Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Clearing the Underbrush for Real-Life Contracting

  • William J. Woodward

Copyright

References

Hide All
Braucher, Jean. 1990. Contract Versus Contractarianism: The Regulatory Role of Contract Law. Washington and Lee Law Review 47:697739.
Braucher, Jean. 1995. The Afterlife of Contract. Northwestern Law Review 90:4988.
Budnitz, Mark E. 1992. The Revision of U.C.C. Articles Three and Four: A Process Which Excluded Consumer Protection Requires Federal Action. Mercer Law Review 43:827–51.
Calamari, John D., and Perillo, Joseph M. 1967. A Plea for a Uniform Parol Evidence Rule and Principles of Contract Interpretation. Indiana Law Journal 42:333–54.
Casner, James A., ed. 1952. American Law of Property. Vol. 1. Boston: Little, Brown.
Chafee, Zechariah. 1930. The Internal Affairs of Associations Not for Profit. 43 Harvard Law Review 43:9931029.
Cooper, Corinne. 1993. The Madonnas Play Tug of War with the Whores or Who Is Saving the UCC Loyola. of Los Angeles Law Review 26:563–77.
Corbin, Arthur L. 1944. The Parol Evidence Rule. Yale Law Journal 53:603–63.
Danzig, Richard. 1974. The Capability Problem in Contract Law. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press.
Edwards, Harry T. 1992. The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession Michigan Law Review 91:3440.
Feinman, Jay. Promissory Estoppel and Judicial Method. Harvard Law Review 97:678700.
Fineman, Martha. 1988. Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decision Making. Harvard Law Review 101:727–74.
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95160.
Galanter, Marc, and Cahill, Mia. 1994. “Most Cases Settle”: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements. Stanford Law Review 46:1339–91.
Gilmore, . 1974. The Death of Contract. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Goetz, Charles, and Scott, Robert. 1977. Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach. Columbia Law Review 77:554–94.
Goetz, Charles, and Scott, Robert. 1979. Measuring Sellers' Damages: The Lost-Profits Puzzle. Stanford Law Review 31:323–73.
Gordon, Robert W. 1985. Macaulay, Macneil, and the Discovery of Solidarity and Power in Contract Law. Wisconsin Law Review 1985:565–79.
Grillo, Trina. 1991. The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women. 100 Yale Law Journal 100:15451610.
Hillebrand, Gail. Symposium, The Redrafting of UCC Articles 2 and 9: Model Codes or Model Dinosaurs Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 28:191217.
Holden, Mary Wisniewski. 1997. As Courts Overflow, Mediation Flourishes. Chicago Lawyer, March.
Janger, Edward J. 1997. Predicting When the Uniform Law Process Will Fail: Article 9, Capture, and the Race to the Bottom. Iowa Law Review 83:569632.
Janoff, Sandra. 1991. The Influence of Legal Education on Moral Reasoning. Minnesota Law Review 76:193236.
Keeton, Robert E. 1971. Insurance Law: Basic Text. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
Keeton, Page W., Dan Dobbs, B., Keeton, Robert E., Owen, David G. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on Torts. 5th ed. St. Paul, Minn:West.
Kessler, Frederich. 1943. Contracts of Adhesion-Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract. Columbia Law Review 43:629–42.
King, Donald B. 1992. Major Problems With Article 2A: Unfairness, “Cutting Off” Consumer Defenses, Unfiled Interests, and Uneven Adoption. Mercer Law Review 43:869–85.
Kuzuhara, Kizuki. 1996. Contracting Between a Japanese Enterprise and an American Enterprise: The Differences in the Importance of Written Documents as the Final Agreement in the United States and Japan. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 3:5791.
Leff, Arthur. 1969. Unconscionability and the Crowd-Consumers and the Common Law Tradition. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 31:349–58.
Leff, Arthur. 1979. Thomist Unconscionability. Canadin Business Law Journal 4:424–28.
Linzer, Peter. 1981. On the Amorality of Contract Remedies-Efficiency, Equity, and the Second Restatement. Columbia Law Review 81:111–39.
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1939a. Across Sales on Horseback. Harvard Law Review 52:725–46.
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1939b. Book Review of O. Prausnitz, The Standardization of Commercial Contracts in English and Continental Law . Harvard Law Review 52:700705.
Macneil, Ian. 1974. The Many Futures of Contracts. Southern California Law Review 47:691–98.
Macneil, Ian. 1977. Contracts: Exchange Transactions and Relations. 2d ed. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press.
Macneil, Ian. 1984. Bureaucracy and Contracts of Adhesion. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22:528.
Mann, Ronald. 1996. Explaining the Pattern of Secured Credit. Harvard Law Review 110:625–83.
Mansfield, Edwin, and Behraveth, Nariman. 1986. Economics USA, 3145. New York: Norton.
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1991. Symposium: Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or “The Law of ADR. Florida State University Law Review 19:146.
Meyerson, M. 1993. The Reunification of Contract Law: The Objective Theory of Consumer Form Contracts. University of Miami Law Review 47:1263–333.
Miller, Fred H. 1994. Symposium: The Revision of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Consumer Issues and the Revision of U.CC. Article 2. William and Mary Law Review 35:1565–91.
Mooney, Ralph James. 1995. The New Conceptualism in Contract Law. Oregon Law Review 74:11311207.
Patterson, Edwin W. 1919. The Delivery of a Life-Insurance Policy. Harvard Law Review 33:198222.
Palay, Thomas. 1986. Relational Contracting, Transaction Cost Economics and the Governance of HMOs. Temple Law Quarterly 59:927950.
Perlman, Harvey S. 1982. Interference with Contract and Other Economic Expectancies: A Clash of Tort and Contract Doctrine. University of Chicago Law Review 49:61129.
Posner, Richard. 1992. Economic Analysis of the Law. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
Ribstein, Larry E. 1993. Choosing Law by Contract. Journal of Corporate Law 18:245300.
Rosmarin, Yvonne W. 1994. Symposium: The Revision of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, Consumers-R-Us: A Reality in the U.C.C. Article 2 Revision Process. William and Mary Law Review 35:15931633.
Schwartz, Alan. 1990. The Myth that Promisees Prefer Supracompensatory Remedies: An Analysis. Yale Law Journal 100:369407.
Schwartz, Alan, and Scott, Robert. 1995. The Political Economy of Private Legislatures. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143:595654.
Schwartz, Alan, and Wilde, Louis L. 1979. Intervening in Markets on the Basis of Imperfect Information: A Legal and Economic Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127:630–82.
Schwartz, David S. 1997. Enforcing Small Print to Protect Big Business: Employee and Consumer Rights Claims in an Age of Compelled Arbitration. Wisconsin Law Review 1997:33132.
Scott, Robert E. 1994. The Politics of Article 9. Virginia Law Review 80:17831851.
Speidel, Richard. 1996. Securities Arbitration: a Decade After Mcmahon: Contract Theory And Securities Arbitration: Whither Consent Brooklyn Law Review 62:1335–80.
Twain, Mark. [1884]1981. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Reprint. New York: Bantam.
U.S. Law Week. 1997. Elimination of Mandatory Arbitration Claims Proposed by NASD. 66 (19 August): 2105–6.
Von Mehren, Arthur Taylor, and Russell Gordley, James. 1977. The civil Law System. An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
Warren, Elizabeth. 1987. Bankruptcy Policy. University of Chicago Law Review 54:775814.
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1996. Contractarians, Community, and the Tort of Interference with Contract. Minnesota Law Review 80:1103–82.
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1997a. Contracts for Grown-ups. Journal of Legal Education 47:139–48.
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1997b. The Realist and Secured Credit: Grant Gilmore, Common Law Courts, and the Article 9 Reform Process. Cornell Law Review 82:1511–31.
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1997c. “Sale” of Law and Forum and the Widening Gulf Between “Consumer” and “Nonconsumer” Contracts in the UCC. Washington University Law Quarterly 75:243–87.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed