, Thomas I. 1963. Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment. Yale Law Journal 72: 877956.
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991. Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game. California Law Review 79: 613–84.
Fallen, Richard H. Jr. 2001. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: fnterpretation as Political Process. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Franklin, Charles, and Kosaki, Liane C. 1989. Republican Schoolmaster: The U. S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion. American Political Science Review 83: 751–71.
Friedman, Barry. 1993. Dialogue and Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review 91: 577682.
Friedman, Barry. 1998. The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy. New York University Law Review 73: 333433.
Funston, Richard. 1975. The Supreme Court and Critical Elections. American Political Science Review 69: 795811.
Funston, Richard. 1976a. To the Editor. American Political Science Review 70: 932.
Funston, Richard. 1976b. Funston Reply to Canon and Ulmer. American Political Science Review 70: 1218–21.
Funston, Richard. 1977. Constitutional Counterrevolution.7 The Warren Court and the Burger Court: Judicial Policy making in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.
Funston, Richard. 1978. A Vital National Seminar: The Supreme Court in American Political Life. Palo Alto, Calif.: Mayfield.
Garrow, David J. 1994. Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade. New York: Macmillan.
Gillman, Howard. 2001. What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making. Law and Social Inquiry 26: 465–98.
Graber, Mark A. 1991. Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Graber, Mark. 1993. The Non-Majoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7: 3573.
Graber, Mark. 1995. The Passive-Aggressive Virtues: Cohens v. Virginia and the Problematic Establishment of Judicial Power. Constitutional Commentary 12: 6792.
Graber, Mark. 1996. Rethinking Abortion: Equal Choke, the Constitution, and Reproductive Politics. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Graber, Mark. 2000. The Law Professor as Populist. University of Richmond Law Review 34: 373413.
Greenawalt, Kent. 1978. The Enduring Significance of Neutral Principles. Columbia Law Review 78: 9821021.
Grey, Thomas C. 1975. Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution Stanford Law Review 27: 703–18.
Griffin, Stephen M. 1996. American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Gunther, Gerald. 1972. Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection. Harvard Law Review 86: 1.
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library.
Hart, Henry M. Jr. 1959. Foreword: The Time Chart of the Justices. Harvard Law Review 73: 84125.
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion. American Political Science Review 94: 89100.
Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
Howard, A. E. Dick. 2000. The Activists on the Bench. Washington Post, Book World, 6 November.
Howard, Woodford J. 1968. On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice. American Political Science Review 62: 4356.
Kalman, Laura. 1986. Legal Realism at Yale, 1927-1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Louis White Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational.
Karst, Kenneth L. 2001. Book Review. American Historical Review 106: 1021.
Keck, Thomas. Forthcoming. The Supreme Court and Modern Constitutional Conservatism, 1937-2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89: 16851778.
Klarman, Michael J. 1996. Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions. Virginia Law Review 82: 167.
Koppelman, Andrew. 1996. Antidiscrimination Law and Social Equality. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Krislov, Samuel. 1965. The Supreme Court in the Political Process. New York: Macmillan.
Lawrence, Susan E. 1990. The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme Court Decision Making. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Lazarus, Edward. 2000. What Warren Wrought. Los Angeles Times Book Review, 11 June.
Leff, Mark H. 1995. Revisioning U. S. Political History. American Historical Review 100: 829–53.
Lefkowitz, Jay P. 2000. If the Legislature Won't Do It, We Will. Wall Street Journal, 20 March, 30.
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Constitutional Faith. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Levinson, Sanford, and Balkin, J. M. 1991. Law, Music, and Other Performing Arts. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139: 15971658.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The Erambk Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. New York: Oceana Publications.
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Marshall, Thomas. 1987. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. New York: Longman.
Mendelson, Wallace. 1985. Supreme Court Statecraft: The Rule of Law and Men. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Michelman, Frank I. 1967. Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of Just Compensation Law. Harvard Law Review 80: 1665.
Michelman, Frank I. 1969. Foreword: On Protecting the Poor through the Fourteenth Amendment. Harvard Law Review 83: 759.
Michelman, Frank. 1973. In Pursuit of Constitutional Welfare Rights: One View of Rawls's Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121: 9621019.
Michelman, Frank I. 1999. Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S. 1993. The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions. American Political Science Review 87: 87101.
Murphy, Walter F. 1961. In His Own Image: Mr. Chief Justice Taft and Supreme Court Appointments. In 1961: The Supreme Court Review, ed. Kurland, Philip B. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, Walter F. 1962. Congress and the Court: A Case Study in American Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O'Brien, David M. 1986. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
Overby, L. Marvin, Henschen, Beth M., Walsh, Michael H., and Strauss, Julie. 1992. Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas. American Political Science Review 86: 9971003.
Peretti, Terri Jennings. 1999. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Perry, H. W. Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Perry, Michael J. 1982. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Perry, Michael J. 1988. Morality, Politics, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perry, Michael J. 1991. Love and Power: The Role of Religion and Morality in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perry, Michael J. 1994- The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? New York: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Richard A. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Posner, Richard A. 1999. Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Posner, Richard A. 2001. Frontiers of Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Pound, Roscoe. 1954. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Rae, Nicol C. 1989. The Decline and Fall of the Liberal Republicans: From 1952 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2000. The End of Deference. New Republic, 6 November, 3945.
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2000. Bringing Politics Back in. Northwestern University Law Review 95: 309–26.
Rubenfeld, Jed. 2001. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self Government. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Scheiber, Harry N. 1981. American Constitutional History and the New Legal History: Complementary Themes in Two Modes. Journal of American History 68: 337–50.
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1988. Legal Secrets: Equality and Efficiency in the Common Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999. Supreme Court Deference to Congress: An Examination of the Marksist Model. In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Seidman, Louis Michael. 1992. Brown and Miranda. California Law Review 80: 673753.
Sen, Amartya. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, Fred R. 1985. The Most-Cited Law Review Articles. California Law Review 73: 1540–54.
Shapiro, Martin. 1983. Fathers and Sons: The Court, The Commentators, and the Search for Values. In The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution That Wasn't, ed. Blasi, Vincent. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Shapiro, Fred R. 1991. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Silver, Daniel J. 2000. Our Robed Masters: It All Began with the Warren Court. Weekly Standard, 31 July 31, 36.
Spaeth, Harold J., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999. Majority Rule or Minority Witt: Adherence to Precedent on the U. S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stearns, Maxwell L. 2000. Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Stewart, Richard B. 1975. The Reformation of American Administrative Law. Harvard Law Review 88: 16671813.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. After the Rights Revolution: Recanceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1997. Free Markets and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2001. Republic. com. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Tate, C, Neal, . 1995. Why the Expansion of Judicial Power? In The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, ed. Neal Tate, C. and Vallinder, Torbjorn. New York: New York University Press.
Tribe, Laurence H. 1977. Unraveling National League of Cities: The New Federalism and Affirmative Rights to Essential Government Services. Harvard Law Review 90: 10651104.
Tribe, Laurence H. 1985. Constitutional Choices. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Tribe, Laurence H., and Dorf, Michael C. 1991. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Tushnet, Mark. 1988. Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Tushnet, Mark. 2000. The Politics of Constitutional Law. Texas Law Review 79: 163–87.
Urofsky, Mel. 2001. Revivifying Political Science: Lucas A. Powe, Jr., on the Warren Court. Journal of Supreme Court History 26: 8994.
Vose, Clement E. 1972. Constitutional Change: Amendment Politics and Supreme Court Litigation Since 1970. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review 73: 135.
Wechsler, Herbert. 1965. The Courts and the Constitution. Columbia Law Review 65: 1001–14.
Wellington, Harry H. 1973. Common Law Rules and Constitutional Double Standards: Some Notes on Adjudication. Yale Law Journal 83: 221311.
West, Robin. 1994. Progressive Constitutionalism; Reconstructing the Fourteenth Amendment. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press.
Whittington, Keith. 2000. The Politics of the Supreme Court. Policy Review 102 (Aug./Sept.): 6370.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed